RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01872
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge or uncharacterized entry level separation)
be changed to a code that will allow her to reenlist.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was separated due to academics and is unable to join another
branch of service.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 21 Jul 09, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force as an
aerospace medical service apprentice.
On 17 Mar 10, the applicant was notified of pending discharge
action. Specifically, the commander cited unsatisfactory
performance as the basis for discharge. The applicant failed
the National Registry for Emergency Medical Technicians four
times. Prior to disenrollment, the applicant was washed back,
received two hours of individual assistance and counseling, and
attended classes on test-taking and study skills.
On 22 Mar 10, she acknowledged receipt, consulted with counsel,
and waived her right to submit statements in her own behalf. On
23 Mar 10, the staff judge advocate found the case legally
sufficient and recommended discharge.
On 31 Mar 10, the discharge authority concurred and directed
discharge. The applicant was discharged with an honorable
discharge for unsatisfactory performance and a RE code of 2C.
She was credited with eight months and ten days of active
service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicants
RE code of 2C is required based on her involuntary discharge
with an honorable service characterization. Further, she does
not provide proof of an error or injustice in reference to her
RE code and only states she wants to rejoin.
The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 26 Nov 10 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2010-01872 in Executive Session on 3 February 2011, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 May 10.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28 Oct 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00531
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00531 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to a 1C. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of JFW which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02363
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02363 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected as follows: 1. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02933
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01996
The applicant provided no facts warranting a change to her separation code or narrative reason for separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00351
The four test failures were evidence of her lack of motivation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While it is true she was counseled multiple times for her failures, she would like to make it clear that her academic deficiencies are not because of her lack of motivation. She failed this course, but it does not mean she would fail out of every course of study in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01078
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with a honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 4C RE Code (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00485
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00485 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE code 1C and that she be allowed to return to active duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04590
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04590 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service or involuntary honorable discharge) be changed so that she can be eligible to rejoin the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00925
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS finds no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the applicants master personnel record, the discharge to include the SPD code, the narrative reason for separation and character of service was consistent with the procedural and...