Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01721
Original file (BC-2012-01721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01721 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to RE code of 1 
(eligible). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He believes his RE code of 2C is unjust and that he should be 
given an RE code that would allow him to continue a career in 
the armed forces. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Based on the available records, the applicant enlisted in the 
Regular Air Force, on 4 Jan 11, for a period of six years. 

 

On 11 Jul 11, the discharge authority directed the applicant be 
discharged with an entry level separation. The specific reason 
was that the discharge authority found him unsuitable for 
further military service. 

 

On 15 Jul 11, the applicant received an uncharacterized entry 
level separation, by reason of “Entry Level Performance and 
Conduct,” and was issued an RE code of 2C. He was credited with 
6 months and 12 days of active duty service. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant’s 
RE code of 2C is based on the applicant receiving an entry level 
separation without service characterization. 

 

The RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the 
USAF, chapter 5, and the applicant did not provide any evidence 
of an error or injustice. The fact the applicant does not 


believe his RE code is just, does not make it unjust. 
Additionally, the RE code of 2C can be waived if recruiting 
service of any component of the military decides it’s 
appropriate in the applicant’s case. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 30 May 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt 
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-01721 in Executive Session on 29 November 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 


 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Apr 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 May 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 12. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02101

    Original file (BC-2012-02101.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02101 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization” be changed to a “1” to allow him to reenlist in the Armed Forces. On 10 Jun 11, the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02404

    Original file (BC 2012 02404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02404 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him entry into any branch of military service. On 7 Oct 10, his commander notified...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03860

    Original file (BC-2012-03860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03860 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 17 Apr 09, the applicant was notified of her commander’s intent to recommend that she be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen for Fradulent Enlistment. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02629

    Original file (BC 2014 02629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02629 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a “1” RE code series that would allow him to reenlist. However, HAF/A1P is postured to reevaluate those Airmen who were affected by entry level separation for failing academically between fiscal years...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00531

    Original file (BC-2012-00531.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00531 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to a 1C. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02863

    Original file (BC 2014 02863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02863 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to 3A (first-term airman involuntarily separated entry-level for inability to satisfactorily progress in a required training program without characterization of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04816

    Original file (BC-2011-04816.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04816 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) code of 2C, which denotes, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to something more suitable for re-enlistment in the Air National Guard...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01662

    Original file (BC-2011-01662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01032

    Original file (BC-2012-01032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to a Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 14 September 2010, it was discovered the applicant had a history of Asthma, and as a result, it was recommended that he be separated from the service for this condition. On 24 September 2010, the discharge authority approved the recommended discharge and directed the applicant be discharged with an entry level separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614

    Original file (BC-2011-03614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...