Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01966
Original file (bc-2012-01966.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

XXXXXX 

DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01966 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NOT INDICATED 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

His records be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service. 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

He  was  informed  by  the  Department  of  Veterans  Affairs  that  he 
never  served  in  Vietnam.    He  had  orders  to  show  he  was  assigned 
temporary  duty  (TDY)  in  Vietnam  effective  on  or  about  4  Feb 
68 for two days and on or about 12 Jun 68 for six days. 

In support of his request, the applicant submits his TDY orders. 

The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

On  18  Jul  66,  the  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force. 
On  17  Jul  70,  he  was  honorably  discharged.   His  DD  Form  214, 
Armed  Forces  of  the  United  States  Report  of  Transfer  or 
Discharge,  issued  in  conjunction  with  his  17  July  1970,  released 
from active duty,  reflects that  he completed 1 year and 6 months 
of foreign service.  He served four years on active duty. 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

AFPC/DPAPP  recommends  denial.  DPAPP  states  that  a  review  of  the 
applicant’s  Master  Personnel  Records  and  the  documentation 
submitted  does  not  substantiate  his  claim  that  he  served  in 
Vietnam.   However, DPAPP was able to verify he had “boots on the 
ground”  in  the  Republic  of  the  Philippines  from  4  Jan  67  and 
3 Jul 68. 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on  2  Jul  12,  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days.    As  of  this 
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

2.  The  application  was  not  timely  filed;  however  it  is  in  the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.    We took notice 
of  the  applicant’s  complete  submission  in  judging  the  merits  of 
the case; however, the Board majority agrees with the opinion and 
recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility 
and  adopts  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  their  conclusion  the 
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice. 
While  the  Board  majority  notes  that  the  applicant  has  provided 
TDY orders to Hue Phu Bai, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) for two days 
in Feb 68 and Cam Rhan Bay, RVN, for six days in Jun 68, they do 
not  find  this  evidence  sufficient  to  substantiate  his  claim  that 
he  actually  was  TDY  to  these  locations.   However,  should  the 
applicant  provide  evidence  to  substantiate  his  claim,  i.e., 
travel  vouchers,  we  would  be  willing  to  reconsider  his  request. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,  the Board 
majority  finds  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought 
in this application. 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that    the    application    will    only    be    reconsidered    upon    the 
submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered 
with this application. 

2 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive  Session  on  20  Feb  14,  under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36- 
2603: 

XXXXXX, Panel Chair 
XXXXXX, Member 
XXXXXX, Member 

By  majority  vote,  the  Board  voted  to  deny  the  application. 
  voted  to  correct  the  record.    The  following 

 

documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2012-01966: 

Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 25 Apr 12, w/atchs. 
Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 21 Jun 12. 
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. 

XXXXX 
Panel Chair 

3 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Office of the Assistant Secretary 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD 

FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) 

SUBJECT:  XXXXX, AFBCMR Docket No:  BC-2012-01966 

I have carefully considered all the facts and circumstances of this case and the evidence of 
record.  In view of the substantial evidence provided in support of this appeal, I do not agree with 
the recommendation of the majority of the AFBCMR panel to accept the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and deny the applicant’s 
request. 

In support of the applicant’s request that his records be corrected to reflect his service in 

the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he has provided the original temporary duty (TDY) orders 
assigning him from Clark Air Base, the Philippines, to Hue Phu Bai, RVN for two days in 
February 1968 and to Cam Rhan Bay, RVN, for six days in June 1968, for the purpose of 
maintenance support and recovery.  While the OPR opines this evidence fails to substantiate that 
he served in the RVN, I disagree.  Although completed travel vouchers for these TDYs would 
conclusively demonstrate that he completed them, I find these orders compelling.  Moreover, I 
agree with the minority voting member of the panel that it is unlikely that he would retain said 
TDY orders for over 44 years, if he, in fact, had never traveled to the RVN. 

Therefore, in view of the above, I find the applicant has met his burden of demonstrating 

the existence of an error or an injustice in his records and direct that his records be corrected to 
show that he had boots-on-the-ground in the RVN from 4 through 6 February 1968 and from 
12 through 18 June 1968. 

 

Director 
Air Force Review Boards Agency 

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01966

    Original file (BC 2012 01966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that a review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records and the documentation submitted does not substantiate his claim that he served in Vietnam. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 12. Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2012-01966 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board members.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01558

    Original file (BC 2014 01558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The VSM is awarded to all service members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73 in the area of eligibility (AOE). THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1999-01621

    Original file (BC-1999-01621.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-01621 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Dec 12, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04365

    Original file (BC-2010-04365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and the Philippines (Philippines service administratively corrected). However, the DD Forms 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher, was illegible and requested the applicant provide a legible...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04350

    Original file (BC 2013 04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04350 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00212

    Original file (BC-2012-00212.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 Mar 1961 and 28 Mar 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01561

    Original file (BC 2014 01561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01561 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating that after a thorough review of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03707

    Original file (BC-2012-03707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to his application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAA recommends denial, indicating that based on the evidence provided, a temporary duty (TDY) assignment to the RVN cannot be confirmed. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02295

    Original file (BC 2014 02295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02295 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following medals/ribbon: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...