Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03909
Original file (BC-2011-03909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03909 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be entitled to the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was assigned to the 416 Combat Support Group at Griffis AFB 
NY from 2 July 78 to 31 Aug 81 and received a MSM upon his 
retirement. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a MSM citation 
and certificate for the period of 2 Jul thru 31 Aug 81. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 24 Feb 61, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force. On 
31 Aug 81, he was retired in the grade of master sergeant. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states that based upon 
a review of the applicant’s military records and the 
documentation provided they were unable to verify his 
entitlement to the MSM. Although there is evidence, there is no 
special order awarding the MSM. 

 

According to AFI 36-2803, Air Force Awards and Decorations 
Program, Chapter 2, 2.2.6, no individual is automatically 
entitled to an award upon completion of an operational temporary 
duty (TDY) or departure for an assignment. 

 

All Air Force decorations require a signed written 
recommendation be submitted into official channels and processed 
through the approval authority. The recommendation must be 
submitted within two years, and the decoration presented within 
three years of the act, accomplishment or service performed. 


 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 9 Dec 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As 
of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
relief. We note the office of primary responsibility (OPR) 
states the applicant did not provide a special order to support 
award of the MSM. However, after reviewing the documentation 
submitted, we believe, the applicant has provided sufficient 
evidence to support award of the MSM. In this respect, we note 
the applicant submitted a copy of the MSM certificate and 
citation which coincides with his retirement from the Air Force. 
In view of the above, we recommend his records be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was 
awarded the Meritorious Service Medal, for outstanding service 
for the period of 2 Jul 78 to 31 Aug 81. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2011-03909 in Executive Session on 18 Jan 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 


 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The Board voted to correct the record as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-
2011-03909 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 21 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03583

    Original file (BC-2011-03583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03583 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Meritorious Service Medal (MSM), first oak leaf cluster, be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05810

    Original file (BC 2013 05810.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05810 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following: 1. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Dec 13, w/atchs.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02078

    Original file (BC-2011-02078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) as a retirement decoration for his 20 years of honorable service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02448

    Original file (BC-2009-02448.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records met a highly competitive board without the MSM and may have caused his non-selection. We note the applicant’s belief that the absence of the MSM from his records may have caused his nonselection to promotion of major; however, we are not persuaded that the evidence presented substantiates his claim. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Dec 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-02137

    Original file (BC-2007-02137.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibits B and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR notes that while serving as a first sergeant and attached to the Army, the applicant was deployed to Balad Air Base (AB), Iraq from 5 Dec 04 to 5 Apr 05. They recommend the Board review the nominating official’s original...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01934

    Original file (BC-2012-01934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 Oct 06, the applicant received an MSM (2OLC) for retirement for the period 18 Nov 05 through 30 Nov 06. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to reinstate the MSM for retirement indicating there is no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00634

    Original file (BC-2010-00634.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00634 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03800

    Original file (BC-2011-03800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the MSM upon his return from his deployment in Oman in support of Operation SOUTHERN WATCH in 1998. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01735

    Original file (BC-2011-01735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01949

    Original file (BC-2012-01949.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01949 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM). Therefore, in the interest of justice, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to reflect award of...