Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03987
Original file (BC-2011-03987.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03987 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While on active duty, he received an email instructing him to go 
to the Veteran’s Administration (VA) website, to transfer his 
Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits, so he transferred 33 months to his 
wife and 1 month to each of his 3 dependent children. It was 
always his intention to transfer his Post-9/11 GI benefits. 

 

The applicant states he cannot locate any supporting documents 
and is missing two boxes of records from his move. All he has 
is his word, as a retired senior noncommissioned officer (SNCO) 
and an outstanding record for the past 25 years. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 1 Apr 11, the applicant retired in the grade of master 
sergeant after serving 25 years, 2 months and 14 days on active 
duty. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. The Air Force, in implementing 
its guidance, developed a communication plan that used the Air 
Force Personnel Center Commander and the Education and Training 
Sections at each installation to serve as spokespersons to 
communicate the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer-to-dependent program 
using internal media, internal communication tools, and external 
trade publications. There were various news articles about the 


Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on 
the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be 
eligible to transfer benefits. Some articles mentioned that 
service members on active duty or in the selected reserve could 
transfer benefits. Notably, since 1 Aug 09, the Air Force 
approved over 50,000 transferability applications. 

 

DPSI states the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the DoD 
and the Military Services widely publicized the Post-9/11 GI 
Bill and the transferability feature. DoD developed a special 
website, hosted by Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to 
facilitate the transfer of educational benefits. The website 
system was operational on 27 Jun 09 for the purpose of accepting 
transfer of benefits applications. The Directive Type Memo 
(DTM) and Air Force Instruction state the transfer must be made 
while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents 
were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, 
the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

 

On 4 Oct 11, the applicant contacted the AFPC Service Center; 
however, there is no record he ever applied 
previously/transferred to his dependents for the Post-9/11 GI 
Bill. 

 

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant reiterates his contention that he submitted his 
request to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits via the VA 
website; but now for some reason, its not part of his records. 
He called the AFPC service center to find out what was going on 
and was told the VA website was “messing up and not accepting 
most entries” and he was not the first person to call regarding 
this issue. 

 

He believes there is something wrong with the way the Post-9/11 
GI Bill benefits are/were transferred, since he is not the only 
person experiencing these problems. 

 

He knows he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; it would 
be a shame for his family not to receive these well—deserved and 
earned benefits. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 


 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2011-
03987 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 12, under the provisions of 
AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSIT, Letter, dated 31 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 23 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit E. Applicant’s Letter, dated 7 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03524

    Original file (BC-2011-03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had he known that only a one-year service commitment was required due to the date of his retirement, he would have certainly elected to transfer his benefits in a timely manner. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of services in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period of in the Armed Forces from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03714

    Original file (BC-2011-03714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were various news articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Oct 11 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04492

    Original file (BC-2012-04492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Both documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The complete AFPC/DPSIT...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03592

    Original file (BC-2011-03592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting there are no records showing the applicant requested a waiver or extension to remain on active duty to qualify for the program to transfer education benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03679

    Original file (BC-2011-03679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not adequately notified of the opportunity to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement on 30 Sep 10. There were various news articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. ________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03206

    Original file (BC-2011-03206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period of service in the Armed Forces from the date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to their dependents. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04551

    Original file (BC-2011-04551.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his spouse. The Secretary of the Air Force determined the Air Force would offer the transfer of benefits feature. ________________________________________________________________ The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04639

    Original file (BC-2011-04639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant received pre- separation counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01574

    Original file (BC-2012-01574.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The Air Force provided unfair and misleading information concerning Post 9-11 transferability by stating that enrolled members were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01366

    Original file (BC-2012-01366.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, the application is not supported with evidence that the applicant was a victim of an error or injustice. After a 2 thorough review of the evidence of record, we do not find persuasive evidence that his Post 911 GI Bill Transfer of educational benefits date is in error. While the applicant believes he was not properly briefed on the requirements to transfer...