Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02414
Original file (BC-2012-02414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02414 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The former member’s Length of Service retirement be changed to a 
disability retirement with a compensable disability rating of 
100 percent. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The decedent should have been medically retired versus receiving 
a length of service retirement because he was a Gulf War veteran 
originally rated 30 percent disabled with a service connected 
disability by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). He is 
now presumed rated 100 percent disabled due to conditions 
incurred or aggravated in the line of duty, as he died from 
complications of heart related conditions. 

 

The decedent experienced extreme fatigue, heartburn, high blood 
pressure, high cholesterol, shoulder, arm, joint pains, aching 
joints, Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), headaches, upper gastro-
intestinal (GI) issues and symptoms, muscle pain and weakness 
for years after the gulf war and continued for the rest of his 
life, and he died of heart related conditions. Based upon these 
conditions he would have been rated 100 percent disabled. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Based on the available records, on 30 Nov 01, the decedent was 
honorably relieved from active duty, with a reason for 
separation of sufficient service for retirement. He was 
credited with 20 years and 13 days of active service for 
retirement. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial, stating, in 
part, the military service history did not meet the criteria for 
reclassification to a medical discharge. 

 

The Medical Consultant opines this is a most regrettable account 
of one of our members. The decedent spent 20 years in the Air 
Force, voluntarily retired, and passed away approximately six 
years after retiring. His military records show an active 
career, but fail to support evidence that he was unfit to 
perform his military duties. There are no profile documents to 
support that he could not perform the duties commensurate with 
his office, grade, rank and rating. Moreover, the decedent’s 
discharge physical did not demonstrate the presence of a 
disqualifying medical condition that warranted conducting a 
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and referral to a Physical 
Evaluation Board (PEB) for consideration of a medical 
retirement. 

 

The governing Department of Defense (DoD) Directive under para, Presumption of Fitness-Application states," Except for service 
members previously determined unfit and continued in a permanent 
limited duty status, service members who are pending retirement 
at the time they are referred for physical disability evaluation 
enter Disability Evaluation System (DES) under a rebuttable 
presumption that they are physically fit. The DES compensates 
disabilities when they cause or contribute to career 
termination. Continued performance of duty until a service 
member is approved for length of service retirement creates a 
rebuttable presumption that a service member's medical 
conditions have not caused a career termination. 

 

The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at 
Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
4 Feb 13 for review and response. As of this date, no response 
has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt the rationale expressed 
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error or injustice. In addition, we note the 
Military Disability Evaluation System (MDES) only offers 
compensation for the medical condition that is the cause for 
career termination; and then only to the degree of impairment 
present at the time of final disposition or military separation. 
Conversely, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) operates 
under a separate set of laws which takes into account the fact 
that a person can acquire physical conditions during military 
service that, although not unfitting at the time of separation, 
may later progress in severity and alter the individual's 
lifestyle and future employability. While we sympathize with 
the applicant, regrettably, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02414 in Executive Session on 7 Mar 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 May 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, 

 dated 28 Jan 13. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Feb 13. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 


 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04255

    Original file (BC-2012-04255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His medical discharge with severance pay be changed to a medical retirement. Should the Board find that PTSD should have been found unfitting at the time of the 1998 medical board, they can provide the appropriate disability rating. The evidence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-1999-00390-2

    Original file (BC-1999-00390-2.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    BC-1999-00390, the applicant requested that his record be corrected to reflect that his compensable disability rating of 60 percent be changed to 75 percent on the basis of unemployability. He maintains that these findings should have been reflected in his Air Force medical evaluation for permanent and total disability and should have been separately rated at the PEB. The applicant’s complete responses, with attachments, are at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01948

    Original file (BC-2010-01948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Further, it must be noted the USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the member’s condition at the time of evaluation; in essence a snapshot of their condition at that time. The complete AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. However, based on a preponderance of the evidence the applicant’s disability rating of 70 percent was properly adjudicated and we find no evidence which would lead us to believe that his disability rating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03077

    Original file (BC-2007-03077.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although service connection has been established by the DVA and the applicant has reportedly been awarded a disability rating of 100 percent, there is no compelling evidence the applicant’s arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) prevented him from reasonably performing the duties of his office, grade, rank and rating during the period of his military service and at the time of his retirement. Nonetheless, acknowledgment of the radiographic evidence of the ASCVD prior to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05686

    Original file (BC 2013 05686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 Jun 09, an informal physical evaluation board (IPEB) determined the applicant’s coronary heart disease was unfitting for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent. The DVA Schedule for Rating disabilities indicates the applicant’s coronary artery disease rating fell at or below the criteria for a 10 percent disability rating; as he was also rated by the DVA. While the Board acknowledges the comment by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00557

    Original file (BC-2013-00557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not aware of the possibility of being medically retired because he had been through a “Fast-Track” Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe that at the time of his separation, a physical condition existed that was determined by competent medical authority to be a physical disability which specifically rendered him unfit for continued military service. _______________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01005

    Original file (BC-2007-01005.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that the applicant’s total combined permanent disability percentage should be increased from 40 to 60 percent to reflect the severe nature of his bilateral foot pain, which prevented him from reasonably performing his military duties. In the applicant’s case, the Air Force limited its unfit finding to his bilateral foot condition since that was the only condition limiting the performance of his military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00395

    Original file (BC 2014 00395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement order be corrected to reflect his disabilities were received in the line of duty as the direct result of armed conflict, caused by an instrumentality of war, incurred in the line of duty during a period of war, or were the direct result of a combat related injury. While we note the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01824

    Original file (BC-2008-01824.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    JA opines the possibility that the member’s attempt to add the sleep apnea to the MEB delayed the process; however, it is unclear how the LOD board’s subsequent finding of EPTS might have impacted the MEB process. Her complete response is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ BCMR MEDICAL CONSULTANT EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends medically retiring the deceased service member with a 30 percent disability rating, effective 24 Jan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04620

    Original file (BC 2013 04620.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Even if it is concluded the SGLI coverage is limited to the amount that was in effect on the date of his death, there is substantial evidence of an error or injustice as there was no counseling on SGLI by the Physical Evaluation Board Liaison Officer (PEBLO) during the pre- separation counseling process. In a letter dated 15 Jun 11, the Office of Service Members Group Life Insurance (OSGLI) advised the applicant that the coverage was based on the amount in effect at the time the decedent...