AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02094
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
IN THE MATTER OF:
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His retirement year ending 23 June 2011 be changed from an
unsatisfactory Federal service year to a satisfactory Federal
service year by moving his 6 and 7 March 2010 Unit Training
Assembly (UTA) points to 10 and 11 July 2010.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His unit had their Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI)
18 through 21 March 2010 and to make up for this the unit did not
have drill in April or July 2010. In November 2010, he was
diagnosed with skin cancer and missed drills in November 2010 and
February 2011. By missing these drills (July, November and
February) his 2010 Retention and Retirement (R&R) year ended with
47 points – 3 points short of a good year towards retirement.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard in
the grade of technical sergeant.
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. DPTS states the applicant’s point
history shows he received 2 paid active duty points for 6 through
7 March 2010. The 2 active duty points for 6 through 7 March
2010, along with the 8 inactive duty training points for 4 drill
days during the ORI were recorded in the applicant’s record for
the retirement year ending 23 June 2010, which was a satisfactory
Federal service year.
For retirement year ending 23 June 2011, the applicant performed
2 drills days each for 8 months which equaled 32 inactive duty
training points. Since a weekend drill was not scheduled for
July 2010, no points were recorded. Subsequently, the applicant
did not perform drills for August 2010, November 2010 and
February 2011, which were on the schedule. Also, no active duty
annual tour days were performed during his unsatisfactory R&R
year.
The applicant did not receive a satisfactory service year because
he did not participate for the minimum number of points. There
was no error or injustice. Retirement points cannot be
rearranged in the calendar to create a satisfactory year.
Retirement points are recorded on the day they are performed.
The duty on 6 through 7 March 2010 was not scheduled as a unit
training assembly, but was scheduled as active duty for special
training for 1 point each day, which the member received. The
applicant only completed 7 annual tour days during fiscal year
2011, none of which occurred in the R/R year. The applicant did
not participate during 3 of the possible schedule drill weekends,
which adds up to 12 possible points. No physical profile
occurred or work restrictions documented. The applicant
apparently did not coordinate with his unit to request equivalent
training or non-pay inactive training duty or any options he may
have had to ensure he would receive a satisfactory service year.
The DPTS complete evaluation is at Exhibit B
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 17 July 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit
C). As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with
2
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error
or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02094 in Executive Session on 15 February 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02094 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 May 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 28 June 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 July 2012.
3
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01805
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01805 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four (4) additional points for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 30 Jul 09. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends approval, stating, in part, that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04147
On 4 October 2010, he transferred from the Air Force (AF) Reserve to the Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of his request, the applicant submits a letter dated 6 March 2014, that states he concurs with the ARPC/DPTS...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01030
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his transfer from active duty to the Air Force Reserve, the Military Personnel Flight advised him that by completing his normal training requirement he would be able to acquire enough points to be credited with a good year. The well-intentioned course of action led to an unsatisfactory year of service for RYE Feb 96. Accordingly, we recommend the applicants record be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02082
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four inactive duty training (IDT) points for duty he performed in Feb 10. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00458
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00458 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to reflect 52 retirement points for the year 6 Sep 11 - 5 Sep 12 and satisfactory service for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 17 Aug 12. DPTS states that the initial audit, prior service record capture, and resulting R/R...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01725
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01725 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited for pay and points for Unit Training Assemblies (UTAs) he completed during the months of Feb, Mar, Apr, and May 2008. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05693
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. He could have used this time to earn the 33 non-paid points he needed to complete a satisfactory years of service for RYE 17 Dec 12. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Feb 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04010
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. To verify and ensure all possible participation was captured and recorded on the AF Form 526, ARPC obtained pay records which correspond exactly to the dates and number of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02322
The Air Force now claims that she earned the additional points; however, they cannot be credited because she was no longer in the bonus program. She served in the Air Force specialty expressly stated in her contract (46N1) when earning the additional 12 points prior to Mar 09 and she should be credited with the additional 12 points. Her next duty performance was recorded on 12 Aug 06. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Aug 10, w/atchs.