RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04609
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. Her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012,
3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) scores be
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management
System (AFFMS).
2. Her Referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for
the period 17 November 2009 through 16 November 2010, be
declared void and removed from her records.
3. Her records be corrected to reflect she was promoted to the
grade of master sergeant (E-7), effective 1 December 2010,
instead of 1 August 12.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
1. Her FA failures were the result of documented multiple
medical conditions.
2. Her Referral EPR was rendered as a result of her FA
failures, causing her to be ineligible for promotion and her
line number to be removed.
3. Her promotion to master sergeant (E-7) during promotion
cycle 10E7 should be reconsidered because a medical provider
determined that her medical conditions were a contributing
factor to her 16 November 2010 FA failure.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military records indicate that she served in the
Regular Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) prior
to the events under review.
The following is a resume of the applicants last six FA
results:
Date
Composite Score
Rating
16 November 2010
51.75
Unsatisfactory
14 February 2011
64.25
Unsatisfactory
03 May 2011
79.50
Satisfactory
05 January 2012
00.00
Unsatisfactory
03 April 2012
27.00
Unsatisfactory
02 July 2012
27.00
Unsatisfactory
On 23 July 2010, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report,
was initiated that restricted the applicants duty and mobility.
The applicant was restricted from running greater than one half
mile, walking greater than two miles, pushing greater than 40
pounds, repetitive bending of the waist, and strenuous activity,
until 4 November 2010.
On 27 July 2010, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status, which
exempted her from all components of the FA, except for the
abdominal circumference (AC) component, until 4 November 2010.
On 18 October 2010, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422,
which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run and 1.0 mile walk,
until 2 November 2010.
On 10 November 2010, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422,
which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run and 1.0 mile walk,
until 30 November 2010.
On 30 November 2010, the contested EPR was rendered upon the
applicant, which contained comments that made the report a
referral; specifically, a comment in section 3 pertaining to her
poor fitness score.
The applicant was tentatively selected for promotion to the
grade of master sergeant (E-7) during cycle 10E7. She received
promotion sequence number (PSN) 1682.0, which would have
incremented on 1 December 2010. However, her promotion was
deferred in accordance with AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion
Program, when she received the aforementioned referral EPR.
On 7 February 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422,
which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run and 1.0 mile walk,
until 18 February 2011.
On 18 April 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that restricted
the applicants duty and mobility. The applicant was restricted
from running, no max effort bending at the waist, jumping,
squatting, pushing, or pulling with upper body greater than
40 pounds, until 15 May 2011.
On 11 September 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that
restricted the applicants duty. The applicant was restricted
from running greater than 100 yards, jumping, squatting,
pushing/pulling, lifting greater than 40 pounds, or repetitive
bending at the waist, until 22 September 2011.
On 1 November 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that
restricted the applicants duty. The applicant was restricted
from running greater than 100 yards, walking greater than one
quarter mile, marching, squatting, high impact activity,
pushing/pulling or lifting greater than 40 pounds, until
30 November 2011.
On 19 December 2011, an AF Form 469, was initiated that
restricted the applicants duty. The applicant was restricted
from running greater than 100 yards, repetitive bending at the
waist, marching, squatting, high impact activity, and
pushing/pulling or lifting greater than 40 pounds, until
14 February 2012.
On 21 December 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422,
which exempted her from all components of the FA, except for her
abdominal circumference (AC) assessment, until 14 February 2012.
On 2 March 2012, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which
exempted her from all components of the FA, except for her
abdominal circumference (AC) assessment, until 20 April 2012.
On 10 April 2012, an AF Form 469, was initiated that restricted
the applicants duty and mobility. The applicant was restricted
from running greater than 100 yards, lifting/pulling or pushing
greater than 40 pounds, high impact activity, and repetitive
bending at the waist, until 20 February 2013.
On 1 June 2012, an AF Form 469, was initiated that restricted
the applicants duty and mobility. The applicant was restricted
from running greater than 100 yards, lifting/pulling or pushing
greater than 40 pounds, high impact activity, and repetitive
bending a the waist, until 20 February 2013.
On 6 June 2012, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which
exempted her from all components of the FA, except for her
abdominal circumference (AC) assessment, until 20 February 2013.
On 10 June 2012, the applicants medical provider indicated on
an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention
Processing, that she is and has been on multiple medications to
cause unwanted weight gain.
On 11 July 2012, the applicants medical provider indicated on
an AF Form 108, that she has multiple reasons that she would not
be able to pass a physical training test.
On 1 August 2012, the applicant was promoted to the grade of
master sergeant (E-7).
On 21 August 2012, the applicants medical provider indicated
that she had a documented medical condition that precluded her
from achieving a passing score in the non-exempt portions of her
14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 02 July 2012
FA tests.
On an undated letter, the applicants medical provider indicated
that she had a documented medical condition that precluded her
from achieving a passing score in a non-exempt portion of her
16 November 2010 FA tests.
On 28 March 2013, the applicant was relieved from active duty
and permanently retired for physical disability, effective
29 March 2013, with a combined compensable disability rating of
40 percent. The applicant was credited with 18 years, 7 months,
and 12 days total active service for retirement.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicants request to
have her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012,
3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessments removed from
the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS) because she had
documented medical conditions that precluded her from achieving
passing scores in non-exempt portions of the contested FAs.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 17 February 2013 for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect
to the applicants requests related to her fitness assessments
(FA). We took notice of the applicants complete submission in
judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicants contested FAs should be declared void and removed
due to her medical conditions. As for the applicants request
to remove her referral enlisted performance report (EPR) and
restore the original effective date of her promotion to the
grade of master sergeant, in view of the fact that we have
determined the contested FA scores should be removed, and the
applicants FA failure formed the sole basis of the referral EPR
and promotion deferral, we believe it would be appropriate to
recommend approval of the applicants remaining requests.
Therefore, we recommend the applicants records be corrected as
indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that:
a. Her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012,
3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessments (FA) be
declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management
System (AFFMS).
b. The AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru
TSgt), rendered for the period 17 November 2009 through
16 November 2010, be declared void and removed from her records.
c. She was promoted to the grade of master sergeant (E-7),
effective and with a date of rank of 1 December 2010, instead of
1 August 2012.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04609 in Executive Session on 9 July 2013, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04609 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 October 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 30 January 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 February 2013.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04719
At the time of the FA, he suffered from multiple serious medical conditions which warranted exemption from the full FA; however, he was required to take the AC portion. On 22 Nov 10, the applicants Wing Medical Group issued a memorandum, Clarification of AC Exemption Recommendation for FA, establishing the Exercise Physiologist working with the Senior Profile Officer as the only authorities who could recommend to commanders medical exemptions from components of an FA for a member with Duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04690
On 24 March 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 May 2011. On 17 May 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 June 2011. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00324
On or about 18 March 2011, the applicant requested a two-week extension of the close-out date of the contested report to include a successful fitness assessment. On 24 November 2013, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board voided the Fitness Assessments, dated 26 August 2004, 21 July 2005, 21 February 2006, 4 April 2008 and 14 October 2009, and they have been removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System. Moreover, we also recognize that she would have been able to successfully...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01097
Members will be eligible for FA 42 days after the expiration date of physical limitations, as annotated on Air Force (AF) Form 469. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of the applicant’s FA, dated 29 November 2011, be updated to reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In accordance with AFI 36-2603,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02775
________________________________________________________________ On 7 Jan 14, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) disapproved the applicants request for removal of his failed FAs from the AFFMS stating that he should have tested within the limits of his profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the request for removal of the failed FAs dated 4 Apr 11 and 14 Nov 11 due to the lack of supporting...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468
A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...