RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03674
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The top three blocks on his AF IMT 2030, USAF Drug and Alcohol
Abuse Certificate, Section II, Certification at Time of
Application, be changed to read Yes.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During his entry into the Air Force, he openly admitted to
experimenting with marijuana. However, the top three blocks of
Section II of the AF IMT 2030 were incorrectly marked No. His
recruiter informed him he had all the correct information listed
on the document. That is why his signature is on the AF IMT
2030 stating it was truthful and correct. He only recently
discovered this error when pulling his original security
clearance paperwork to prepare his retention paperwork for his
Air Force Office of Special Investigation (AFOSI) Detachment.
His AFOSI Detachment, his First Sergeant, and his Squadron
Commander are all aware of the error.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant currently serves in the Regular Air Force (RegAF)
in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).
On 31 Jul 01, during his initial enlistment process, the
applicant also signed his SF 86, Questionnaire for National
Security Position, on which he had checked Item 24a denying
prior marijuana use.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility which is included at Exhibits C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence
of an error or injustice. The members AF Form 2030 on record
contains the members initials under the No column for all of
the top three blocks of Section II where the applicant had the
opportunity to disclose prior use of marijuana. The form was
completed on 27 Jun 01, and recertified by the applicant and an
Air Force Liaison at the Military Entrance Processing Station
(MEPS) on the day he entered active duty on 16 Oct 01. During
the enlistment process, the applicant had two more opportunities
to disclose previous use of marijuana: 1) while completing the
SF 86, Questionnaire for National Security Position, Item 24,
dated 30 Jul 01; and 2) during his physical exam at MEPS on
31 Jul 01 via the DD Form 2897-1, Report of Medical History,
pages 3 and 4.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 17 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03674 in Executive Session on 21 Mar 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Aug 12, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 4 Sep 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02064
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02064 INDEX CODE: 115.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) slot be reinstated. A complete copy of the AFROTC/CC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAO indicated they have no...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03877
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of a letter from his squadron commander to the wing staff judge advocate, dated 25 Jun 01, outlining why the applicant did not meet retention requirements. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00741
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00741 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be given credible service for time served and her narrative reason for separation, and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to join...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03501
The EPR does not reflect the correct Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC). The completed DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit G. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant, through counsel, submits a 7-page statement and a 1-page statement regarding the Air Force advisories. Counsel alleges the actions taken by the commander for the applicants DUI were appropriate; however, the additional actions against the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02582
On 6 and 8 Dec 00, legal reviews recommended that the applicant’s request for discharge in lieu of court-martial with a UOTHC characterization be approved. He had 18 years, 7 months and 23 days of active service. We therefore recommend that his records be corrected to reflect he continued on active duty until eligible for lengthy service retirement and that he was promoted to the grade of MSgt the day before his discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0025
ISSUE: Applicant was honorable discharged but wants his narrative reason for separation changed to erroneous enlistment so that he can go back into the military. (Change Discharge to Change Reason and Authority for Discharge) -. Respondent was fully informed of his rights to counsel and to present matters in his behalf for your review; (2) The reason cited as the basis for discharge in the commander’s notification letter is supported by a preponderance of the evidence and is an appropriate...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02200
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02200 INDEX CODE: 108.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Mr. Douglas H. Kohrt XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records, specifically her DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment from Officer Candidate-Type Training, Section IV, be changed from “Definitely Not Recommended” to “Highly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service/Drug Abuse be removed. On 22 Nov 10, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00520
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies his medical records, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; DD Form 2808, Report of Medical Examination; and PRP Questionnaire. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant disclosed on the Personnel Reliability Program (PRP) Questionnaire that he deliberately cut himself in the summer...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03858
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial stating there appears to be no error or injustice regarding the applicants HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...