AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CAKE NUMBER
I FD-01-00075
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to General (under honorable conditions).
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge .
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The applicant's issues are listed in the attached brief
Issue 1. Applicant contends that he was young and immature at the time of his USAF service and should
not be punished indefinitely for his mistakes. The Board, in a thorough review of records, found that the
applicant received one Article 15, one Vacation of suspended punishment under Article 15, and three
Letters of Reprimand for various acts of misconduct (Le., failure to obey lawful orders; making false
official statements; operating a motor vehicle without a valid license, proper insurance or proper
registration; wrongfully attempting to purchase alcohol with a false I.D. while under age, etc.). The
Board opined that through these administrative actions and non-judicial punishment, the applicant had
ample opportunities to change his negativekepetitive behavior. The many offenses of the applicant,
although appearing minor in nature when analyzed individually, amounted to an overall serious problem
that could not be tolerated. The Board did recognize that the applicant was 19 years of age when the
discharge took place; however, after carefbl review it found no evidence that the applicant was immature
or did not know right from wrong. The Board opined that the applicant was as old as the vast majority
of first term members who properly adhere to the Air Force standards of conduct. The Board concluded
this issue was without merit.
Issue 2 applies to post-service activities. The Board recognized the applicant's efforts to be a good
citizen since his discharge from the service; however, no inequity or impropriety was found which would
iustie an upgrade of the discharge. The Board concluded that the character of discharge was
appropriate due to his misconduct.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided fill administrative due process.
[n view of the foregoing findings the Board fbrther concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis
For upgrade of discharge.
Qttachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
ED-01-00075
(Former AB)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a UOTH Disch fr USAF 93/12/21 UP AFR
para 5.4933 (Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline
Appeals for General Disch.
39-10,
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 74/01/07. Enlmt Age: 18 4/12. Disch Age: 19 11/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-95, E-83, G-98, M-90. PAFSC: 3N031 - Public Affairs Apprentice.
DAS: 93/01/29.
b. Prior Sv: AFRes 92/05/22 - 92/09/07 (3 months 16 days)(Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enld as AB 92/09/08 for 4 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 3 Mo 14 Das, all AMs.
b. Grade Status: ab - 93/09/27 (article 15, 93/09/27)
AMN - Unknown.
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15's:
(1) 93/09/27, Vacation, McConnell AFB, KS - Article 107.
You, did, o/a 8 Sep 93, with intent to deceive, make
to Captain ------ , an official statement, to wit: that
you hit a tree while riding a friend's dirt bike and
injured your knee, which statement was false in that
you injured your knee while riding your unregistered
motorcycle which you had previously been ordered not to
operate until it was properly registered, and was then
known by you to be so false; and you did, o/a 9 Sep 93,
with intent to deceive, make to MSgt ------ I an
official statement, to wit: that you did not know the
whereabouts of a ----- EOS camera, property of the
United States Air Force, which statement was false in
that you had said camera in your dormitory room, and
was then known by you to be so false. Thirty ( 3 0 ) days
restriction, and forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month
for two ( 2 ) months. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation)
(2) 93/11/18, McConnell AFB, KS - Article 134. You, did,
o/a 30 Jul 93, wrongfully attempt to purchase a keg of
beer, while under the age of twenty-one, such conduct
being of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed
.- .
... "
.. - . .
~
J?DOl-00075
forces. You, did, o/a 30 Jul 93, wrongfully represent
as your own a driver's license not issued to you for
the purpose of purchasing a keg of beer, such conduct
being of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed
forces. Rdn to AB, forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month
for two months (susp till 26 Mar 94), 30 days extra
duty, and 30 days restriction. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 05 NOV 93 - Failure to obey a lawful order.
LOR, 21 OCT 93 - Dereliction of duty.
LOR, 17 JUN 93 - Failure to obey a lawful order, operating
a motor vehicle without a valid license,
failure to properly register vehicle, and
making a false statement.
f. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: none.
(Discharged from McConnell AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, NDSM, BMTHGR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (7) Mos (0) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs (3) Mos (14) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 01/02/18.
