I
/ NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (L,AS'I., FIRST R1IDDI.E INI'I'I.4L)
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 GRADE
I AFSNISSAN
1
1
I'I.YPE GEN
I
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
1
--
MEMRER SI'TTING
SHA "L,
X
RECORD REVIEW
I
1
ORGANUATION O F ( (IUNSEI,
VWI E OF THE BOARD
/X;C
1 OTHER
-.
[ DENY
EXHIRII'S SUBMITTED 'rO THE BOARD
-
--
I.-
ORIIEK APPOINTINCi TI-IE BOARD
I.E'ITER O F N(:)'I'IFICATION
BRIEF OI: PERSONNEL FILE,
COUNSEL'S REI.EASE T O THF: BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXRIBITS S I . I D M ~ T ~ T I M E
PERSONAL AF'PEAKANCE
I TAPE KECORDINC; OF PERSONAI. APPEARANCE
01'
".
..
IILARING O A l t
CASE NllMRFR
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
subinit an application to the AFBCM R
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
S M I M R B R
550 C STXEET WEST, SlJlTE 40
RANDOLPI-1 AFB, TX 78 150-4742
SECRETARY O F TIIE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COlJNClL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING. 3RD FI.OOR
ANDRE\\'S AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSIONAL RATIONALE
LASE NllMBEH
!
FD-20U5-00294
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgradc of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appcarance before thc Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declincd to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and thc factors Icading to the dischargc.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the cvidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. 'I'he records indicated the
applicant received three Lettcrs of Reprimand, two Unfavorable Information files and was placed on the
Co~ltrol Roster for misuse of his government travel card and for contributing to the delinqueiicy of minors by
allowing them to use his rcsidence for illcgal drug use. 'l'he DRB opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to changc his negative behavior. The Board concluded the
nlisconduct was a significant depariure from conduct expected of all military mcrnbers. The characterization
of the discharge received by the applicant was Sound to be appropriate. The DRB was plcased to see that thc
applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, no incquity or impropriety in his discharge was
suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the inisconduct of the applicant
appropriately characterized his tcrm of service.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Revicw Board concludes that the discharge was consistent wilh lhc
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Hoard further concludes that there exists no legal or cquitablc basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, M D
(Former SRA) (HGH SRA)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Robins AFB, GA on 4 Aug 95 UP
AFI 36-3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals
for Honorable Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 1 Jan 72; Enlmt Age: 20 0/12. DischAge-:--23 7/12. Educ: HS DIPL;
AFQT: N/A. A-95, E-88, G-86, M-54. PAFSC: 2P051 - Precision Measurement
Equipment Lab Journeyman. DAS: 30 Mar 94.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 17 Jan 92 - 17 Feb 92 (1 month 1 day)(Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 18 Feb 92 for 6 years. Svd: 03 Yrs 05 Mo 17 Das, all
AMS .
b. Grade Status: SrA - 1 Aug 94
A1C - 1 Apr 92
c. Time Lost: None
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: LOR/UIF, 26 MAY 95 - Fraudulently receiving a larger
Overseas Housing Allowance then
authorized.
LOR/UIF, 18 MAY 95 - Allowing teenagers to use his
CR, 18 MAY 95 - For being derelict in his responsibilities.
LOR/UIF, 09 MAR 95 - Misused his government issued American
residence for illegal drug use.
Express and inappropriately withdrew
over $2,700 in cash advance.
f . CM: None.
g . Record of SV: 18 Feb 92 - 17 Oct 93 Holloman AFB 4 (Initial)
18 Oct 93 - 14 Feb 94 Holloman AFB 4 (CRO)
15 Feb 94 - 14 Feb 95 RAF Lakenheath 5 (Annual)
h. Awards & Decs: AFOUA W/1 OLC, AFGCM, NDSM, AFTR.
i. Stmt of S v : TMS: (03) Yrs (06) Mos (18) Das
TAMS: (03) Yrs (05) Mos (17) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 18 Jul 05.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issue.
