Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00458
Original file (BC-2013-00458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
                RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00458
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her record be corrected to reflect 52 retirement points for the 
year 6 Sep 11 - 5 Sep 12 and satisfactory service for the 
Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 17 Aug 12.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her original Retention/Retirement (R/R) date of 6 Sep 05 was 
presumed correct.  On 13 Oct 11, an Air Force audit changed it 
to reflect 18 Aug 05.

This will deprive her of the points she earned towards a good 
year in 2011-2012, and ultimately a year of service toward 
retirement, through no fault of her own.

On 6 Sep 11, she left active duty and transferred to the Air 
Force Reserve, it was her knowledge that she officially joined 
the Air Force as of 6 Sep 05.  Her Base Individual Mobilization 
Augmentee Administrator (BIMAA) sent her a welcome letter 
reflecting 6 Sep 11 as her official R/R date.  On 20 Sep 11, she 
verified this in Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF) to be 
accurate.

On 13 Oct 11, an audit was performed and her R/R date was 
changed to reflect a delayed entry date of 18 Aug 05, changing 
her R/R dates.

She performed an annual tour from 12 Aug to 24 Aug 12 and 
completed Inactive Duty Training (IDT) days through 28 Sep 12.

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of an 
Air National Guard/Air Force Reserve (ANG/USAFR) Point Credit 
Summary, dated 23 Jan 13, her enlistment documents, and a 
Newcomer Welcome Letter. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program 
(DEP) on 18 Aug 05, and entered active duty in the Regular Air 
Force on 6 Sep 05.

Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force which is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial.  DPTS states that the initial 
audit, prior service record capture, and resulting R/R date 
change did not affect the outcome of whether or not the 
applicant received a satisfactory year of service, nor was the 
member deprived of any retirement points.  

Supposing the R/R date was 6 Sep 05; the total number of 
retirement points earned would only equal 40 points, which is 
still short of a satisfactory service year.  The applicant did 
not receive a satisfactory year because she failed to 
participate.  The applicant’s assertions are not correct because 
she based her argument on a fiscal year versus a R/R year.  The 
applicant’s record is not in error nor has any injustice 
occurred.

ARPC has the responsibility to expand prior service history into 
the Point Credit Accounting and Reporting System (PCARS).  After 
one month in the Ready Reserve, the applicant’s service history 
was captured into PCARS and her R/R date was officially 
established, in accordance with AFI 36-2254, Volume, Reserve 
Personnel Participation, Table 2.4., as 18 Aug 05, which was the 
initial date she entered uniform service.

The complete DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 8 Mar 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After a 
thorough review of the available evidence, we are not persuaded 
that the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. 
We note the applicant’s assertion that her Retention/Retirement 
(R/R) date was changed without her knowledge thereby depriving 
her of a satisfactory year of service for retirement year ending 
2012.  However, according to ARPC/DPTS, the initial audit, prior 
service record capture, and resulting R/R date change did not 
affect the outcome of whether or not she received a satisfactory 
year of service, nor was she deprived of any points.  As such, 
we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale 
expressed in the Air Force advisory opinion nor has she met her 
burden of establishing the existence of an error or an 
injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we concur with the comments provided by ARPC/DPTS and 
adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  In 
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2013-00458 in Executive Session on 29 Oct 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:


	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2013-00458 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 Jan 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 1 Mar 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Mar 13.



								
				Panel Chair






Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03487

    Original file (BC 2014 03487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03487 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be credited with a satisfactory year of Reserve service for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 17 Jan 11 to 16 Jan 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00431

    Original file (BC-2010-00431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This audit also generates a letter to the member informing them the audit resulted in changing their R/R date. Instead, she completed the requirements in good faith based on the information she had at the time. We note the applicant’s contention that she was not notified of the change of her R/R date; however, her original assignment order noted in the remarks section that “Your point history record has not been audited and your R&R date may change.” Following the audit of her record,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510

    Original file (BC 2013 04510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03045

    Original file (BC-2005-03045.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPP contends even if she had known of the R/R date change earlier and had the opportunity to schedule her AT dates prior to the new retirement year ending (RYE) date of 21 February 2005 the additional AD points would have resulted in her RYE 21 February 2005 to show only a total of 45 points and a year of unsatisfactory service. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02867

    Original file (BC 2013 02867.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02867 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded points for the period Jul 92 through Apr 95 and that each year be credited as a year of satisfactory service towards retirement. He was not in a point gaining activity nor was he able to earn retirement points during the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148

    Original file (BC 2013 05148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04004

    Original file (BC-2007-04004.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Because she was working under the assumption that her R/R date had changed to the date she started working as an ALO (11 August), her R/R year for 27 May 2006 to 26 May 2007 ended up being six (6) points shy of the 50 points required for a satisfactory year of service. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states she never received a copy of the Special Orders dated 12 Sep 06 in the mail or at her unit. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04010

    Original file (BC-2011-04010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. To verify and ensure all possible participation was captured and recorded on the AF Form 526, ARPC obtained pay records which correspond exactly to the dates and number of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0202016

    Original file (0202016.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the audit, the applicant's R/R was changed from 2 October to 14 June. The applicant was notified on 17 April 1999 about the change in his R/R date and that his points were being realigned to coincide with the 14 June R/R date. DPP further states the applicant was notified of the change in his R/R year date in April 1999 and he received an AF Form 526 for RYE 13 June 1999, and furthermore, the applicant had adequate time to earn points for the RYE 13 June 2000.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02234

    Original file (BC-2005-02234.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At or near the time he began accruing points, he was advised by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) that his R/R date was 1 October – the date he entered Reserve service. He has earned sufficient points for the R/R year ending 26 August 2005 to be considered a satisfactory year of Federal service. DPP’s complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...