(Change Discharge to General)
Dear Sir, I most respectfully ask for a review of my discharge from the United
States Air force under Other Than Honorable Conditions.
Since my discharge almost eight years ago, I have worked very hard to make
great strides in my personal and professional life since my discharge. Most
recently I was employed at the --------- as an Art Director and I now work for
a software company in my hometown. I feel disappointed on an almost daily
basis that I was not able to contribute my best to the USAF, but I have also
committed myself to not reproduce the same mistakes that led to my discharge.
I also respectfully request that several contributing factors be taken into
account concerning my discharge namely, I always and in full faith executed my
abilities for my position in the fullest extent. My problems were not with
the USAF itself of which I am very proud. Rather, they were of a personal
nature, and were the result of immature decisions that I now know were unwise.
ATCH
none.
01/03/13/ia
D E P A R T M E N T O F ':ti€
r,;R F O R C E
H E A D Q U A R T E R S E l G t l T H A I R F O R C E ( A C C )
B A R K S D A L E AIR F O R G E B A S E , L O U I S I A N A
ommendation to Involuntarily Discharge Airman Basi
384 MSSQ, McConnell Air Force Base
TO: 8AFKXP
8 AFKC
IN TURN
scharge action has been initiated against Airman Basic
Squadron, McConnell Air Force Base, for a pattern o
red an unconditional waiver of his right to an administrative
r, 384th Bomb Wing, recommends that the waiver be approved,
e separated with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that
he not be offered probation and rehabilitation. I have reviewed the file and concur with that
recommendation.
2. Authoritv. Airmen serve in the Regular Air Force for terms specified by Congress (10 USC
505), but Congress permits early separations under certain specified conditions and also delegates
to the Secretary of the Air Force authority to specie other such conditions (10 USC 1169). The
Secretary implemented that delegation at AFR 39-10, which governs this case. The Commander,
Eighth Air Force, must personally act on misconduct cases in which separation under other than
honorable conditions is appropriate. This is such a case.
3. Basis for Discharge. A pattern of misconduct, specifically conduct prejudicial to good order
and discipline, is cause for discharge under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47@). You must decide
whether the allegations are supported in fact, and, if so, whether they support discharge. Airman
been in the Air Force for only a year and four months. In that short period of time, he
-has
has accumulated an impressive record of misconduct. His transgressions include:
a. On 8 September 1993 making a false official statement to an officer by lying about how he
suffered an injury to cover up the fact that he was riding an unregistered motorcycle he had earlier
been ordered not to ride. Riding the motorcycle in the first place was also cited as a basis for
discharge. (Vacation of Suspended Art 15 Punishment)
b. On 15 October 1993 failing to complete an assignment as ordered and sleeping in instead.
(LOR)
c. On 30 July 1993 attempting to buy beer when underage and representing his brother's
driver's license as his own to facilitate doing so. He intended to supply beer to other underage
airmen in the dormitory. (Art 15)
d.
On 25 May 1993 riding an unregistered, uninsured motorcycle on base and failing
to obey an order to exit the base and not return riding the motorcycle.
In this pattern of misconduct, Airma
orders of his superiors, for the law and for the truth. His conduct supports discharge.
emonstrated a complete lack of regard for the
Matters Submitted bv the Respondent. On 1 December 1993 Airma
4.
unconditional waiver of his right to an administrative discharge board. He s
matters on his behalf.
an
er
Errors and Irregularities. There are no errors in the file substantively prejudicial to the
5 .
respondent.
Characterization. You must decide what characterization of service is appropriate if
6.
discharge is directed. The unit and wing commanders have recommended an under other than
honorable conditions discharge. Usually, discharges for a pattern of misconduct under paragraph
5-47 should be characterized as under other than honorable conditions. There is nothing in this
case which warrants departure from this standard. A general discharge may be appropriate when
the airman's service has been honest and faithfbl. Airma
as been neither. He ignored
the orders of his superior officers and did not hesitate to lie when it met his purposes. His
contempt for them and the Air Force earned him an under other than honorable conditions
characterization.
