Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04609
Original file (BC-2012-04609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04609 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. Her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 
3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) scores be 
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management 
System (AFFMS). 

 

2. Her Referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for 
the period 17 November 2009 through 16 November 2010, be 
declared void and removed from her records. 

 

3. Her records be corrected to reflect she was promoted to the 
grade of master sergeant (E-7), effective 1 December 2010, 
instead of 1 August 12. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

1. Her FA failures were the result of documented multiple 
medical conditions. 

 

2. Her Referral EPR was rendered as a result of her FA 
failures, causing her to be ineligible for promotion and her 
line number to be removed. 

 

3. Her promotion to master sergeant (E-7) during promotion 
cycle 10E7 should be reconsidered because a medical provider 
determined that her medical conditions were a contributing 
factor to her 16 November 2010 FA failure. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant’s military records indicate that she served in the 
Regular Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) prior 
to the events under review. 

 


The following is a resume of the applicant’s last six FA 
results: 

 

Date 

Composite Score 

Rating 

16 November 2010 

51.75 

Unsatisfactory 

14 February 2011 

64.25 

Unsatisfactory 

03 May 2011 

79.50 

Satisfactory 

05 January 2012 

00.00 

Unsatisfactory 

03 April 2012 

27.00 

Unsatisfactory 

02 July 2012 

27.00 

Unsatisfactory 



 

On 23 July 2010, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, 
was initiated that restricted the applicant’s duty and mobility. 
The applicant was restricted from running greater than one half 
mile, walking greater than two miles, pushing greater than 40 
pounds, repetitive bending of the waist, and strenuous activity, 
until 4 November 2010. 

 

On 27 July 2010, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, which 
exempted her from all components of the FA, except for the 
abdominal circumference (AC) component, until 4 November 2010. 

 

On 18 October 2010, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, 
which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run and 1.0 mile walk, 
until 2 November 2010. 

 

On 10 November 2010, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, 
which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run and 1.0 mile walk, 
until 30 November 2010. 

 

On 30 November 2010, the contested EPR was rendered upon the 
applicant, which contained comments that made the report a 
referral; specifically, a comment in section 3 pertaining to her 
poor fitness score. 

 

The applicant was tentatively selected for promotion to the 
grade of master sergeant (E-7) during cycle 10E7. She received 
promotion sequence number (PSN) 1682.0, which would have 
incremented on 1 December 2010. However, her promotion was 
deferred in accordance with AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion 
Program, when she received the aforementioned referral EPR. 

 

On 7 February 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, 
which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run and 1.0 mile walk, 
until 18 February 2011. 

 

On 18 April 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that restricted 
the applicant’s duty and mobility. The applicant was restricted 
from running, no max effort bending at the waist, jumping, 
squatting, pushing, or pulling with upper body greater than 
40 pounds, until 15 May 2011. 

 


On 11 September 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that 
restricted the applicant’s duty. The applicant was restricted 
from running greater than 100 yards, jumping, squatting, 
pushing/pulling, lifting greater than 40 pounds, or repetitive 
bending at the waist, until 22 September 2011. 

 

On 1 November 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that 
restricted the applicant’s duty. The applicant was restricted 
from running greater than 100 yards, walking greater than one 
quarter mile, marching, squatting, high impact activity, 
pushing/pulling or lifting greater than 40 pounds, until 
30 November 2011. 

 

On 19 December 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that 
restricted the applicant’s duty. The applicant was restricted 
from running greater than 100 yards, repetitive bending at the 
waist, marching, squatting, high impact activity, and 
pushing/pulling or lifting greater than 40 pounds, until 
14 February 2012. 

 

On 21 December 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, 
which exempted her from all components of the FA, except for her 
abdominal circumference (AC) assessment, until 14 February 2012. 

 

On 2 March 2012, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which 
exempted her from all components of the FA, except for her 
abdominal circumference (AC) assessment, until 20 April 2012. 

 

On 10 April 2012, an AF Form 469, was initiated that restricted 
the applicant’s duty and mobility. The applicant was restricted 
from running greater than 100 yards, lifting/pulling or pushing 
greater than 40 pounds, high impact activity, and repetitive 
bending at the waist, until 20 February 2013. 

