RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02104
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her 23 May 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be removed from her
records.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She practiced doing sit-ups in a certain form and was told she
was performing them correctly. However, when she went to take
the test the fitness monitor told her that she did not do the
sit-ups correctly and that most of them did not count. Because
she failed the sit-up portion of the FA, she was told she did not
have to perform the run. Thus, since she did not do the run, she
has no score.
She believes that when it comes to testing people, they should
stick to the same rules and not wait until the day of the test to
try to correct them.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her
Fitness Assessment Score Sheet.
Her complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of airman first class (E-3).
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these
facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAF/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states that due to lack of
conclusive evidence supporting the request or substantiated proof
that any violation in policy occurred, it is not recommended to
remove the applicants 23 May 11 FA score. Additionally, if an
airman fails a component at any time during an FA, the Fitness
Assessment Cells (FACs) have been instructed to encourage airman
to complete their FA and be assessed on all applicable/remaining
components; that promotes improving individual fitness levels and
provides a specific base line for that respected component for
their next FA.
The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 29 Jul 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, the Board majority agrees with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopts its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board
majority finds no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or
njustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2011-02104 in Executive Session on 16 Nov 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
By a majority vote, the members voted to deny the request. The
board voted to correct the record and did not desire to submit a
minority report. The following documentary evidence was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 May 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, dated 11 Jul 11, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02932
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02932 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessments, dated 8 September 2010 and 27 October 2010, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02810
The applicant failed the Muscular Fitness portion of the test therefore his overall FA rating was Unsatisfactory. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Accordingly there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01893
However, he has not received an Air Force Form 422, for the purpose of physical fitness testing, to date. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03392
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant has not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00822
The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Jul 13 85.40 Satisfactory 1 Feb 13 75.33 Satisfactory *19 Dec 12 32.50 Unsatisfactory 7 Jun 12 83.50 Satisfactory 29 Feb 12 38.10 Unsatisfactory * Contested FA In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02102
After a thorough review of the available records, the majority of the Board found no evidence that the applicants referral EPR is unjust or inaccurate. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36- 2502, table 1.1, Rule 22, receipt of a referral report renders a member ineligible for promotion; therefore, a majority of the Board recommends denying her request to reinstate her line number for promotion to technical sergeant. ...