7.
Probation and Rehabilitation. Secretarial policies require the separation authority to
consider whether discharge should be suspended for a probationary period for rehabilitation.
AFR 39-10, paragraph 7-3, provides that probation should be possible for airmen who have the
capacity to be rehabilitated for continued military service or for completion of the current
enlistment and returned to civilian life without th
rehabilitation is inappropriate in this case. Airm
behavior and chose not to avail himself of them.
ischarge for cause. Probation and
s provided chances to amend his
8.
Options. You may:
a. - Direct that Airm-be
retained in the Air Force.
b.
disposition.
Disapprove the offered waiver and return the case for a hearing or other
C.
Accept the offered waiver and direct that Airma
e discharged with an
honorable, general or under other than honorable conditions discharge characterization, with or
without suspension of the discharge for a probationary period of rehabilitation.
Recommendation. I recommend that you approve the offered waiver and direct that
9.
Airma- be separated from the United States Air Force with an under other than honorable
conditions discharge and that discharge not be suspended for a probationary period of
rehabilitation. Execution of the discharge should be withheld until evidence is included in the file
that competent medical authority has determined Aim
o be fit for separation. If you
cting such a recommendation is at Tab 1.
Assistant Staff Judge Advocate
- _-_
I concur.
F
FROM:
384 BW/JA
SUBJ:
Involuntary Discharge -
"0: 384 BW/CC
1. FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES. On 29 Nov 93,
384th Mission Support Squadron,
recommend
discharged from the Un
f o r a pattern of m
i n
the milita
characterized as
any further rehabilitative e f f o r t s i n t h i s case.
2. EVIDENCE:
s A i r Force pursu
honorable conditio
<
7 D e c 93
commander of the
be
involuntarily
9-10, para 5-4713,
and discipline
$&vice be
ended against
a. Evidence
since 8 Sep 92.
involved i n one incident of misconduct a f t e r another.
f o r the Government.
I n t h a t short per
4 - - -
as only been i n the A i r Force
, he has consistently been
a f t e r discovering
(1) On 25 Nay 93,
motorcycle without a license o r insurance,
respondent
returning it t o base.
a
A s a r e s u l t of t h i s misconduct,
which was placed i n an unfavorable information f i l e .
false statement concerning h i s f a i l u r e
t h a t he was operating h i s
the security police ordered the
insure h i s motorcycle p r i o r t o
but a l s o made
t o accomplish these required tasks.
the respondent received a l e t t e r of reprimand
Not only did he f a i l t o do these things,
t o properly register,
license and
t o a
t o purchase a keg o
license. Subsequent w
( 2 ) On 30 J u l 93, the respondent collected money from unknown friends
liquor store, he
e r using h i s brother's old
the Security
indicated
the respondent has consumed alcohol and purchased
f o r other underage airmen on multiple occasions. For t h i s offense,
i n the dormitory and went
attempted
driver's
Police
alcohol
the respondent received nonjudicial punishment.
tore. A t the
conducted by
t h a t
(3) On 15 O c t 93,
the squadron first sergeant gave the respondent the
assignment of stuffing envelopes with questionnaires and them delivering them
t o the Family Support Center. This was an additional duty imposed as a r e s u l t
t h i s duty as
of h i s previous nonjudicial punishment.
A s a result
ordered,
of t h i s misconduct, t h e respondent received another letter of reprimand.
Instead of performing
the respondent was found sleeping i n h i s room a t 0900.
action
( 4 ) Finally,
f o r t h e same offense,
on o r about 8 Sep 93, despite previous disciplinary
the respondent once again violated an order as
ithout -a propeg m n s e ,
n t received a l e t t e r of
the respondent was involved i n an accident on
t h i s occasion. When asked how he became injured, he made a f a l s e o f f i c i a l
t h a t he h i t a tree while riding a friend's d i r t bike. Following
statement
t o Airman Basic was
t h i s offense,
the rank of A i r m a n Basic, which
vacated,
action w a s included i n the respondent's unfavorable information f i l e .
is rnotorcycl
is, the res
suspended reduction
the respondent t o
thus reducing
respondent's
the
b.
aived his right to submit
Evidence for the Respondent.
ever, he did submit an
written matters f o r your conside
unconditional waiver of his right to an administrative discharge board.
