RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03674 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The top three blocks on his AF IMT 2030, USAF Drug and Alcohol Abuse Certificate, Section II, Certification at Time of Application, be changed to read “Yes.” ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: During his entry into the Air Force, he openly admitted to experimenting with marijuana. However, the top three blocks of Section II of the AF IMT 2030 were incorrectly marked “No.” His recruiter informed him he had all the correct information listed on the document. That is why his signature is on the AF IMT 2030 stating it was truthful and correct. He only recently discovered this error when pulling his original security clearance paperwork to prepare his retention paperwork for his Air Force Office of Special Investigation (AFOSI) Detachment. His AFOSI Detachment, his First Sergeant, and his Squadron Commander are all aware of the error. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant currently serves in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). On 31 Jul 01, during his initial enlistment process, the applicant also signed his SF 86, Questionnaire for National Security Position, on which he had checked Item 24a denying prior marijuana use. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The member’s AF Form 2030 on record contains the member’s initials under the “No” column for all of the top three blocks of Section II where the applicant had the opportunity to disclose prior use of marijuana. The form was completed on 27 Jun 01, and recertified by the applicant and an Air Force Liaison at the Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS) on the day he entered active duty on 16 Oct 01. During the enlistment process, the applicant had two more opportunities to disclose previous use of marijuana: 1) while completing the SF 86, Questionnaire for National Security Position, Item 24, dated 30 Jul 01; and 2) during his physical exam at MEPS on 31 Jul 01 via the DD Form 2897-1, Report of Medical History, pages 3 and 4. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-03674 in Executive Session on 21 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Aug 12, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 4 Sep 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12. Panel Chair