Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00808
Original file (bc-2013-00808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00808
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her 25 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).  

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her diagnosed anemia and iron deficiency precluded her from achieving a passing fitness score.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.  

_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).  

On 25 Oct 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA, attaining a composite score of 40.00, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment.  She performed the cardio portion of the FA (1.5 mile run) in 18.31 and received 0.00 points; however, she attained the maximum passing score for all remaining components.  

On 26 Oct 12, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run/1 mile walk component of the FA until 26 Jan 13.  The applicant was diagnosed with anemia and iron deficiency.  As a result, a family health provider concluded the applicant’s anemia caused her poor performance on the aerobic component of her contested FA.  

On 5 Dec 12, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining a composite score of 100.00, which constituted an excellent assessment.  She was exempt from performing the cardio component of the FA.  

On 3 Jul 13, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining a composite score of 93.70, which constituted an excellent assessment.  She performed the cardio portion of the FA (1.5 mile run) in 13.57.

The applicant’s last seven FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
03 Jul 13
93.70
Excellent
05 Dec 12
100.00
Excellent
*25 Oct 12
40.00 
Unsatisfactory
12 Apr 12
84.10
Satisfactory
20 Apr 11
93.70
Excellent
23 Apr 10
91.75
Excellent
07 Oct 09
90.50
Excellent

*The applicant’s contested FA.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, noting the applicant lacks supporting evidence.  While she provided documentation from her PCM stating she had a medical condition precluding her from achieving a passing fitness score on 25 Oct 12, there is no documentation from the unit commander invalidating the FA failure.  In accordance with AFI 36-2905, AFGM 4, paragraph 10, “If an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.”  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Oct 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________




THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting partial-relief.  The applicant contends her medical condition precluded her from attaining a passing score on the contested fitness assessment.  After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe a preponderance of the evidence indicates that corrective action is warranted.  In this respect, we note the applicant’s PCM provided a supporting statement indicating her medical condition caused her poor performance on the aerobic component of the contested FA.  Therefore, we believe AFFMS should be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the cardio component of the 25 Oct 12 FA.  While we note the applicant is requesting the FA score be declared void and removed from her records in its entirety, we believe correcting the records to reflect that she  was exempt from the cardio component of the FA, which will result in an overall score of 100.00, an “Excellent” rating, constitutes full and fitting relief in this case.  Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s record be corrected to the extent indicated below.  

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was exempt from the cardio component of her 25 October 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA), resulting in an overall composite score of 100.00, which constitutes an excellent rating.  

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00808 in Executive Session on 14 Jan 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member



All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00808 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Jan 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 19 Sep 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Oct 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair





	4	











Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682

    Original file (BC 2013 04682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of “no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279

    Original file (BC 2013 05279.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05042

    Original file (BC-2011-05042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends the AFBCMR approve the applicant’s request to void the contested report. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02626

    Original file (BC-2012-02626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval since per AFI 36-2905, Attachment 13, Sympathomimetic Bronchodilators such as Albuterol and Salmeterol may raise pulse when administered during the walk aerobic component of the FA. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04714

    Original file (BC 2013 04714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also provided a memorandum from the medical provider dated 01 Jul 13, that validated he had a medical condition that precluded him from passing the 19 Jun 13 FA and then was issued an AF Form 469. In regards to the FA dated 19 Jun 13, we recognize the letter from his medical provider, which states that a medical condition prevented him from passing. Furthermore, the applicant contends that since the FAs dated 31 July 12 and 28 Dec 12 now reflect a passing score in AFFMS and the FAs...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03908

    Original file (BC 2013 03908.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 29 Nov 12, the applicant participated in the contested FA and failed to attain the minimum score in the cardio component. On 14 Feb 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for relief on the basis that the applicant should not have completed the contested FAs once she became injured; additionally, the applicant did not provide a commander’s invalidation memorandum invalidating contested FAs. For Regular Air Force and AGR, they will enter the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468

    Original file (BC 2012 05468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03926

    Original file (BC-2012-03926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03926 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 10 Sep 09, 10 Dec 09, 31 Aug 10, 13 Oct 10, and 16 Feb 11, be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS); in the alternative, his records be corrected to reflect he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00307

    Original file (BC-2013-00307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Dec 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While the Board notes the recommendation from AFPC/DPSIM indicating that it was not until after his FA failure that he became restricted from...