3. DISCUSSION :
a. According to AFR 39-10, para 6-2b(2), airmen are also entitled to an
administrative discharge board if their commander recommends they receive an
under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, that right may
be waived conditionally or unconditionally. In this case, as stated above,
the respondent submitted an unconditional waiver of this right. In
other words, the respondent has waived this right regardless of the
characterization of discharge recommended.
b. AFR 39-10, para 5-45a. states that under normal conditions,
than
such as this one, should
discharges under para 5-47,
has
honorable conditions. The commander in this case,
recommended an under other than honorable conditions di
9-10,
para 1-18c, states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge may
be appropriate "when the reason for separation is based on a pattern of
behavior ... that constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected
of airmen." The respondent's conduct in this case clearly falls within these
requirements. His behavior since entering the Air Force fails to even come
close to the level of conduct we expect from airmen.
4. OPINION AND RE-NDATION.
factually and legally sufficient to support
AB .Illllilr be involuntarily discharged from
than honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, I believe
recommend to the separation authority, 8 AF/CC, that he accept
unconditional waiver request and separate him with an under other than
e evidence in the file is
recommendation that
with an under other
In my opinion
1'
- -
DEPARTMENT OF TIE AIR FORCE
WXIQlJARTERS 384TH BOMB WING (ACC:)
AIR 1;ORcE. BASE, KANSAS
-1.
FROM: MSSQ/CC:
SUBJ: Notification Letter--Board Hearing
2 9 NOV 1993
ecommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for
of Misconduct-Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline
according to AFR 39-10, under the provisions of para 5-47b. Copies of the
documents to be forwarded to the separation authority to support this
recommendation are attached.
2 . My reasons for this action are:
n or about 8 Sep 93, make a false official statement to Capt
telling him that you hit a tree while riding a friend’s
red your knee, which statement was false in that you injured
your knee while riding your unregistered motorcycle which you had previously
been ordered not to operate until i t was properly registered, as evidenced by
an AF Form 366, Record of Proceedings of Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial
Punishment, 19 Nov 93 and an AF Form 1058, Unfavorable Information File
Action, 15 Nov 93.
b. You did, on or about 8 Sep 93, fail to obey a lawful order given to
not to ride your motorcycle until i t was properly
d a valid driver’s license, as evidenced by a Letter
of Reprimand, 5 Nov 93.
c. You did, on or about 15 Oct 93, fail to take questionnaires to the
Family Support Center and instead were found sleeping in your room, as
evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand, 21 Oct 93.
d. You did, on or about 30 Jul 9 3 , wrongfully attempt to purchase a keg
of beer, while under the age of 21, as evidenced by an AF Form 3070, Record of
Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, 4 Oct 93 and an AF Form 1058, 26 Oct 93.
e. You did, on or about 30 Jul 93, wrongfully represent as your own a
- beer, as evidenced by an AF Form 3070, 4 Oct 93 and an AF Form 1058, 26 Oct
- driver’s license not issued to you for the purpose of purchasing a keg QJ-
93.
f. You did, on or about 25 May 93, fail to obey a lawful order to exit
the base and not return riding your motorcycle without proper credentials, as
evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand, 17 Jun 93 and an AF Form 1058, 25 Jun 93.
g . You did, on or about 25 May 93. operate a motor vehicle without a
valid license or proper insurance, failed to properly register your vehicle
and made a false official statement. as evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand, 17
Jun 93 and an AF Form 1058, 25 Jun 93.
3 . This action could result in your separation with an under other than
honorable conditions discharge. I am recommending that you receive an under
other than honorable conditions discharge. The commander exercising SPCM
jurisdiction or a higher authority will make the final decision in this
matter. I f you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the
Air Force. -
4. You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c . Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of,
the board hearing.
