RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03850
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. He be promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).
2. His Date of Rank (DOR) be adjusted and he receive back pay.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His promotion has been unjustly held up. In Dec 09, he was
informed that he was promoted and that his name would soon show
up on a promotion roster. When another unit member was promoted
before him, he began questioning what was going on. He and five
other unit members were not given credit for one drill. He spoke
with his supervisor, the orderly room, and a senior Air Reserve
Technician, who told him the issue was being worked out through
the command finance department. In the end, he was not given
credit for the drill. His chain of command keeps telling him it
is just a matter of time for the list to come out; however, he
still has not been promoted.
In support of his request, the applicant provides printouts from
the virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF).
The applicants submission, with attachments is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve (AFR)
in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these
facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states the applicant was asked
to provide substantiating supporting documentation; however, he
did not have anything other than what had already been provided.
A1K notes that in the Reserve, enlisted members are promoted IAW
AFPD 36-25 and AFR Promotion Policy, which means he needed to be
recommended by the assigned supervisor and approved by the
promotion authority (commander). The applicant did not provide
any supporting documentation that proves his DOR and promotion
effective date (PED) should be adjusted.
The AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 4 Mar 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-03850 in Executive Session on 19 Jul 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Oct 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 3 Feb 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00301
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00301 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her promotion effective date (PED) to the grade of airman (E-2) be changed to 21 Mar 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05059
She had a break in service from 4 Nov 10 until 14 Jan 11, at which time she reenlisted in the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicants correct...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03172
Thus, as a matter of record, the applicants DIERF cannot be prior to the date that he accepted the Oath of Office, i.e., the member is not a Reserve officer until such time as the Oath of Office is executed. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02002
Subsequently, it was determined the former content of AFI 2503, Administrative Demotion of Airman, and AFI 36-2502, Airman Promotion Program, dated 6 Aug 02, would continue to be used as the procedural guidance to implement the AFR Enlisted Demotion and Promotion Policy. We took note of the applicant’s arguments regarding the validity of the demotion instructions ,however, we agree with AFRC/A1K recommendation that the use of the former AFI 36-2503 and Air 36-2502 as the procedural guidance...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00566
His date of rank (DOR) and effective date of promotion is 1 December 2011. Upon completing the Article 15 punishment action, the applicant became eligible for promotion the following day to the rank of Airman, (E-2). Based on documentation, (AF Form 3070A), provided, the request to adjust the applicant’s promotion eligibility date (PED) and Date of Rank (DOR) meets the basic requirements for correction of his promotion history to 23 June 2011 versus 1 July 2011, his requested date.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02423
Furthermore, if the applicant had been granted career status while being assigned to the CMSgt position it would have meant that she could have remained at Scott AFB until 2019 when she becomes eligible for an active duty retirement. We note the applicants assertion that she was selected for the superintendent position and subsequently promoted to the grade of CMSgt and due to her selection for the superintendent position her date of separation should be changed to 28 Feb 14. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00013
After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicants complete submission, we are not persuaded her records should be corrected to show she was promoted to technical sergeant (E-6). We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of proof of the existence of either an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05229
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05229 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) with a date of rank and promotion effective date of 22 Mar 12. The applicant would have been eligible for promotion to the grade of E-2 on 7 May 12, after completing Basic...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01457
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01457 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted a waiver for being twice deferred for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5) while on Active duty so he may transfer to the Air Force Reserve (AFR). Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice with regards to the applicants request for a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03171
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his enlistment, he was advised that he would be enlisting as an E-3 (airman first class) under the Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...