2. Recommendation for Decoration/Award, (DA Fm 638).
3. Citation for Army Commendation Medal.
4. Certificate Squadron Leadership School.
3. SUPPQRTING DOCUMENTS (X as applicable) (Please print name and social security number on each documentl
I
I
1 a. Will not be submitted. Please complete review based on available service records.
I
I
b. Will be submitted within 60 days.
c. Will be submitted within
days.
d. Are listed below and are attached to this application: (Continue on a plain sheet of paper if more
space is needed.)
(1) DOCUMENT 1.
BXMY c-HION
MEDAL RECOMMENDATION AND AWABD, GA NATIOHIL GUARD
(2) DOCUMENT 2:
SQUADRON LEADERSHIP SCHOOL CERTIFICATE, US AIR FORCE AUXIL'IlRY/CIVIL AIR PATROL
(3) DOCUMENT 3:
TRANSCRIPT, EMERY-RIDDLE AEROI?AUTICII. UNIVERSITY, DISTANCE LE4RNlNc
8. ISSUES. The Board will consider any issue submitted by you prior to closing the case for deliberation. The
Board also will review the case t o determine whether there are any issues which provide a basis for
upgrading your discharge. However, the Board is not required t o respond in writing t o issues of concern
t o you unless those issues are listed or incorporated by specific reference below, Read the instructions
carefully that pertain to block 8 prior t o completing this part of the application.
If you need more space,
submit additional issues o n an attachment.
': MY GENERAL UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIDNS DISCHARGE WAS IXEQUIWLE AS I T w ~ S B k X D
ON AN I S O I L E D INCIDENT DlJRIl?G MY ENLISTMENT PERIOD OF ACTIVE DUTY SEKVICE WITH NO 0'11816R:
ADVERSE &CTPONS HAVING OCCUlWJ).
ISSUE 2: 1: AM m
Y
ENLISTED IN TKE GEORGIA ARMY NATIONAL GUNID, AND W I L L BE DUE: FOR A
RE-ENLIS-
A I R PATROL/US AIR FORCE AUXILIARY (SKR GA-116) SINCE 2001. I AM ALSO A DEPUTY WITH TJiE
HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE I N W€DOBOUGXI. GA,
WHICH I INTEND TO SECURE. 1 EWVE ALSO BEEN A VOLUNTEER OFPICER W TEE CIVIL
ISSUE 3: I CONTRIBUTED TEE APPROPgUTE FUNDS 'WHllE ACTIVE DUTY TOWWS, THE MONTGUMERY G. I.
BILL, AND MY D I S ~ G E P-S
TUITION ASSISTANCE WITILE PURSUMG MY D E W E AT JXBRY-RIDDLE AERONAITTICAL, I INTEND TO
BECOME AN ARMY OFFICER THROUGH OFFICER CANRIDATE SCHOOL, AND I WISH TO COMPLETE HY DE-
TO ACEII13VE THIS. G.1- BILL F[TNDS WIU HELP l!E GREATLY IN THIS ENDEAVOUR,
ME FROM USING THESE F[TNDS,FI HAVE BEEN ACTIVELY USING ARMY
ISSUE 4:
I
1 a. Mark this block if you have listed additional issues as an attachment to this application.
b. I previously submitted an application on (Enter Date)
and I a m completing this f ~ r m
in order to submit additional issues.
c. The above issues supersede all previously submitted.
9. CERTIFICATION
I I make the foregoing statements as part of my application with full knowledge of the penalties involved for
willflrlly making a false statement. (U.S.Code, M e 78, Section 7007, provides a penalty as follows: A maximum
fine of $70,000 or maximum imprisonmenf of 5 vears, or both)
a. DATE (Year, Month, Day)
b. SIGNATURE
2005 07 18
ARMY
I
NAW & MARINE CORPS' I
LICABLE ADDRESS BELOW
AIR FORCE
CO, USARPAC
9 7 0 0 Page Blvd.