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making
a decision to waive any of your rights.
5 . You have been scheduled for two mandatory medical examinations at the
384th Medical Group. You are to report to the Physical Exams Section at 0715
on 1 Dec 93 and Primary Care at 1500 on 3 Dec 93. Bring your records to both
appointments. If you wear glasses, bring them with you. I f you wear
contacts, have them out 12 hours prior to both appointments.
Defense Counsel. Bldg 328,
6. Military legal counsel, Capt-Area
ext 4375, has been obtained to assist you. An a pointrnent has been scheduled
for you to consult her on 1 h C .
appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the
active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to
AFR 111-1. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ
civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay expenses incident to the
employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel. if employed, must be
readily available.
. Instead of the
at
-
7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays,
specifying the-rights you choose to exercise. The statement nwst be si&
- the presence o m o u r counsel who also will sign it.
I f you waive your right
to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, you ray submit written
statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements t o the discharge
authority with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If
you fail to respond, your failure will constitute a waiver of the right to the
board hearing .
in
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal i s covered By the Privacy
Act Statement as explained in AFR 39-10, attachment 2 . A copy of AFR 39-1.0
i s
available for your use in yoiir orderly room.
9 . Execute the attached acknowledgment and return i t to me immediately.
Commander
*
9 Atch
1 . AF Form 366, 19 Nov 93
2. AF Form 1058. 15 Nov 93
3 . LOR, 5 Nov 93
4 . LOR, 21 Oct 93
5 . AF Form 3070. 4 Oct 93
6 . AF Form 1058. 26 Oct 93
7. LOR, 17 Jun 93
8 . AF Form 1058. 25 Jun 93
9 . Receipt of Notification Ltr
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00363
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of misconduct. You did, on or about 2 Jun 94, f'ail to obey a direct order to make a payment andlor obtain a receipt for payment on your Army, Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) Deferred Payment Plan @PP) account, and made false statements to your flight NCOIC concerning your...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0387
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD02-0387 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. And, he received eight Records of Individual Counseling for reporting for mobility without proper equipment, acting in an unprofessional manner, negligent in the performance of duties, dereliction of duty (twice), late for work (three times), leaving a place of duty without authority, failure to complete assigned duties, and for receiving a...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00440
(attachment !we ! (Attachment 14). (Attachment 15).
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00190
Copies of Disciplinary Infractions Letters With Rebuttals. On or about 19 Nov 04, you wore an earring off-duty, but on-base when it was unlawful to do so, For this misconduct, you received: (1) a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 1 Dec 04, which was filed in your Unfavorable Information File (UIF); and, (2) a Vacation of Suspended Punishment, dated 23 Dec 04, received from a prior Article 15, dated 8 Oct 04. b. I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Area Defense Counsel...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00173
~ - 1 AFHQ FOKM 0-2077, JAN 00 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHAKGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING.3HD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be uscd I 1 J AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-fl0173 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. You were, on 16 Dec 02, derelict in the performance of your duties in that fail to get your hair cut before reporting for duty....
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0324
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 60 (EF-V2) Previous edition will b CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0324 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropr|fty or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 00/08/04, McConnell AFB, KS - Article 86.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0078
Because the Board did not recommend an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge, you do not have this option of directing this type of discharge. Considering all of the evidence in ommendation of the board, I recommend that you sign the attached letter directing tha discharged from the United States Air Force with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge pursuant to AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.1, without hrther probation and rehabilitation. The discharge board or, the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00375
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DlAIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00375 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. For this misconduct you received an AETC Form 174, Record of Individual...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00460
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD~2006~00460 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Vacation, two Letters of Reprimand, and three AF Form 341 s for misconduct. This in evidenced by an Air Force Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 18 February 1992 (Atch 4).
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00294
Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, M D (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1. Applicant's Issue. b. I previously submitted an application on (Enter Date) and I a m completing this f ~ r m in order to submit additional issues.