RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03714
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her
dependents.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The rules of the Post-9/11 GI Bill were not known prior to the
implementation date of 1 Aug 09. She inquired numerous times
prior to her retirement thinking she would be able to transfer
the benefits to her children.
In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of
excerpts from the Air Force, Army, and Military Times, emails,
and a personal statement.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 1 Jun 09, the applicant retired in the grade of lieutenant
colonel.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. The Air Force, in implementing
its guidance, developed a communication plan that used the Air
Force Personnel Center Commander and the Education and Training
Sections at each installation to serve as spokespersons to
communicate the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer-to-dependent program
using internal media, internal communication tools, and external
trade publications. There were various news articles about the
Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on
the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be
eligible to transfer benefits. Some articles mentioned that
service members on active duty or in the selected reserve could
transfer benefits. Notably, since 1 Aug 09, the Air Force
approved over 50,000 transferability applications.
DPSI states the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the DoD
and the Military Services widely publicized the Post-9/11 GI
Bill and the transferability feature. DoD developed a special
website, hosted by Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to
facilitate the transfer of educational benefits. The website
system was operational on 27 Jun 09 for the purpose of accepting
transfer of benefits applications. The Directive Type Memo
(DTM) and Air Force Instruction state the transfer must be made
while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents
were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09,
the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.
The Air Force afforded the opportunity to extend for 30 days to
those airmen with a retirement date of 31 Jul 09. The applicant
missed the cut off by 60 days which renders her ineligible.
The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 28 Oct 11 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2011-
03714 in Executive Session on 18 May 12, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Sep 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. HQ AFPC/DPSIT, Letter, dated 13 Oct 11.
Exhibit C. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 28 Oct 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04281
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04281 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to her son. The applicant states she was TDY during this time, but this is not a true statement as noted in her Air Force Automated Education Management System (AFAEMS) records. Any member of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03524
Had he known that only a one-year service commitment was required due to the date of his retirement, he would have certainly elected to transfer his benefits in a timely manner. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of services in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period of in the Armed Forces from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03987
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While on active duty, he received an email instructing him to go to the Veterans Administration (VA) website, to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits, so he transferred 33 months to his wife and 1 month to each of his 3 dependent children. There were various news articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03679
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not adequately notified of the opportunity to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to his retirement on 30 Sep 10. There were various news articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement to be on duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. ________________________________________________________________ The following...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01574
Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The Air Force provided unfair and misleading information concerning Post 9-11 transferability by stating that enrolled members were...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03592
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting there are no records showing the applicant requested a waiver or extension to remain on active duty to qualify for the program to transfer education benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04492
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Both documents were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The complete AFPC/DPSIT...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04551
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04551 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his spouse. The Secretary of the Air Force determined the Air Force would offer the transfer of benefits feature. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04639
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant received pre- separation counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03206
Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period of service in the Armed Forces from the date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to their dependents. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were...