Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00337
Original file (BC-2012-00337.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00337 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
       
 
       
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
His  records  do  not  reflect  his  Vietnam  service.    He  served  in 
Vietnam  from  1967-1968  with  Det  1,  13th  AF.    He  was  recently 
awarded a disability for Vietnam service. 
 
In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  provides  a  notarized 
statement from a former service member. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The applicant’s records reflect that he contracted his enlistment 
in the Regular Air Force on 10 Aug 65.   
 
The  applicant’s  performance  report  for  the  period  15  Jul  67 
through  14  Jul  68  reflects  he  was  assigned  to  the  6200  Field 
Maintenance Squadron, Clark Air Base, Philippines. 
 
On  23  Jan  69,  the  applicant  was  honorably  released  from  active 
duty  and  was  credited  with  3  years,  5 months  and  14  days  of 
active  service,  which  included  1  year,  5 months,  and  1  day  of 
foreign service. 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ  AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial  noting  a  review  of  the 
applicant’s  master  personnel  records  and  the  documentation 
submitted failed to substantiate he had foreign service time in 
Vietnam.  However, DPAPP was able to verify and confirm that he 
had boots on ground at Clark AB, Philippines. 
 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 4 May 12, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    We  took 
notice  of  the  applicant's  complete  submission  in  judging  the 
merits  of  the  case;  however,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion  the 
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00337 in Executive Session on 6 Sep 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 

   Panel Chair 
   Member 
   Member 

 

2 

The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00337 was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Forms 149, dated 1 Jan 12, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 21 Mar 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 May 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                 
                               Panel Chair 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00337

    Original file (BC-2012-00337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00337 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. While assigned to Clark Air Base, he performed a TDY assignment to Taiwan; however, the exact amount of time served in Taiwan could not be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02254

    Original file (BC-2012-02254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While his Master Personnel Records did confirm foreign service at Clark Air Base, Philippines for a period of 1 year, 5 months, and 25 days, the total foreign service time as reflected on his DD Form 214 reflects 1 year, 7 months, and 25 days of foreign service; however, since it cannot be proven that he did not serve additional foreign service that cannot be found in the records, no corrective action should be taken. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04350

    Original file (BC 2013 04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04350 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03966

    Original file (BC-2011-03966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his foreign service to Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01966

    Original file (bc-2012-01966.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and the documentation submitted does not substantiate his claim that he served in Vietnam. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. In support of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to reflect his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he has provided the original temporary duty (TDY) orders assigning him from Clark Air Base, the Philippines, to Hue Phu Bai, RVN for two days in February 1968 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01429

    Original file (BC-2012-01429.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01429 in Executive Session on 30 Aug...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03687

    Original file (BC-2010-03687.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of boots on ground in Vietnam, stating, in part, that the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence that substantiates foreign service time in Vietnam. While it is not conclusive that the applicant served in the Republic of Vietnam, we find the submitted evidence to be credible and consistent with his statements and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00536

    Original file (BC 2013 00536.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He has documentation from a fellow service member who served in Vietnam with him who experienced a similar problem regarding his service in Vietnam, and how his records were corrected by the Air Force. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01385

    Original file (BC-2012-01385.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214 accurately reflects his Foreign Service Credit for his assignment to Clark Air Base but does not show...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00726

    Original file (BC-2012-00726.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although he has been unable to provide copies of travel vouchers in support of his request, it is our opinion that the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to persuade us that he served in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots on the ground in Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam, from 21 Mar 1972 through 20...