St. Louis, M O 631 32-5200
NAVAL Discharge Review
801 No. Randolph St.
Arlington, VA 22203-1997
AFMPCiMPCDOAl
Randolph AFB, TX 781 50-6001
I
COASTGUARD
Commandant (G-PE-1)
U.S. Coast Guard Hedq
Washington, DC 20593-0001
DD Form 293(JF). FEB 89
Previous editions ore obsolete
I
1
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
48TH FIGHTER WING (USAFE)
23 June 1995
FROM: 48 CRSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct--Minor
Disciplinary Infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49.
If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or general. I am
recommending that your service be characterized as general.
. .
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On 26 May 1995, you received a LOR for ffaud against the government, in that, you failed to
accurately report that you did at times share your residence with mother military member, thus
decreasing your Overseas IIousing Allowance (OHA), and claiming to pay all utilities yourself, whiIe
receiving partial financial assistance for the electric bill from your military roomate. This LOR dated 26
May 1995, was added to your existing Unfavorable Information File (XIIF), dated 30 May 1995.
b. On 18 May 1995, you received a LOR for being derelict in your responsibilities, in that, several
teenagers were found to have been using iIIegal drugs in your residence at 6 The Cedars, Lakenheath
Village. This LOR, dated 18 May 1995, was added to your UlT and placed you on the Control Roster,
dated 22 May 1995.
c. On 9 March 1995, you received a LOR for being dereIict in the performance of your duties, in that,
you misused your government issued American Express Card and inappropriately withdrew over $2,700
in cash advances. This LOR, dated 9 March 1995, established a UIF, dated 13 March 1995.
Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation
are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authority will decide whether
you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are discharged, how your service will be
characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
3. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. I have
at building 976, ext 3608, on 23 June
made an appointmetlt for you to consul-
1995,0930 hours. You inay consult civilian counsel at your own expense.
4. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by 28 June 1995, unless you request and receive an
extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation authority.
5. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a
waiver of your right to do so.
6. You've already completed your medical examination, on 7 June 1995.
7. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act Statement of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at the Unit Orderly Room or the Area Defense Counsel
Office.
Commander
Attachments:
1. AF 1058, dtd 30 May 1995
2. LOR, dtd 26 May 1995
3. OSI report, dtd 1 May 1995
4. AF 1058, dtd 22 May 1995
5. LOR, dtd 18 May 1995
6. OSI report, 3 April 1995
7. AF 1058, dtd 13 March 1995
8. LOR, dtd 9 March 1995
9. Amn's Receipt of Notification Memorandum
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00468
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE M V I E W BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00468 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, change the reason and authority for the discharge, and change the reenlistment code. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. LOR, 26 MAY 95 - Dereliction of duty.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00173
~ - 1 AFHQ FOKM 0-2077, JAN 00 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHAKGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING.3HD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be uscd I 1 J AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-fl0173 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. You were, on 16 Dec 02, derelict in the performance of your duties in that fail to get your hair cut before reporting for duty....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00100
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR Naines and votes will be made available to thc applicant at the applicant's request. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AMN) 1. For this offense, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 22 Jan 02. f. On 17 Jan 02, you did, without authority fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00473
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. A1C-(EPR Indicates): 16 Mar 93-15 Nov 94. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 8 May 96 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00378
MD 20762-7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I I I I I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00378 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AlC) (HGH S M ) 1. Applicant's Issues.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00011
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0011 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Applicant's Rebuttal to Discharge w/20 Atchs. Attachments: Letter of Reprimand dated 30 Oct 96 .
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00393
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. LOR, 27 OCT 94 - Speeding. For this misconduct you received a LOR on 27 Oct 94. d. Between on or about 5 Aug 94 and 21 Oct 94, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the time prescribed on 3 separate occasions.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00308
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NllMRFR FD-2006-00308 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. SGQF LTR, 25 OCT 91 - Returned check notification.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00500
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 AFSNRSAN 1 -..-............., RECORDREVIEW I ' TYPE GEN COUNSEL YES No I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 I SRA I I I IX NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1 2 3 4 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0239
1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 5 FEB 03 FD2002-0239 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN al OT. BRBIBITS SUBMITED IQTHE BOARD Ce A93.01 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 Tl" BRIEE OF PERSONNEL FILE — COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE r TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING a 2...