Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03636
Original file (BC-2011-03636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03636 

  COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect he served in 
Vietnam. 

 

2. He be given award entitlements for service in Vietnam. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He served temporary duty (TDY) in Da Nang AB, Vietnam for 
183 days while he was stationed at Kadena AB, Okinawa. 

 

In support of his request the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force 
from 15 Apr 68 to 13 Jul 73. His DD Form 214 reflects a total 
of 8 years, 8 months, and 1 day of total active service, which 
includes 4 years, 6 months, and 12 days of Foreign Service. 

 

The Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), created on 8 Jul 65, is awarded 
to all service members of the Armed Forces who, between 4 Jul 
65 and 28 Mar 73, served in the following areas of Southeast 
Asia: in Vietnam and the contiguous waters and airspace; in 
Thailand, Laos or Cambodia or the airspace there over in the 
direct support of military operations in Vietnam. The specific 
eligibility criteria requires a member to be either: 

 

 Attached to or regularly serving for one, or more, days with 
an organization participating in or directly supporting ground 
(military) operations, 

 

 Attached to or regularly serving for one, or more, days aboard 
a naval vessel directly supporting military operations, 


 

 Actually participate as a crew member in one or more aerial 
flights directly supporting military operations, or 

 

 Serve on temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 
60 nonconsecutive days, which may be waived for personnel 
participating in actual combat operations. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
reflect foreign service in Vietnam. DPAPP states a review of 
the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation he 
submitted failed to provide any documents to substantiate 
foreign service time in Vietnam. However, they were able to 
confirm boots on the ground foreign service at Kadena AB, 
Okinawa, from 25 Sep 67 to 7 Nov 68, for 1 year, 1 month, and 
14 days. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
add the VSM to his records. DPSIDRA states that according to 
DPAPP’s memorandum dated 9 Nov 11, the applicant’s official 
military record and supporting documentation “failed to provide 
any documents that substantiate Foreign Service time in 
Vietnam.” DPSIDRA states they are unable to verify his 
entitlement to the VSM or any other awards for service in 
Vietnam as DPAPP is unable to verify the applicant served in 
Vietnam. 

 

The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 9 Dec 11, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To 
date, a response has not been received. Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and 
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2011-03636 in Executive Session on 26 Jan 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Sep 11, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP dated 9 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 21 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01393

    Original file (BC 2014 01393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no official documentation in the applicant’s records to verify he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of 6 months for award of the VCM. In additional, the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments verified the applicant as having served at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, but they were unable to confirm any foreign-service in Vietnam; therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VCM. To be eligible, a service member must be: permanently assigned,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04635

    Original file (BC-2011-04635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; or served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and contributed direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Armed Forces for an aggregate of six months. DPSIDR verified the applicant is entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with V device and one Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) and the Republic of Vietnam...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03152

    Original file (BC-2011-03152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03067

    Original file (BC-2011-03067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military service record be corrected to reflect the time he served in Vietnam. The DVA stated the evidence of record showed he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the Vietnam Era, therefore, exposure to herbicides is conceded. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request for service in Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00265

    Original file (BC-2011-00265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the VSM. As such, with the exception of the KDSM award that will be administratively added to his records, he is not entitled to any additional awards for his service in Vietnam; therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03251

    Original file (BC-2011-03251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his TDY to Vietnam. We note the applicant’s records have been administratively corrected to reflect his foreign service in Thailand. In this regard, we took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00951

    Original file (BC 2014 00951.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00951 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect military service in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he had boots-on-the-ground in the Republic of Vietnam. The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01201

    Original file (BC 2014 01201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no rationale as to why the Board should consider his untimely timely application in the interest of justice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof that he has been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04250

    Original file (BC-2011-04250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of his request to reflect service time in the Republic of Vietnam. DPAPP states they could not verify any time served in the Republic of Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he served 60...