RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02082
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be credited with four inactive duty training (IDT) points for
duty he performed in Feb 10.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He performed his monthly drill weekend in a temporary duty (TDY)
status, but his statement of service does not reflect he was
appropriately credited for this service.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of
documents extracted from the Virtual Military Personnel Flight
(vMPF) related to his point credit summary, a leave and earnings
statement (LES), a TDY order and travel voucher, and email
correspondence related to the matter under review.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System
(MilPDS) indicates the applicant currently serves in the Air
Force Reserve in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPT recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not
provided sufficient evidence of an error or injustice. The
applicant claims he completed IDT at Holloman AFB, NM on 6 and
7 Feb 10, one month before he was gained to his new unit.
Despite providing documentation of his intent to participate in
a unit training assembly (UTA) with his new unit, he failed to
provide proof of participation. He did however provide a
military LES that does not reflect IDT performance, uncertified
travel orders and an incomplete travel voucher to support his
claim. While the email correspondence provided indicates that
he traveled to Holloman AFB on 5 Feb 10, he has provided no
evidence that he completed the IDT. On 8 Aug 11, the applicant
was asked to provide proof that he performed the IDT he is
claiming and, as of 22 Nov 11, he has not responded. Such proof
would have included AF Forms 40A, Unit Training Assembly
Processing System (UTAPS) documentation, or proof of pay.
Moreover, a review of the Reserve Component Pay System revealed
no change to the applicants pay record for 5 through 7 Feb 10.
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPT evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on
16 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After
careful consideration of applicant's request and the available
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions
stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by the
applicant. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied
rights to which he was entitled, appropriate regulations were
not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find
no basis to disturb the existing record.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02082 in Executive Session on 19 Jan 12, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 May 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPT, dated 5 Dec 11, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05436
Before issuing the LOR, the OG/CC requested a copy of the LOR purportedly given to the applicant while performing duties at Tyndall AFB since there was no record of the LOR in the applicants personnel file. The OG/CC never received a copy of said LOR and therefore documented the applicants misconduct with the LOR, dated 18 Sep 10. A complete copy of the AFRC/JA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01725
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01725 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited for pay and points for Unit Training Assemblies (UTAs) he completed during the months of Feb, Mar, Apr, and May 2008. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04102
On 22 Jan 03, the applicant was reduced in grade from technical sergeant to staff sergeant, with a new date of rank of 21 Nov 02, as a result of an Article 15, due to government travel card (GTC) misuse. SAFPC has reviewed this application, and determined the applicant served satisfactorily in the grade of technical sergeant and should be advanced on the retired list in the grade of technical sergeant when he reaches 30 years of active service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01805
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01805 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four (4) additional points for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 30 Jul 09. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends approval, stating, in part, that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01030
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his transfer from active duty to the Air Force Reserve, the Military Personnel Flight advised him that by completing his normal training requirement he would be able to acquire enough points to be credited with a good year. The well-intentioned course of action led to an unsatisfactory year of service for RYE Feb 96. Accordingly, we recommend the applicants record be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05693
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. He could have used this time to earn the 33 non-paid points he needed to complete a satisfactory years of service for RYE 17 Dec 12. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Feb 14.
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s counsel responded to the Air Force evaluation and indicates that he and the applicant believe that the documents presented by the applicant establish that a clear injustice occurred when the applicant received an Article 15 for allegedly being derelict in the performance of his duties. Counsel’s complete response is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05007
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflective of his continuous honorable reserve service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01232
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01232 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be reissued to incorporate multiple active duty tours from 22 Jun 71 through 21 Dec 71. On 30 Nov 06, the applicant submitted a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02819
In addition, the applicant did not perform the duty in RYE 3 Nov 09, he performed it in RYE Nov 08. To receive the participation credit he requests he would have been required to perform the duty between 4 Nov 08 and 3 Nov 09. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02819 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following...