Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03772
Original file (BC-2011-03772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03772 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
son. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He would like to transfer his 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
family members. He became aware, after retiring from the Air 
Force, that he needed to transfer his educational benefits prior 
to retirement. 

 

Before he retired, he transferred his Montgomery GI Bill to the 
new 9/11 GI Bill. He went to the website that allows you to 
transfer the benefits and saw his family member’s names, so he 
thought he did everything correctly. 

 

After he retired, he went to the website and all the names were 
gone. He was not told while outprocessing the transfer had to 
be done prior to retiring. After making some inquiries in June 
2010, he was told he was too late. He believes the new process 
led to his error in the benefits transfer. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
Certificate of Eligibility, a copy of his Transfer of Benefits 
(TEB) print-out, and a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of 
Release or Discharge from Active Duty. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant retired on 1 March 2010 as a master sergeant/E7. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force which is at Exhibit B. 

________________________________________________________________ 


 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. The applicant enrolled and was 
approved for 100 percent of the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI 
Bill, but failed to transfer his benefits to his dependents 
prior to his retirement. 

 

The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), Department of Defense 
(DoD) and the Military Services widely publicized the Post-9/11 
GI Bill and the transferability feature of a specially developed 
website to facilitate the transfer of educational benefits. The 
system was available on 27 June 2009 for the purpose of 
transferring benefits. The Directive Type Memo and the Air 
Force Instruction required the transfer application to be made 
using the TEB website. The applican’st Certificate of 
Eligibility from the VA is dated 22 June 2009. He had 
sufficient time to ensure his benefits were properly transferred 
to his dependents before his retirement. 

 

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 November 2011, for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case, however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

___________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03772 in Executive Session on 3 April 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

  Panel Chair 

  Member 

  Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Sep 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 27 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Nov 11. 

  

 
Panel Chair 
 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03772

    Original file (BC 2013 03772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01350

    Original file (BC-2012-01350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After retiring from the Air Force he became aware that he was required to transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. He was not briefed that he had to transfer benefits before retiring. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01350 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02949

    Original file (BC 2013 02949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While on active duty he was instructed by the Education Office that the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) had to be accomplished while he was on active duty. However, the Board may approve the applicant’s request if they find there was an injustice to the extent the applicant did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling as required by law and DoD regulation and that he was not personally...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04461

    Original file (BC-2011-04461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes his record is in error and unjust because he signed for the GI Bill transfer benefit based on erroneous information that he was provided at the time. Although the applicant states that he was provided erroneous, inaccurate, and misleading information regarding rescinding GI Bill benefits on the Transferability of Educational Benefits (TEB), DPSIT states that this is not a true statement. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00168

    Original file (BC 2014 00168.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends granting the applicant’s request noting the applicant may not have received accurate information regarding transferring education benefits to his dependents. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 Aug 09, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05053

    Original file (BC-2011-05053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post 9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post 9/11 benefits to their dependents On 18 Feb 11, the applicant acknowledged and electronically signed the Post...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01703

    Original file (BC 2013 01703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would have transferred his MGIB benefits to the Post-9/11 Bill if he would have known that MGIB transferability to dependents went away and/or that his ADSC would have been waived if he transferred to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. He was not provided the proper information pertaining to the GI Bill benefits or transferring his education benefits to the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While the applicant contends he was unaware that he could not transfer the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) (Chapter 30) to his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01922

    Original file (BC-2012-01922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The option to elect TEB for his dependents was available on the DVA website when he switched from the Montgomery GI Bill to the Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00454

    Original file (BC-2010-00454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised during his retirement out-processing that all he needed to do was complete the required forms to transfer his GI benefits to his dependents before he retired. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 August 2009 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air Force personnel. The complete HQ...