Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03800
Original file (BC-2011-03800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
ECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03800 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be entitled to the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He should have been awarded the MSM upon his return from his 
deployment in Oman in support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH in 
1998. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a Defense.gov 
News photo taken of him displayed while assigned in Southwest 
Asia. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant served on active duty in the Regular Air Force 
from 13 Oct 92 to 28 Aug 00. 

 

The MSM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the 
United States who distinguished themselves by either outstanding 
achievement or meritorious service to the United States. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states that based upon 
review of the applicant’s military records and the documentation 
provided they were unable verify his entitlement to the MSM. No 
official documentation was provided nor located that verifies 
the applicant had been recommended for, or awarded the MSM. 

 

According to AFI 36-2803, Chapter 2, 2.2.6, no individual is 
automatically entitled to an award upon completion of an 
operational temporary duty (TDY) or departure for an assignment. 

 


All Air Force decorations require a signed written 
recommendation be submitted into official channels and processed 
through the approval authority. The recommendation must be 
submitted within two years, and the decoration presented within 
three years of the act, accomplishment or service performed. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 9 Dec 2011, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To 
date, a response has not been received. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2011-03800 in Executive Session on 18 Jan 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 


 , Member 

 , Member 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 1 Sep 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 22 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03909

    Original file (BC-2011-03909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. However, after reviewing the documentation submitted, we believe, the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support award of the MSM. ________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03583

    Original file (BC-2011-03583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03583 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), first oak leaf cluster, be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01401

    Original file (BC-2011-01401.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He receive a copy of the order and the narrative for the MSM. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of his DD Form 214, and various other documents associated with his request. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2011-01401 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02448

    Original file (BC-2009-02448.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records met a highly competitive board without the MSM and may have caused his non-selection. We note the applicant’s belief that the absence of the MSM from his records may have caused his nonselection to promotion of major; however, we are not persuaded that the evidence presented substantiates his claim. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Dec 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03887

    Original file (BC-2010-03887.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Mistakes were made while processing his BSM recommendation that no one was willing to correct, which resulted in him being awarded the MSM instead of the BSM. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, other than his own assertions, he has provided no evidence the action to downgrade his recommendation for a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) to a Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) first oak leaf cluster (1 OLC) was the result of an error on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04235

    Original file (BC-2011-04235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s entitlement to the Meritorious...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02078

    Original file (BC-2011-02078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) as a retirement decoration for his 20 years of honorable service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01735

    Original file (BC-2011-01735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00770

    Original file (BC-2011-00770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00770 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Meritorious Service Medal with one Oak Leaf Cluster (MSM w/1OLC). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02227

    Original file (BC-2010-02227.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he searched his records but could not find the special order awarding the MSM. He asked his commander at the time of retirement for a copy of the order; however, he could not find the order. In this respect, we believe the copy of the award citation and recommendation package provided...