Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00308
Original file (BC-2012-00308.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-00308 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED: NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  Fitness  Assessment  (FA)  dated  13  September  2011  be  removed 
from his records. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He injured his abdomen during his FA.  He tested on 28 September 
2011 with a passing score of 86.  He was informed by the testing 
monitor  that  the  commander  approved  him  retaking  the  test  with 
the sit-up portion exempt. 
 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of email 
communiqué, notes from his primary care physician, and a letter 
from the applicant to his commander. 
 
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  is  currently  serving  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  in 
the grade of staff sergeant. 
 
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: 
   DATE 
 
  22 September 2010 
  8 March 2011 
* 13 September 2011 
  28 September 2011 
  17 February 2012 
 
*Contested FA score. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
 
 

SCORE 
SATISFACTORY 
SATISFACTORY 
UNSATISFACTORY 
SATISFACTORY 
SATISFACTORY 

 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states on 15 February 2012, 
a  memorandum  was  sent  to  the  applicant  requesting  additional 
documentation.  Specifically, the members AF Form 469 and AF Form 
422  indicating  limitations.    The  member  did  not  provide  the 
requested documentation. 
 
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On  24  April  2012,  a  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice.  We took 
notice  of  the  applicant's  complete  submission  in  judging  the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion  the 
applicant  has  failed  to  sustain  his  burden  of  proof  of  the 
existence of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2 

The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00308 in Executive Session on 9 August 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-00308 was considered: 
 
  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 3 October 2011, w/atchs. 
  Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 April 2012, w/atchs. 
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 April 2012. 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084

    Original file (BC-2012-01084.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02594

    Original file (BC-2012-02594.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the FA dated 26 April 2012 be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 26 July 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02594 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 June...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01347

    Original file (BC-2012-01347.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should have been “exempt” from performing the sit-up portion of the FA test. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01009

    Original file (BC-2013-01009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant received an AF Form 469 from his primary medical care provider stating he had a medical condition preventing him from passing the cardio component of the FA effective 18 Nov 2011. Therefore, the applicant should not have been required to complete the cardio portion of the FA. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244

    Original file (BC-2012-04244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect “Exempt” for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02389

    Original file (BC-2012-02389.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 1 October 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). However, the FA test dated 16 February 2011, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that the assessment was unjust. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00425

    Original file (BC-2012-00425.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00425 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment dated 30 Nov 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03598

    Original file (BC-2012-03598.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He failed the contested FA due to a medical condition that prevented him from achieving a passing score. The DPSID complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he would like to amend his request to have the EPR rendered for the period 1 February 2011...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05799

    Original file (BC-2012-05799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial; however, it is recommended that the cardio component of the FA be updated to reflect “exempt.” The applicant took his FA on 15 February 2012, scoring a composite score of 65, unsatisfactory. We took note of the recommendation of the office of primary responsibility to “exempt” the applicant from the cardio component of the contested FA and agree the record should be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04066

    Original file (BC-2012-04066.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04066 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 16 February 2012 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 January 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...