Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0464
Original file (FD2001-0464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

“

 

 

 

 

 

 

ay
. iNAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
AMN
TYPE
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

MEMBERS SITTING : Ton GEN OTHE OTnte DENY

i_
as

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER suka ci nneage

A92.21/22, A94.53/54 A66.00, A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOAR
2, | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

Lo

3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

19 NOV 02 FD2001-0464 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
oe UT RATONALE: Ee

ee
oe

    
      

 

REMARKS

The applicant was scheduled for a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board at Dobbins ARB, GA on
November 19, 2002, but after acknowledging intent to appear, failed to do so without requesting a postponement. The case
was considered via records review.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF REGO DER ATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

 

 

SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°? FLOOR

 

 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2001-0464

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was scheduled for a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) at
Dobbins ARB, GA on November 19, 2002, but after acknowledging intent to appear, failed to do so
without requesting a postponement.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUES: The applicant’s issues are listed in the attached brief.

The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge in order to reenter the Armed Services for his own personal
pride and contends that he has the potential to become a physician/officer. The applicant was discharged
with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for drug abuse and minor disciplinary infractions
after 2 years, 1 month and 4 days of service. The member received an Article 15 for wrongful use of
marijuana and wrongfully and falsely altering his birth date on his military identification card. The
applicant’s excellent record of duty performance as reflected in performance reports was noted by the DRB
however the seriousness of the willful misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all
military members.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of
the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable

basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment
Examiner's Brief
FD2001-0464
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 97/12/24 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.54 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable Disch. “—

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 77/01/25. Enlmt Age: 18 9/13. Disch Age: 20 10/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFOQT: N/A. A-79, E-84, G-86, M-72. PAFSC: 4M031 -~ Aerospace Physiology
Apprentice. DAS: 96/04/06.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 95/11/08 - 95/11/20 (13 days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enld as Amn 95/11/21 for 4 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 01 Mo 04 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AMN - 97/12/04 (Article 15, 97/12/04)
AlC - 97/03/21
AMN - 96/05/21

ec. Time Lost: none.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 97/12/04, Shaw AFB, SC - Article 112a. You did, on
divers occasions between on or about 6 Apr 96 and on or
about 30 Sep 97, wrongfully use marijuana. Article 134.
You did, between on or about 6 Apr 96 and on or about 30
Sep 97, wrongfully and falsely alter by changing the
reverse side, a military identification card in words and
figures as follows: date of birth 1975 JAN 25. Rdn to Amn,
and 30 days extra duty. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

e. Additional: none.

£. CM: none.

g. Record of SV: 95/11/21 - 97/07/29 Shaw AFB 4 (Initial)
(Discharged from Shaw AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (02) Yrs (01) Mos (17) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (01) Mos (04) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 01/07/14.
FD2001-0464
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I have a strong desire for an upgrade to my discharge due to the
following:
- Readmittance to the Armed Services.
- Potential of becoming a physician/officer.

- My own personal pride.

ATCH
none.

01/11/15/ia
DEPAR IMENT OF THE AIR FORGE
20th FIGHTER WING (ACC)

SHAW AIR FORCE BASE, SOUTH CAROLINA

 

15 Dec 97
MEMORANDUM FOR 20 FW/CC

FROM: 20 FW/JA -
504 ShawDr
Shaw AFB SC 29152-5028

SUBJECT: Legal Review of AFI 36-3208 Action nina,

1. Basis for Action: The Commander, 20th Aeromedical Dental Operations Squadron, recommended

that AmAQ@RARRAIIN. separated from the service with a general discharge for misconduct -- drug
abuse, pursuant to AFT 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5.54. The respondent is being processed

according to the notification procedure.

97, wronpfully used marijuana, for which he was administered Article 15 nonjudicial

2. @ ‘The file reflects that on divers occasions between on or about 6 Apr 96 and on or about 30 Sep
punishment action on 4 Dec 97.

3. In addition to the above listed bases for this actio RINE also reflects the following
misconduct: Between on or about 6 Apr 96 and on or about 30 Sep 97, aE: con fully and
falsely altered by changing the reverse side, a military identification card by changing the birth date, for
which he was administered Article 15 nonjudicial punishment action on 4 Dec 97.

4. Respondent's Submission QR consulted military counsel, and elected to submit matters for
your consideration, which are located at Tab 4.

5. Errors and Inegularities: The file contains no errors or irregularities.
6. Conclusions and Recommendations:

a. This file is legally sufficient to support a discharge, pursuant to AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section H,
paragraph 5.54.

b. The respondent could receive an honorable or general discharge. The commander has
recommended the respondent receive a general discharge. 1 concur with this recommendation. According
to the criteria set forth in AFI 36-3208, a general discharge is appropriate when the negative aspects of a
mnemiber’s service outweigh the positive. In this casey, actions constitute a significant
deviation from the conduct expected of airmen. When balanced against his otherwise average record, it is
clear that a general service characterization is appropriate.

c. Because the respondent is being discharged for drug abuse, he is ineligible for probation and
rehabilitation.

d. As the Special Court-Martial Convening pauboety in this case, you have the followang options:

qd) Recommend the respondent be retained in the Air Force if you make findings of fact
consistent with the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.55.2.1, and forward this case to the General
Court-Martial Convening Authority (9 AF/CC) for his action;

Hobal Pourer SFox Amentoa
(2) Direct the respondent be discharged with a general discharge, without probation and
rehabilitation;

(3) Recommend the respondent be separated with an honorable discharge, without probation and
rehabilitation, and forward this case to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority
(9 AF/CC) for his action; or,

(4) Direct this case be reinitiated pursuant to the board hearing procedures of AFI 36-3208,
chapter 6, section C, if you feel a discharge under other than honorable conditions is warranted.

