RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01996
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes Involuntarily
separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation
without characterization of service be changed to 1 which
denotes eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not
yet considered under the Selective Reenlistment Program.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Even though she failed her career development course (CDC), it is
unfair she was not given the option to retrain into a different
career field.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in
this Record of Proceedings.
On 26 February 2007, the commander notified her that he was
recommending her discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory
performance. The specific reason for this action is the
applicant failed to score satisfactorily on her CDC.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant received
counseling on several occasions and was afforded ample
opportunity to overcome her deficiencies. DPSOS found no error
or injustices in the processing of the discharge action. Based
on the documentation in the master personnel record, the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the
discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant provided no
facts warranting a change to her separation code or narrative
reason for separation.
The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant does not
state her RE code is wrong nor does she provide any evidence an
error or injustice in reference to her RE code. The applicants
RE code is driven by her involuntary separation for
unsatisfactory performance with an honorable discharge.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to applicant on
17 December 2010 for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting his request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-01996 in Executive Session on 15 February 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, 16 May 2010, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 9 Nov 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 15 Nov 10
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Dec 10.
Panel Chair AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01940
On 24 Mar 00, the applicant was discharged by reason of unsatisfactory performance, and received an RE code of 2C. DPSOS found no error or injustice in the processing of the discharge action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00555
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. When the discharge authority approved the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable character of service, her RE Code should have been changed to “2C” Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge or Entry Level Separation Without...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01987
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of character reference letters, her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States; letters recommendation, and extracts from her master personnel record. DPSOA states the applicants RE code of 4H is the only description applicable for members serving a suspended Article 15 punishment. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01562
On 29 Jan 91, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance. On 1 Feb 91, the legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support separation and recommended the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. AFPC/DPSOS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04032
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04032 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) His reentry code (RE) 2C (involuntary separation with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01119
The applicant concurred with his supervisor’s recommendation and stated that he would rather separate from the Air Force instead of retraining. On 16 Jan 09, the applicant received a referral enlisted performance report (EPR), for violations of Article 86, UCMJ, failing to report to duty at the prescribed time and twice failing his CDC EOC exam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01119 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00168
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00168 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE code) be changed from 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) to a code that will allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02097
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service and separation program designator (SPD) codes be changed so that she can serve again in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03928
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 4K, which denotes medically disqualified or pending medical evaluation board (MEB) or physical evaluation board (PEB) be changed to a RE code that will allow her to reenlist without a waiver. On 27 March 2002, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00351
The four test failures were evidence of her lack of motivation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While it is true she was counseled multiple times for her failures, she would like to make it clear that her academic deficiencies are not because of her lack of motivation. She failed this course, but it does not mean she would fail out of every course of study in the...