Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01737
Original file (BC-2012-01737.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01737 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 
 _________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He was not aware or briefed that the transfer of benefits had to 
take place while he was still on active duty. 
 
He  still  has  a  large  portion  of  his  entitlement  left  and  has 
finished  his  degree,  and  would  like  his  family  to  be  able  to 
further their education. 
 
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant retired in the grade of master sergeant effective 
1 Jun 10 after serving 22 years, 3 months, and 14 days of active 
duty service. 
 
Additional  relevant  facts  pertaining  to  this  application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in 
the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at 
Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIT  recommends  denial.    DPSIT  states,  the  applicant  was 
given adequate information and failed to follow through with the 
requirement to transfer benefits while on active duty.   
 
DPSIT  states  in  part,  service  members  enrolled  in  38  U.S.C., 
Chapter  33  (Post-9/11  Educational  Assistance),  are  able  to 
transfer  unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses 
or  children.    Any  member  of  the  Armed  Forces,  Active  Duty  or 
Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who 
is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI Bill, has at least 6 years of 

service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees 
to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from 
the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-
9/11  benefits  to  their  dependents  pursuant  to  Service 
regulations.  The transfer must be initiated while the member is 
serving in the Armed Forces, which is defined as limited to those 
on active duty or in the Selected Reserve. 
 
The Air Force issued AFI 36-2306, Voluntary Education Program, on 
23  Jul  09,  which  was  subsequently  replaced  with  AFI  36-2306, 
Attachment  9.    Paragraph  A9.4.3.15.4.,  requires  pre-separation 
counseling, documented on DD Form 2648, Pre-Separation Counseling 
Checklist.  However, the Air Force did not engage in a Service-
wide  effort  to  seek  out  members  who  were  already  on  terminal 
leave,  or  who  had  already  completed  their  pre-separation 
counseling, in order to provide them with additional counseling 
on the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 
 
On  24  Nov  09,  the  applicant  attended  a  pre-separation  briefing 
and  indicated  he  wanted  counseling  on  Education  Benefits 
concerning  the  GI  Bill.    He  was  also  scheduled  for  a  Veterans 
Affairs (VA) Benefits Briefing on 4 Dec 09.  The applicant had 
ample time from his pre-separation briefing and the time of his 
retirement on 31 May 10, to sign up for the benefit to transfer 
his benefits to his dependents.  A member’s failure to act in a 
timely manner is not a basis for approval on the part of the Air 
Force.   
 
If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the 
member  did  not  receive  adequate  pre-separation  counseling,  as 
required  by  law  and  DoD  regulation,  and  was  not  personally 
notified  about  the  need  to  transfer  while  serving  in  the  Armed 
Forces, then approval is in order. 
 
The complete DPSIT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 4 Jun 12, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a 
response has not been received (Exhibit C). 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 

 
 

2 

3.  Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.    While  the 
majority  of  the  Board  notes  the  steps  the  Air  Force  office  of 
primary  responsibility  indicates  were  taken  to  inform  eligible 
personnel of this new benefit, it appears that through no fault 
of  the  applicant  he  was  not  timely  made  aware  of  the  steps 
necessary  to  transfer  his  benefits  to  his  dependents.    In 
addition, the majority of the Board does not find it reasonable 
that he would have knowingly elected not to pursue use of this 
important  entitlement  for  his  dependents.    Therefore,  we 
recommend the records be corrected as indicated below. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 31 May 2010 
he  elected  to  transfer  his  Post  9/11  GI  Bill  Educational 
Benefits. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01737 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
By  a  majority  vote,  the  Board  recommended  approval  of  the 
application.  Mr. Russell voted to deny the applicant’s request 
and  elected  not  to  submit  a  minority  report.    The  following 
documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  Docket  Number  BC-2012-01737 
was considered: 
 
     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Apr 12. 
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 21 May 12. 
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Jun 12. 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04962

    Original file (BC-2012-04962.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant was approved for retirement on 19 May 09, nearly three full months prior to the start of the program on 1 Aug 09. The applicant has not provided any evidence that he was never briefed of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00542

    Original file (BC-2013-00542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00542 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to request Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04093

    Original file (BC-2012-04093.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After retiring and applying for one of his children to receive the benefit, he was told there was no record of his transaction. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05040

    Original file (BC-2012-05040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant retired from active duty prior to the Tranfer of Benefits becoming effective on 1 Aug 09 and, other than argument and conjecture, he has presented no evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03730

    Original file (BC-2011-03730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03730 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his children. DPSIT states the applicant retired on 30 Sep 10 and is not entitled to transfer his Post- 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03052

    Original file (BC-2012-03052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Based on the facts provided, the applicant did not transfer his benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement and he has not provided any evidence that his failure to do so was the result of his being improperly briefed prior to retirement. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03178

    Original file (BC 2013 03178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. In 2008, the Education Office did properly brief the applicant that Post-9/11 GI Bill can be used up to 15 years after separation/retirement; however, the Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01770

    Original file (BC-2012-01770.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She should have the same rights as those who received a retirement date on or after Aug 09, that were allowed to transfer their education benefits. The Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) program was implemented on 1 Aug 09 and required that you be on active duty at the time of transfer. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01770 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 12, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04210

    Original file (BC-2011-04210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04210 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. In support of his request, the applicant provides a Military Times article, titled “Some Army, Air Force retirees can still get GI Bill transfers.” The applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03923

    Original file (BC-2011-03923.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. However, if the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the applicant did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by...