Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03655
Original file (BC-2011-03655.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03655 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 28 June 2011 be removed from 
his records. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He had difficulty breathing during his FA. He was later 
diagnosed with asthma and with having two minor and one severe 
bulging disk. He could not finish his FA due to back problems. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits medical 
documentation. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 17 November 2011, 
a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional 
documentation; specifically, the member’s AF Form 469, Duty 
Limiting Conditions Report, and AF Form 422, Physical Profile 
Serial Report. The applicant did not provide the requested 
documentation. 

 

The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 


 

On 13 January 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the 
existence of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03655 in Executive Session on 5 April 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03655 was considered: 


 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 September 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 January 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 January 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02827

    Original file (BC-2012-02827.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 December 2011 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04066

    Original file (BC-2012-04066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04066 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 16 February 2012 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 January 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084

    Original file (BC-2012-01084.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02389

    Original file (BC-2012-02389.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 1 October 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). However, the FA test dated 16 February 2011, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that the assessment was unjust. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00308

    Original file (BC-2012-00308.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 22 September 2010 8 March 2011 * 13 September 2011 28 September 2011 17 February 2012 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 24 April 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03854

    Original file (BC-2012-03854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03854 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 29 December 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03292

    Original file (BC-2012-03292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03292 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 30 May 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03148

    Original file (BC-2012-03148.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 November 2010 8 February 2011 13 October 2011 * 25 April 2012 24 July 2012 *Contested FA score. The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends he had been performing physical therapy and rehabilitation from a previous surgery during his FA on 25 Apr 12, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that his alleged medical condition precluded him from receiving a fair FA.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244

    Original file (BC-2012-04244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect “Exempt” for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01347

    Original file (BC-2012-01347.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should have been “exempt” from performing the sit-up portion of the FA test. ...