RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04582
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her pay grade be restored to technical sergeant (E-6).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She asked for help; however, people were reluctant to get
involved. She claims she was falsely accused for not
participating in training. She provides 20 pages of her Military
Leave and Earning Statements (LES) that show she earned 113
retirement points in 1994-1995 timeframe.
In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her
involuntary demotion order, a copy of NRPCC 1070/124, Naval
Reserve Personnel Center Annual Retirement Point Record, a copy
of a letter from the Naval Reserve Force Commander, an excerpt
from AFI 36-2503-, Administrative Demotion of Airmen, and copies
of her LES.
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
According to the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) the
applicant has 21 years of satisfactory service and is waiting
retirement in the grade of airman first class (E-3). H
Reserve Order A-287, dated 12 Jul 95, reflects that she was
involuntarily demoted from technical sergeant (E-6) to staff
sergeant (E-5). However, her record is absent on further
demotion actions. class.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states that under the Air Force
Reserve Demotion Policy, airmen are afforded the opportunity to
appeal demotions. A1K attempted to obtain demotion appeal
documentation in support of her request; however, the applicant
was unavailable for questioning.
The AFRC/A1K complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit
B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 27 May 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-04582 in Executive Session on 12 Oct 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010-04582
was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Nov 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 21 May 11, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 May 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00436
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00436 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her rank of master sergeant (E-7) be reinstated with her original date of rank of 1 January 2008. The discharge board that convened on 27 January 2011 found the applicant did not wrongfully use marijuana and recommended she be retained in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicantÂ’s MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01452
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01452 INDEX CODE: A94.05/06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears the applicant is requesting that his General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable and his former rank of technical sergeant (E-6) be restored. On...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02002
Subsequently, it was determined the former content of AFI 2503, Administrative Demotion of Airman, and AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion Program, dated 6 Aug 02, would continue to be used as the procedural guidance to implement the AFR Enlisted Demotion and Promotion Policy. We took note of the applicant’s arguments regarding the validity of the demotion instructions ,however, we agree with AFRC/A1K recommendation that the use of the former AFI 36-2503 and Air 36-2502 as the procedural guidance...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02152
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be transferred to the Retired Reserve awaiting retired pay at age 60 rather than discharged. The applicant has not provided any documentation to support her claim that she should not have been discharged from the AFR, i.e., application for...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04564
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. Air Force Reserve enlisted members are recommended for promotion by the assigned supervisor and approved by the promotion authority. As for her request related to retirement, Air Force Reserve members must have 20 years of satisfactory service or have 15 but less than 20 years...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03238
In support of his requests, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the Memorandum for Non-recommendation for Promotion, his 2 Nov 08 PT score, Member Utilization Questionnaire, email communiques, EPP Eligibility Rosters, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, a Point Credit History Summary, and various other documents associated with his request. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02744
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02744 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: a. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. We...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04813
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) enlisted promotion and demotion policy was folded into an active duty Air Force publication AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion/Demotion Programs, 31 December 2009. Air Force Reserve enlisted members are promoted to chief master sergeant in accordance with AFPD 36-25, Military Promotion and Demotions and Air Force Reserve Enlisted Promotion Policy. Based on this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04084
In support of her request, the applicant submits copies of her AF IMT 348, Line of Duty Determination, report of medical evaluation letter dated 29 November 2005, statements of earned civilian income, and email correspondence pertaining to her INCAP pay application. The Air Force office of primary responsibility reviewed her request and determined that she had not exhausted her administrative remedies for requesting incapacitation pay in accordance with AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for...