7. Recommendations: I recommend you separate the respondent with a general discharge, without
probation and rehabilitation.

 
   

Staff Judge Advocate

Attachment
Case File
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
20th FIGHTER WING (ACC)

SHAW AIR FORCE 8ASE, SOUTH CAROLINA

 

10 Dec 97

MEMORANDUM FoR AM agate iinegiagigea

FROM: 20 ADOS/CC
431 Meadowlark St
Shaw AFB SC 29152-5019

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1, Lam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct -- drug abuse.
The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5.54, If
my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable, general, or under other
than honorable conditions. I am recommending that your service be characterized as general.

2. My reason for this action is that on divers occasions between on or about 6 Apr 96 and on or about 30
Sep 97, you wrongfully uscd marijuana. Also, between on or about 6 Apr 96 and on or about 30 Sep 97,
you wrongfully and falsely altered by changing the reverse side, a military identification card by changing
the birth date, for which you were administered Article 15 nonjudicial punishment action on 4 Dec 97.

Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are
attached, ‘The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide
whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, and if you are discharged, how your service
will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.

3. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. I have
made an appointment for you to cons al: Defense Counsel, 668-2437, at

building 321, on 12 Dec 97 at 0830 hours. You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense,

4. You have the right to submit statements in-your own behalf. Any statements you want the separation
authority to consider must reach me within three duty days of receipt of the notification memorandum,
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will forward them to the separation
authority.

5. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a
waiver of your right to do so.

6. You must report, in uniform, to the Shaw AFB Hospital, Physical Examinations Section, ASAP, fora
medical examinalion. ,

7. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy of AFI
36-3208 is available for your use in the orderly room,

8. The Air Force is entitled to recoup a portion of educational assistance, special pay, or bonus monies
which you received, if any, if you separate before completing the period of active duty you agreed to serve.
This recoupment applies whether you voluntarily separate or are involuntarily separated. Recoupment

- will apply regardless of the basis for involuntary discharge if the reason is not homosexual conduct. The
recoupment in al! cases is an amount that bears the same ratio to the total cost provided to you as the
unserved portion of active duly bears to the total period of active duty you agreed to serve. If you dispute
that you are indebted for educational assistance, a board or other authority will make findings and
recommendations concerning the validity of the indebtedness.

Global Pourer Sfor Amertaa
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to mej

  

2 Attachments
1. Documents in Support of Discharge
a. AF Form 3070, 4 Dec 97
b. AF Form 116
~ c. Amn Adams' F
d. AF Form 116
e. AF Form 116
2. Airman's Receipt o

 
 
  
 
 
 
  
  

0 Sep 97

0 Sep 97
0 Sep 97
otification Memorandum

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00062

    Original file (FD01-00062.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 Apr 99, Commander, 60 SUPS, initiated separation action against Respondent pursuant to d 5.54, for Misconduct, Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and Drug Section Abuse. Recommendation: Discharge Respondent with a general discharge without P&R, by signing the appropriate letter at Attachment 1, utilizing paragraph 5.54 as the primary reason for discharge. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct, Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and Drug Abuse,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0187

    Original file (FD2002-0187.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE HUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 12002-0187 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Retention Criteria and Consideration 02/08/08/cer ED'2002~- WET DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 47H FIGHTER WING (ACC) SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE NC 9 January 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR 4 FW/CC FROM: 4 FW/JA SUBJECT: Legal Review—-Discharge Under AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, Paragraph 5.54, Ann SAD. A member found to have abused drugs will be...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00096

    Original file (FD2003-00096.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES A93.09 INDEX NUMBER : EXHIBITS SUBMITTED, 10, THE BOARD A67,90 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN ad Vn TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL [YES | No | x VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x xX xX x LETTER OF NOTIFICATION CASE NUMBER BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00065

    Original file (FD01-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00065 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Background Information: The respondent has more than six years military service, therefore he is entitled to an administrative discharge board hearing. Based on the respondent’s record, a General discharge is appropriate when characterizing the respondent’s overall service record and drug abuse.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2001-0310

    Original file (FD2001-0310.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES NO Xx MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ISSUES A94.11 INDEX NUMBER A 67.70 3 7 : APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | 112102 FD2001-0310 | | COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0438

    Original file (FD2002-0438.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0438 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. LOR, 27 MAY 99 - Late for duty. LOR, 21 Jul 99 13, AF Form 3070, 13 Aug 99 14, LOC, 8 Nov 99 15.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00140

    Original file (FD2004-00140.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2000-0105

    Original file (FD2000-0105.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0105 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Such a discharge characterization, where the sole basis for discharge is a serious offense that resulted in conviction by a court-martial and the court declined to issue a punitive discharge, can only be approved by the Secretary of the Air Force (para 1.21.3). Recommendation: Discharge Respondent with a general discharge without PER.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0247

    Original file (FD2002-0247.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0247 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change of reason for discharge and change of reenlistment eligibility code. (Change Discharge to Honorable and Change the Reason & Authority for Discharge) Issue 1: My discharge was inequitable because the alleged disciplinary infractions were very minor in comparison with the meritorious aspects of my service record. For this Respondent...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00142

    Original file (FD2003-00142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) Es. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 2993-00142 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.