Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02702
Original file (BC-2011-02702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02702 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The fitness assessment scores he received on 23 Apr 10, 27 Oct 
10, 14 Jan 11 and 14 Apr 11, be removed from the Air Force 
Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He attended a mandatory primary care manager (PCM) appointment on 
4 May 11, and his PCM indicated/documented on his AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, “Member 
has been evaluated and has a medical condition precluding the 
achievement of a passing fitness score.” 

 

His PCM has written a memorandum documenting treatment of his 
medical conditions over the time period from Apr 10 to present, 
that specifies he was “unable to utilize the maximum benefit of 
weight control via cardiovascular exercise.” He recently began 
an exercise program that is in line with his Physical Training 
(PT) restrictions and should allow him to achieve and maintain a 
waist line that meets Air Force standards of weight and fitness. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
AFFMS Individual Fitness Assessment History, AF Form 108, e-mail 
correspondence, and a memorandum from his PCM. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 


USAF/A1PP recommends denial. A1PP states this request was 
reviewed by the Aerospace Medicine Policy subject matter expert 
(SME) from AF/SG3 and A1PP and both do not concur with the 
applicant’s request to remove his three “Unsatisfactory” Fitness 
Assessment scores from AFFMS. Even though the applicant had a 
running profile, he was still responsible for maintaining waist 
measurement standards which could have been achieved via other 
cardiovascular means and by diet alteration. Additionally, the 
applicant’s fitness history illustrates a long term pattern of 
borderline/unfit performance that shows minimal effort to 
improve. 

 

The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

He suffers from various recent medical afflictions that have 
hindered his ability to effectively lose weight to meet the new 
abdominal standards, that were not included as part of his 
original request. His medical conditions are crucial to the 
ability to achieve the abdominal circumference imposed by the Air 
Force in Jul 2010. 

 

The alleged long term pattern of borderline/unfit performance can 
be directly attributed to his unmanaged obstructive sleep apnea 
that was initially diagnosed in 1997. There are a multitude of 
medical studies that show the correlation of inadequate and 
disrupted sleep associated with obstructive sleep apnea, that 
conclude weight gain and metabolic instability are a complication 
and/or result of his current diagnosed condition. 

 

In Oct 10, after ineffectively and unsuccessfully losing weight 
or waist measurement, he sought medical treatment from his PCM. 
He modified his diet in-line with nutritional guidance provided 
by the local health and wellness center nutritionist. 

 

Recent data suggests that treatment of obstructive sleep apnea 
with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will decrease not 
only leptin levels but also central obesity, independent of any 
overall change in body weight after treatment. This can be 
substantiated in some portion to the successful reduction in his 
waistline and weight as evidenced in his most recent satisfactory 
fitness assessment dated 13 Jul 11, where he lost a significant 
four inches in his waistline, since his Oct 10 unsatisfactory 
assessment. 

 

In addition to the obstructive sleep apnea, he was also treated 
for chronic knee pain, and diagnosed with Stage 3 Osteoarthritis 
in his left knee. Despite these limitations, he pursued PT 
regularly, and was recognized as one of the most avid 
participants in his unit’s fitness program prior to his surgical 
procedure. 

 


His last medical affliction, compounded with obstructive sleep 
apnea and his osteoarthritis, was a torn cartridge in his left 
wrist, that required a surgical procedure in Jan 11, which is 
documented in his medical records. 

 

He asks the Board to consider his medical conditions and 
complications and how they have negatively impacted his ability 
to meet the Air Force’s fitness requirements in relation to the 
new abdominal circumference, and how his long term affliction of 
obstructive sleep apnea has notably affected his fitness 
assessment scores in previous years. 

 

He considers his fitness assessment results an injustice since 
his PCM can only grant an exception in abdominal circumference in 
cases of pregnancy or abdominal surgery, neither which apply to 
him. 

 

The applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the 
applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that he has been 
the victim of an error or injustice. In this respect we note the 
applicant was under a modified testing program which excluded 
cardiovascular assessment and pushups; despite the modified 
testing protocol, the applicant failed to attain passing scores. 
He states that OSA and other medical conditions prevented him 
from attaining a passing score. However, we find the evidence 
submitted in support of his appeal is insufficient to conclude 
that his medical conditions y interfered with his ability to pass 
his fitness evaluations. Therefore we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Accordingly, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 


the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2011-02702 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Jun 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ USAF/A1PP, undated. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Aug 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Sep 11, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738

    Original file (BC 2013 02738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01118

    Original file (BC-2011-01118.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01118 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The fitness assessment (FA) score he received on 31 Jan 11 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was exempt from 3 of the 4...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02597

    Original file (BC-2012-02597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant provided AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 2 May 2011, 11 October 2011, and 29 January 2012, which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run, pushups, and sit-up components of the contested FAs, she was evaluated on the height, weight, and abdominal circumference in accordance with her profile. Therefore, we find it reasonable to conclude that had her condition been timely diagnosed, competent authority would likely have exempted her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01893

    Original file (BC-2011-01893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, he has not received an Air Force Form 422, for the purpose of physical fitness testing, to date. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PP recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04690

    Original file (BC-2012-04690.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 March 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 May 2011. On 17 May 2011, the applicant was issued an AF Form 422, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile run and sit-up components of the FA, until 10 June 2011. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02932

    Original file (BC-2011-02932.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02932 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her fitness assessments, dated 8 September 2010 and 27 October 2010, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794

    Original file (BC 2012 05794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794

    Original file (BC 2012 05794.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02592

    Original file (BC 2013 02592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    from the Unit CC;” and Atch 1, Para 13 “If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.” The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score AC Measurement Rating 2 Aug 2013 82.20 38.00” Satisfactory 15 May 2013 16.50 39.50” Unsatisfactory 6 Nov 2012 83.30 38.50” Satisfactory *24 Oct 2012 0.00 40.00” Unsatisfactory 30 Jul 2012 74.10 39.00” Unsatisfactory *Annotates Contested FA: On 7 Jan 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000

    Original file (BC 2012 05000.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...