Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03524
Original file (BC-2011-03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03524 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was not properly counseled regarding the active duty service 
commitment (ADSC) requirement at the Post-9/11 briefing. Had he 
known that only a one-year service commitment was required due to 
the date of his retirement, he would have certainly elected to 
transfer his benefits in a timely manner. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of a 
supporting statement. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former Regular Air Force member who retired on 
1 Oct 11. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting they found no error or 
injustice to indicate the applicant did not receive adequate 
counseling. Although the guidance counselor asserts the 
applicantÂ’s early departure from the retirement briefing may have 
attributed to his confusion concerning the ADSC requirements, 
there is no evidence to indicate that he followed-up or attended 


any other briefings to get clarification regarding the ADSC 
requirements. 

 

Under Title 38 United States Code (USC), Chapter 33, service 
members are allowed to transfer unused educational benefits to 
their dependent spouses and children. Any member of the Armed 
Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, 
on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI bill, 
has at least six years of services in the Armed Forces on the 
date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional 
period of in the Armed Forces from the date of election, may 
transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. The Air 
Force, in implementing its guidance, developed a communication 
plan that used the Air Force Personnel Center Commander and the 
Education and Training Sections at each installation to serve as 
spokespersons to communicate the Post-9/11 GI Bill transfer-to-
dependent program using internal media, internal communication 
tools, and external trade publications. There were various news 
articles about the Post-9/11 GI Bill; most noted the requirement 
to be on duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI 
Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. Some articles 
mentioned that service members on active duty or in the selected 
reserve could transfer benefits. Notably, since 1 Aug 09, the 
Air Force approved over 30,000 transferability applications. 

 

DPSIT states the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the DoD 
and the Military Services widely publicized the Post-9/11 GI Bill 
and the transferability feature. DoD developed a special 
website, hosted by Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to 
facilitate the transfer of educational benefits. The website 
system was operational on 27 Jun 09 for the purpose of accepting 
transfer of benefits applications. The Directive Type Memo (DTM) 
and Air Force Instruction state the transfer must be made while 
the member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents were 
published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, the 
effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 28 Oct 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 


2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03524 in Executive Session on 15 May 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 27 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Oct 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01541

    Original file (BC-2013-01541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant did not provide adequate justification or documentation to substantiate approval of his request. Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, eligible for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00338

    Original file (BC-2012-00338.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00338 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to apply to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents with an effective date of January 2010 to avoid incurring an additional active duty service commitment (ADSC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01366

    Original file (BC-2012-01366.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, the application is not supported with evidence that the applicant was a victim of an error or injustice. After a 2 thorough review of the evidence of record, we do not find persuasive evidence that his Post 911 GI Bill Transfer of educational benefits date is in error. While the applicant believes he was not properly briefed on the requirements to transfer...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703

    Original file (BC 2013 01703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04639

    Original file (BC-2011-04639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant received pre- separation counseling for educational benefits prior to his retirement. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03592

    Original file (BC-2011-03592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting there are no records showing the applicant requested a waiver or extension to remain on active duty to qualify for the program to transfer education benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04097

    Original file (BC-2011-04097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, he was unaware of the requirement to be on active duty to elect to transfer his benefits until Sep 11 when he read about it in the Air Force Times. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicantÂ’s master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03206

    Original file (BC-2011-03206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period of service in the Armed Forces from the date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to their dependents. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary responsibility indicates were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03178

    Original file (BC 2013 03178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. In 2008, the Education Office did properly brief the applicant that Post-9/11 GI Bill can be used up to 15 years after separation/retirement; however, the Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03776

    Original file (BC-2011-03776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, that the applicant's last day on active duty was 31 Jul 09. The DTM and Air Force Instruction state the transfer must be made while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. While on terminal leave there were opportunities afforded members currently on terminal leave to extend their retirement effective date an additional 30 days in order to qualify for...