Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04010
Original file (BC-2011-04010.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04010 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her records be corrected to reflect satisfactory service for 
Calendar Year (CY) 1987 through 1988. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She completed the entire year with more than 50 points, however 
she cannot provide an accurate number of Man-days she worked in 
addition to all Unit Training Assemblies (UTAs) she completed. 

 

Her house, which contained all of her service documentation, was 
nearly destroyed during Hurricane Andrew in 1992; therefore, her 
proof and documentation is limited. 

 

In Jan 87 she transferred from the 482nd Maintenance Squadron to 
the 70th Aerial Port Squadron during the Jan 87 UTA. 

 

After recovering from Hurricane Andrew she was able to recover 
some documents from CY 1987, which are included in her request. 
These documents show proof of her progress throughout that year. 

 

From 1988 to 2002 she took a break in service to have a family 
but quickly returned to service in 2002 to continue a proud and 
rewarding career in the Air Force. 

 

According to her Point Summary Report, (Service History) her 
total points were always higher than required. 

 

She wants the Board to consider her records as proof that she 
has maintained good standings before and after her break in 
service and hopes the Board will favorably consider her request. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides electronic 
communiqués, copies of Equipment receipt, Application For 
Reserve Forces Dependent ID Card, Career Development Course 
Completion, Personal Data Requirements, Order of the Sword 
selection letter, Appointment Letter, Enlisted Performance 
Reports, Individual Information Report and Point Summary Report. 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 


 

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserves in 
the grade of master sergeant (E-7). 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. DPTS states the applicant’s 
assertions are not correct because she based her argument on a 
CY versus the retention/retirement (R/R) year. For R/R year 
beginning 24 Jan 87 through 23 Jan 88, the applicant received an 
unsatisfactory Federal Service Year. AF Form 526, ANG/USAFR 
Point Credit Summary, shows her day-by-day participation and 
reflects 47 total retirement points. 

 

The applicant's supporting documentation does not provide any 
proof of additional active or inactive duty training that may be 
missing from her record. The point credit summary already 
includes ten Extension Course Institute points for the Personnel 
Technician Course 73270. 

 

She failed to present any proof showing she was denied 
participation or any documentation for additional active or 
inactive duty training. To verify and ensure all possible 
participation was captured and recorded on the AF Form 526, ARPC 
obtained pay records which correspond exactly to the dates and 
number of points on the summary. Both the summary and pay 
records indicate a five month period of nonparticipation from 
Jun through Oct 87. 

 

The complete DPTS evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 16 Dec 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 10 Apr 12, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 


 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-04010: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Aug 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFRC/DPTS, dated 6 Dec 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04160

    Original file (BC 2013 04160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As stated on the point credit summary, the member was instructed to review the summary and report errors within 30 days of receipt. However, the Board is willing to reconsider the applicant’s request should she produce the documentation to verify her participation during the missing dates. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 February 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01030

    Original file (BC-2011-01030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his transfer from active duty to the Air Force Reserve, the Military Personnel Flight advised him that by completing his normal training requirement he would be able to acquire enough points to be credited with a good year. The well-intentioned course of action led to an unsatisfactory year of service for RYE Feb 96. Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04510

    Original file (BC 2013 04510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04510 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Retention/Retirement Year Ending (RYE) in 2002 be credited with additional retirement points to reflect a satisfactory year toward retirement. STATEMENT OF FACTS: During the RYE 11 Jun 02, the applicant was credited with five active duty points, 24 Inactive Duty Training (IDT) points, 15 membership points,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02082

    Original file (BC-2011-02082.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with four inactive duty training (IDT) points for duty he performed in Feb 10. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00458

    Original file (BC-2013-00458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00458 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to reflect 52 retirement points for the year 6 Sep 11 - 5 Sep 12 and satisfactory service for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 17 Aug 12. DPTS states that the initial audit, prior service record capture, and resulting R/R...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-2004-00368

    Original file (BC-2004-00368.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, in accordance with Title 37, United States Code, Section 206[e], while a member may be allowed by their commander to perform duty to make up missed Unit Training Assemblies (UTA’s) for retirement points, the duty must be performed within their R/R, or anniversary, year. They state the member made up the time outside the parameters of the affected R/R year making the one point she earned attributable to her next R/R year of 30 January 2003 through 29 January 2004 instead of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05436

    Original file (BC 2012 05436.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Before issuing the LOR, the OG/CC requested a copy of the LOR purportedly given to the applicant while performing duties at Tyndall AFB since there was no record of the LOR in the applicant’s personnel file. The OG/CC never received a copy of said LOR and therefore documented the applicant’s misconduct with the LOR, dated 18 Sep 10. A complete copy of the AFRC/JA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05148

    Original file (BC 2013 05148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05148 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter with attachments prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is insufficient evidence of an error or an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03487

    Original file (BC 2014 03487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03487 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be credited with a satisfactory year of Reserve service for the retention/retirement (R/R) year 17 Jan 11 to 16 Jan 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03370

    Original file (BC-2002-03370.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Points for participation can only be credited for the dates the inactive duty was performed. Correction to the advisory is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and indicated that although the Reserve Order DA-01859 does assign him to the 514th AMW as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) he was in fact hired as a full-time Air Reserve Technician (ART). ...