Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02279
Original file (BC-2011-02279.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02279 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. The fitness assessment scores he received on 12 Aug 10, 
29 Nov 10, and 3 Mar 11, be removed from the Air Force Fitness 
Management System (AFFMS). 

 

2. His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 
19 Mar 10 and 18 Mar 11, be corrected and upgraded to a non-
referral report. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He suffers from exercise induced asthma and this condition 
contributed to the failure of the cardio/running portion of his 
fitness tests. 

 

These failures resulted in him receiving a referral EPR and 
administrative demotion from staff sergeant to senior airman. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a 
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Form 10-5345, Request for 
and Authorization to Release Medical Records or Health 
Information, a letter from his physician, Chronological Record of 
Medical Care, his Air Force fitness assessment score sheet, and 
his Referral EPR. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 3 Aug 11, AFPC/DPSIDE informed the applicant that the AFBCMR 
will not consider a case until all avenues of administrative 
relief have been exhausted. For evaluation appeals, he must 
first submit his request through the Evaluation Report Appeals 
Board (ERAB). DPSIDE returned the application due to lack of 
supporting documentation from the rating chain to substitute the 
contested report. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 


Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts 
in this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ USAF/A1PP recommends removing all three failures from the 
AFFMS since undiagnosed exercise induced asthma was the apparent 
issue preventing the applicant from passing the cardio portion of 
the Fitness Assessment (FA). A1PP states since the applicant has 
been treated with an albuterol inhaler, he has passed the cardio 
portion of his FA on 1 Jun 11. 

 

The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

AFPC/DPSOE states, should the Board remove the three fitness 
failures from the applicant’s record, DPSOE recommends revoking 
the demotion orders and restoring the applicant’s rank to staff 
sergeant. Should the ERAB or AFBCMR remove/substitute the 
referral report as well, the applicant would be entitled to 
supplemental promotion consideration to technical sergeant 
beginning with cycle 11E6, once tested. 

 

The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant states at this time he does not have any additional 
evidence in support of his request, and would like for the 
investigation to move forward. 

 

The applicant's complete response is at Exhibit F. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After carefully 
reviewing the applicant’s submission, and the Air Force 
evaluations prepared in this case, we believe relief is 
warranted. In this respect, we note A1PP recommended the 
applicant’s three fitness assessment failures (12 Aug 10, 29 Nov 
10, and 3 Mar 11) be removed from the AFFMS. Based on this 
determination, we also believe that his referral EPR and 
administrative demotion should also be voided and removed from 
his records. We note he received a referral EPR for failure to 


meet Air Force fitness standards, and since it has been 
determined his fitness failures were the result of a medical 
issue that prevented him from passing the cardio portion of the 
fitness assessment, the appropriate resolution would be to remove 
the referral report from his records. In addition, we note he 
was demoted to the grade of senior airman effective 7 Apr 11, for 
failure to meet Air Force fitness standards. Based on the above, 
we believe it would be appropriate to revoke this action and 
restore his grade of staff sergeant. Therefore, in the interest 
of equity and justice, we recommend his records be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. The Fitness Assessment (FA) Failure scores, dated 12 Aug 
10, 29 Nov 10, and 3 Mar 11, be removed from the Air Force 
Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

 b. The Enlisted Performance Report, AF Form 910, rendered 
for the period 19 March 2010 through 18 March 2011, be declared 
void and removed from his records. 

 

 c. The applicant’s administrative demotion from staff 
sergeant to senior airman be declared void and he be restored to 
the grade of staff sergeant effective and with a date of rank of 
1 October 2008. 

 

It is further recommended that applicant be provided supplemental 
consideration with the corrected record for promotion to the 
grade of technical sergeant commencing with cycle 11E6. 

 

If AFPC discovers any adverse factors during or subsequent to 
supplemental consideration that are separate and apart, and 
unrelated to the issues involved in this application, that would 
have rendered the applicant ineligible for the promotion, such 
information will be documented and presented to the Board for a 
final determination on the individual's qualification for the 
promotion. 

