Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2003-00371-3
Original file (BC-2003-00371-3.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00371-3 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

                            ADDENDUM TO 
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
     
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His original disability rating for sleep apnea be reinstated to 
30 percent and that his retired status be restored. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On  25  Sep  03  and  19  Nov  08,  the  Board  considered  and  denied 
similar  appeals,  in  which  he  requested  his  original  disability 
rating for sleep apnea be reinstated to 30 percent and that his 
retired  status  be  restored.    He  also  asked  to  be  medically 
retired with a 100 percent disability rating effective 25 Aug 02.  
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the 
applicant’s request, and the rationale of the earlier decisions 
of the Board, see the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings, with 
attachments, at Exhibit L. 
 
By  application,  dated  12  Nov  10,  the  applicant  requests 
reconsideration  of  his  request,  contending  he  was  contacted  by 
the  BCMR  Medical  Consultant  advising  him  to  resubmit  his 
application based on a change in the law. 
 
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits copies of e-mails 
and a letter, dated 9 Nov 10. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit M. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
The  BCMR  Medical  Consultant  recommends  granting  relief  by 
changing  the  record  to  reflect  the  applicant  was  permanently 
retired  with  a  combined  disability  rating  of  60  percent,  for 
Obstructive  Sleep Apnea and Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical 
Spine, effective the previously established date of his removal 
from the Temporary Disability Retired List and separation. 
 
The  BCMR  Medical  Consultant  states  that  while  conducting  a 
quality  review  of  cases  based  upon  the  changes  in  the  law,  he 
noted  a  probable  error  and  injustice  in  the  previous  decisions 

rendered  on  the  applicant’s  case.    Specifically,  the  National 
Defense Authorization Act of 2008 determined Military Departments 
will adhere to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Veterans 
Administration  Schedule  of  Rating  Disabilities  (VASRD),  or 
mutually  (Department  of  Defense/DVA)  agreed  upon  policies  when 
determining disability ratings. 
 
The  complete  BCMR  Medical  Consultant’s  evaluation  is  at 
Exhibit N.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
He  concurs  with  the  opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  BCMR 
Medical Consultant. 
 
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit P.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
Sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate 
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice  to  warrant  changing  the 
applicant’s  discharge  to  a  disability  retirement.    Having 
carefully  reviewed  this  application,  we  agree  with  the 
recommendation  of  the  BCMR  Medical  Consultant  and  adopt  his 
rationale as the basis of our decision the applicant has been the 
victim of an error and injustice and should be retired by reason 
of  physical  disability,  with  a  60  percent  combined  disability 
rating.    Accordingly,  we  recommend  the  applicant’s  records  be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: 
 
a.  On  24  August  2002,  he  was  found  unfit  to  perform  the 
 
duties of his office, rank, grade or rating by reason of physical 
disability, incurred while he was entitled to receive basic pay; 
that  the  diagnoses  in  his  case  were  Obstructive  Sleep  Apnea, 
VASRD  Code  6847,  rated  at  50  percent  and  Degenerative  Disc 
Disease,  Cervical  Spine,  VASRD  Code  5242,  rated  at  10  percent; 
that  the  total  combined  compensable  percentage  was  60  percent; 
that the degree of impairment was permanent; that the disability 
was  not  due  to  intentional  misconduct  or  willful  neglect;  that 
the disability was not incurred during a period of unauthorized 
absence; and that the disability was not received in the line of 
duty  as  a  direct  result  of  armed  conflict  or  caused  by  an 
instrumentality of war. 

 

 

 
  2 

 
 
 

, Panel Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 

 
b.  He  was  not  discharged  by  reason  of  a  physical 
disability with entitlement to severance pay on 25 August 2002, 
but  on  that  date  his  name  was  removed  from  the  Temporary 
Disability Retired List and he was permanently retired by reason 
of  a  physical  disability,  with  a  60  percent  compensable 
disability rating.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2003-00371  in  Executive  Session  on  17  March  2011,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 

 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
     Exhibit L.  Addendum to Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Jan 
                 09, w/atchs. 
     Exhibit M.  Letter, Applicant, dated 12 Nov 10, w/atchs. 
     Exhibit N.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 3 Feb 11. 
     Exhibit O.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Feb 11. 
     Exhibit P.  Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Feb 11. 
 
 
 
 
                                    
                                   Panel Chair 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
  3 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00371

    Original file (BC-2003-00371.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. Following DPPD’s assessment, they conclude the applicant was treated fairly throughout the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, that he was properly rated under federal disability guidelines at the time of his evaluation, and that he was afforded the opportunity for further review as provided by federal law and policy. As...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00557

    Original file (PD2011-00557.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the cervical spine and OSA conditions as unfitting; assigning a disability rating of 10% to the cervical condition citing criteria of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); and, 0% to the OSA condition referencing Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39. Other PEB Conditions . The other conditions forwarded by the MEB and adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB were lumbar spondylosis (pain dating to same fall as for the cervical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003774

    Original file (20130003774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * a self-authored statement, dated 13 February 2013 * his DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings), convened on 2 March 2010 * his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 8 December 2011 * a letter from U.S. Army human Resources Command (HRC) CRSC Branch, dated 13 December 2012 * two letters of support, dated 12 July and 27 August 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014079

    Original file (20100014079.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided a self-authored statement, sleep study, and a letter from a physician as new evidence that will be considered by the Board. This office stated that there was insufficient evidence to conclude that a PEB would have found the applicant unfit for sleep apnea in 2000 and that military disability compensation can only be provided if there was a finding of unfitness for that condition. The opinion stated the applicant: * was separated from the military with severance pay...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00415

    Original file (PD2011-00415.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    A January 2004 clinic encounter during a flare of LBP and the April 2004 orthopedic NARSUM indicated normal or near normal motion without muscle spasm while the March 2004 MEB examination recorded significantly reduced ROM. Other PEB Conditions . The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00192

    Original file (PD2013 00192.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The back and sleep apnea conditions, characterized as “lumbar spine, DDD w/chronic low back pain” and “obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), requiring CPAP” [continuous positive airway pressure], were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded 10 other conditions for PEB adjudication. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with military service, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00099

    Original file (PD2012-00099.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the MEB NARSUM evaluation, performed on 5 September 2002, the CI reported low back pain and radiation of pain down left leg. In the matter of the sleep apnea condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 50%, coded 6847 IAW VASRD §4.97. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical separation for disability with severance pay.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00649

    Original file (PD2011-00649.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the lumbar spine condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy; the left ankle condition as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); the OSA condition as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39; and, the pes planus condition as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of the USAPDA pain...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017822

    Original file (20130017822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    For his unfitting disabilities, the VA proposed a 50 percent combined rating as follows: * Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (claimed as shortness of breath) 30 percent * Degenerative disc disease, lumbar spine (claimed as back condition) 10 percent * Left shoulder strain with post-surgical pain (claimed as left shoulder condition) 10 percent * Cervicalgia with degenerative disc disease, cervical spine (also claimed as neck condition) 10 percent b. For his service-connected disabilities, the VA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016070

    Original file (20130016070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, addition of the following medical conditions to his unfitting conditions and an increase in his disability rating: * post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) * degenerative disc disease (spine with right upper extremity radiculopathy) * sleep apnea 2. He was initially rated for PTSD in September 2008, but an MEB psychiatrist downgraded the PTSD diagnosis to an Army MEB diagnosis of major depression with anxiety disorder and the PEB rated this condition as 30...