 

On 1 June 2012, an AF Form 469, was initiated that restricted 
the applicant’s duty and mobility. The applicant was restricted 
from running greater than 100 yards, lifting/pulling or pushing 
greater than 40 pounds, high impact activity, and repetitive 
bending a the waist, until 20 February 2013. 

 

On 6 June 2012, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which 
exempted her from all components of the FA, except for her 
abdominal circumference (AC) assessment, until 20 February 2013. 

 

On 10 June 2012, the applicant’s medical provider indicated on 
an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention 
Processing, that she is and has been on multiple medications to 
cause unwanted weight gain. 

 

On 11 July 2012, the applicant’s medical provider indicated on 
an AF Form 108, that she has multiple reasons that she would not 
be able to pass a physical training test. 

 


On 1 August 2012, the applicant was promoted to the grade of 
master sergeant (E-7). 

 

On 21 August 2012, the applicant’s medical provider indicated 
that she had a documented medical condition that precluded her 
from achieving a passing score in the non-exempt portions of her 
14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 02 July 2012 
FA tests. 

 

On an undated letter, the applicant’s medical provider indicated 
that she had a documented medical condition that precluded her 
from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of her 
16 November 2010 FA tests. 

 

On 28 March 2013, the applicant was relieved from active duty 
and permanently retired for physical disability, effective 
29 March 2013, with a combined compensable disability rating of 
40 percent. The applicant was credited with 18 years, 7 months, 
and 12 days total active service for retirement. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicant’s request to 
have her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 
3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessments removed from 
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS) because she had 
documented medical conditions that precluded her from achieving 
passing scores in non-exempt portions of the contested FAs. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 February 2013 for review and comment within 30 
days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect 


to the applicant’s requests related to her fitness assessments 
(FA). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in 
judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant’s contested FAs should be declared void and removed 
due to her medical conditions. As for the applicant’s request 
to remove her referral enlisted performance report (EPR) and 
restore the original effective date of her promotion to the 
grade of master sergeant, in view of the fact that we have 
determined the contested FA scores should be removed, and the 
applicant’s FA failure formed the sole basis of the referral EPR 
and promotion deferral, we believe it would be appropriate to 
recommend approval of the applicant’s remaining requests. 
Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as 
indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. Her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 
3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessments (FA) be 
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management 
System (AFFMS). 

 

 b. The AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru 
TSgt), rendered for the period 17 November 2009 through 
16 November 2010, be declared void and removed from her records. 

 

 c. She was promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7), 
effective and with a date of rank of 1 December 2010, instead of 
1 August 2012. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04609 in Executive Session on 9 July 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04609 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 October 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 30 January 2013. 


 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 February 2013. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04719

    Original file (BC-2012-04719.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of the FA, he suffered from multiple serious medical conditions which warranted exemption from the full FA; however, he was required to take the AC portion. On 22 Nov 10, the applicant’s Wing Medical Group issued a memorandum, Clarification of AC Exemption Recommendation for FA, establishing the Exercise Physiologist working with the Senior Profile Officer as the only authorities who could recommend to commanders medical exemptions from components of an FA for a member with Duty...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04690

    Original file (BC-2012-04690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 March 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 May 2011. On 17 May 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 June 2011. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00324

    Original file (BC 2013 00324.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On or about 18 March 2011, the applicant requested a two-week extension of the close-out date of the contested report to include a successful fitness assessment. On 24 November 2013, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board voided the Fitness Assessments, dated 26 August 2004, 21 July 2005, 21 February 2006, 4 April 2008 and 14 October 2009, and they have been removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System. Moreover, we also recognize that she would have been able to successfully...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097

    Original file (BC-2012-01097.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794

    Original file (BC 2012 05794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794

    Original file (BC 2012 05794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02775

    Original file (BC 2013 02775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ On 7 Jan 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicant’s request for removal of his failed FAs from the AFFMS stating that he should have tested within the limits of his profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the request for removal of the failed FAs dated 4 Apr 11 and 14 Nov 11 due to the lack of supporting...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468

    Original file (BC 2012 05468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644

    Original file (BC 2013 01644 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., “exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier.” On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664

    Original file (BC 2013 01664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., “exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier.” On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...