Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01925
Original file (BC-2012-01925.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01925 
COUNSEL: NO 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was on terminal leave during the implementation phase of the 
Post-9/11 GI Bill program.  He was told by a Veteran’s Affairs 
(VA)  counselor  that  he  fell  into  the  category  along  with 
16,000 other  service  members  who  did  not  get  an  opportunity  to 
transfer their benefits while on active duty.   
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD  Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty.  
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 1 Sep 09, the applicant retired in the grade of senior master 
sergeant.  He served 28 years of total active service.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIT  recommends  denial.    DPSIT  states  the  member  did  not 
provide adequate justification/documentation.  On 23 Apr 09, the 
applicant  received  pre-separation  counseling  and  indicated  on 
his DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist for Active 
Component  (AC)  Service  Members  that  he  wanted  counseling  for 
educational benefits prior to his retirement.  On 12 Jun 09, the 
applicant  had  the  opportunity  to  ask  questions  about  the 
Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) when he out-processed.   
 
 
 

The  complete  DPSIT  evaluation,  with  attachments,  is  at  Exhibit 
B. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  19  Jun  12,  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days 
(Exhibit  C).    As  of  this  date,  this  office  has  not  received  a 
response. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed. 
 
3.  Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    We  note  the 
comments  of  the  Office  of  Primary  Responsibility  (OPR) 
concerning  the  steps  the  Air  Force  took  to  inform  eligible 
personnel of their ability to transfer Post 9/11 GI educational 
benefits  to  their  eligible  dependents.    We  also  note  the 
applicant  received  pre-separation  counseling  on  23  Apr  09  and 
indicated  that  he  wanted  counseling  for  educational  benefits 
prior to his 1 Sep 09 retirement.  However, we find no evidence 
that he ever received the requested counseling and note that he 
out-processed  on  12  Jun  09,  prior  to  both  the  requirement  for 
the  services  to  provide  and  document  individual  pre-separation 
counseling  on  this  important  benefit  and  the establishment  on 
27 Jun 09  of  the  Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  (DVA)  website 
for  electing  to  transfer  such  benefits  to  eligible  dependents.  
Moreover, as indicated by the OPR, the Air Force did not engage 
in a service-wide effort to seek-out members who were already on 
terminal leave or who had already completed their pre-separation 
counseling, in order to provide them with additional counseling 
on the Post 9/11 GI Bill.  Although he may have been aware that 
his 
for 
transferability, it appears that he was not provided sufficient 
information/instructions  for  completing  the  transfer  while  he 
was  still  on  active  duty.    In  view  of  the  above,  and  since  he 
was  eligible  to  elect  to  transfer  educational  benefits  because 
he  was  still  on  active  duty  on  1 Aug  09,  we  recommend  his 
records be corrected to the extent indicated below.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 

requirements 

eligibility 

dependent 

met 

the 

2 
 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating  to  APPLICANT  be  corrected  to  show  that  on  30 August 
2009,  he  elected  to  transfer  his  Post  9/11  GI  Bill  Educational 
Benefits.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  BC-2012-
01925 in Executive Session on 8 Jan 13, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Apr 12, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 22 May 12. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jun 12.  
 
 
 
 
                                  Panel Chair 

 
 
 

Panel Chair 
Member 
Member 

3 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03098

    Original file (BC-2012-03098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03098 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. There is no record of the applicant making a Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03843

    Original file (BC-2012-03843.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03843 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents while he was on active duty. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01178

    Original file (BC-2012-01178.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. On 17 Nov 08, the applicant received pre-separation counseling, and indicated on his DD Form 2648, Preseparation Counseling Checklist...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03688

    Original file (BC 2012 03688.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00542

    Original file (BC-2013-00542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00542 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to request Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02603

    Original file (BC-2012-02603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had he known about the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) he would have postponed his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. For the first time in history,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01737

    Original file (BC-2012-01737.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, Active Duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post- 9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations. The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703

    Original file (BC 2013 01703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01391

    Original file (BC-2012-01391.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement; however, the transferability portion of the benefit had not been established at that time and believes for that reason he should be given an opportunity to complete this transfer. The applicant states that he applied for the 9/11 GI Bill right before he retired (no date of when this happened), but the transferability requirement for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355

    Original file (BC-2012-02355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...