 

If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection 
for promotion to the higher grade, immediately after such 
promotion the records shall be corrected to show that she was 
promoted to the higher grade effective and with a date of rank as 
established by the supplemental promotion and that she is 
entitled to all pay, allowances, and benefits of such grade as of 
that date. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02279 in Executive Session on 3 Nov 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, undated. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 18 Aug 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Sep 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02301

    Original file (BC 2013 02301.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 Apr 12, the contested commander-directed EPR, rendered for the period 29 Oct 11 through 17 Apr 12, was referred to the applicant for a “does not meet” standards rating in Block 2 (Standards, Conduct, Character, and Military Bearing) and for the following comment, “-Member was demoted due to third time failure of PT test.” The EPR was also referred for a “does not meet” standards rating in Block 3 (Fitness) and for the following comment, “Member failed to meet minimum physical fitness...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00264

    Original file (BC 2013 00264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00264 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. As a result of the failed FA’s, his projected promotion to the grade of SSgt was cancelled and he received a referral EPR. Although DPSOE initially recommended denial of the applicant’s request to be supplementally considered for promotion to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03538

    Original file (BC 2013 03538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 Feb 13, he was given a AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Qualification Status, which incorrectly authorized him to complete push-ups and sit-ups during FA testing, resulting in failure of his 28 Feb 13 FA because he only completed 10 push-ups. The applicant did not provide the Army version of the profile that was given to him, nor did he provide the original profile that should have been dated and signed by the Medical Provider on or about 15 Feb 13. While the Board notes the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02775

    Original file (BC 2013 02775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ On 7 Jan 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for removal of his failed FAs from the AFFMS stating that he should have tested within the limits of his profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the request for removal of the failed FAs dated 4 Apr 11 and 14 Nov 11 due to the lack of supporting...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04345

    Original file (BC 2013 04345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the demotion action and restore his rank to Technical Sergeant. Therefore, in view of the fact that we have determined the evidence is sufficient to conclude there was a causal nexus between the medical condition for which the applicant received a disability discharged and his ability to attain passing scores on his FAs, we also believe it is reasonable to conclude...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04871

    Original file (BC 2012 04871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He disagrees with the findings of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility. The letter from his Flight Surgeon and 844th Communications Squadron Executive Director states that he was diagnosed with a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score and that he should be exempt from the cardio component...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04035 (2)

    Original file (BC 2013 04035 (2).txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter dated 22 Oct 13, the demotion authority reinstated his grade to SSgt with his original Date of Rank (DOR) of 9 Jan 13. As such, if the applicant wants to make a request to remove the referral EPRs, he must first exhaust all available avenues of administrative relief provided by existing law or regulations, such as the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) prior to seeking relief before this Board, as required by the governing Air Force Instruction. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00302

    Original file (BC-2012-00302.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. AFPS/DPSID recommends approval of removing the referral EPR and substituting it with the proposed non-referred EPR should the Board approve the applicants request regarding his assessments. The applicant has provided a letter from the treating physician stating his underlying medical condition existed during the time of the failed assessments and lent itself to the applicant’s inability to pass the FAs. The complete DPSID...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00756

    Original file (BC 2013 00756.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The board should still consider whether the Control Roster which was issued not only for the contested FA failure, but also for two additional FA failures should be removed. HQ AFPC/DPSIDE administratively corrected the applicant’s EPR (by voiding the report) for the period 12 Aug 08 through 11 Apr 10, and replacing it with an AF Form 77 stating “not rated for the time period, report was removed by order of Chief of Staff of the Air Force.” Additionally, this action resulted in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01186

    Original file (BC 2013 01186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations and the BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on 19 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit G). Furthermore, in view of the fact the applicant was furnished two letters of reprimand (LOR) and a referral enlisted performance report (EPR) as a direct result of the contested FAs, the majority...