RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04232
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her 11 Oct 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from the Air
Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was on a pregnancy profile and was not allotted the six
months of reconditioning time due to a profile error.
In support of her request, the applicant provides two copies of
AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification
Status.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
staff sergeant (E-5).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence
of an error or injustice. The applicant was asked to provide
documentation reflecting the date she delivered her child, along
with the reason for her new profile and new release date so her
contentions could be thoroughly evaluated; however, the applicant
did respond to the request.
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 13 Jan 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We
note the Air Force OPR requested additional documentation from
the applicant to help evaluate the merits of her claim; however,
she failed to respond. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04232 in Executive Session on 24 May 12, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04232 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Oct 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Master Military Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 Jan 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00411
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04745
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04745 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 24 Apr 10, she petitioned the AFBCMR (Docket Number BC-2010- 02102) to void her referral EPR for the period 18 Oct 07 through 28 Oct 08, contending she was not given sufficient time to adjust to the new workout plan given to her by her doctors. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02582
The LOR dated 14 Mar 12, be removed from her records. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicants requests to remove the FA dated 13 Dec 11 and 12 Mar 12. DPSIM notes the applicant provided documentation which states she was not medically fit for her FA due to snapping hip syndrome. DPSIM also recommends the applicants LORs dated 19 Dec 11 and 14 Mar 12 be removed from her records as both...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03347
Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum). In accordance with (IAW) guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905_ Fitness Program AFGM3 (3 Jan 12), Attachment 1, Section 10, If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander. The FSQ should be completed no...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01762
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05108
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends removal of her 23 Aug 11 FA, however, recommends denial of her request to void and remove her 25 May 11 FA because the member was tested correctly. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00808
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00808 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 25 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02813
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the cardio, sit-up, and push-up components of her FA dated 2 Apr 2012 reflect exempt in the AFFMS. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01757
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Air Force office of primary responsibility has reviewed this application and indicated there is an available avenue of administrative relief the applicant has not yet pursued. Exhibit D....