RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00558
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be
changed to allow him to enlist in the Army Reserve.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He made a mistake while he was in the Air Force. He has
reevaluated his life and changed the way he approaches
responsibility and use of computer equipment.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 18 Jul 00, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the
Regular Air Force as services journeyman.
On 13 Apr 04, the applicant received an Article 15 for wrongfully
storing and displaying sexually explicit material on a government
computer. His punishment consisted of reduction in rank,
forfeiture of $668.00 of pay per month for two months suspended
and 45 days of extra duty suspended.
He was honorably discharged on 17 Jul 04. He was credited with
four years of active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states that Control Roster
actions are not filed in the service members personnel records,
or the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS). The MilPDS
reflects the applicant was serving an Article 15 until the day of
discharge. Since his Article 15 expired the same day of his
discharge, his correct RE code would be 4E (Grade is airman first
class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months
for a 6-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or, grade is
airman first class or below and the airman is a second-term or
career airman). Therefore his RE code will be administratively
corrected to 4E unless the Board directs otherwise. DPSOA
further stated although the applicants RE code will be updated,
this update will not make the applicant eligible for
reenlistment.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
14 May 10, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. The
evidence of record indicates the applicant was discharged after
completing four years of service with an RE code of 4I. There
was no evidence submitted or located in the applicants records
to reflect he was serving a Control Roster action, however, the
records do reflect he was serving an Article 15 action until the
day of his discharge. We have been advised the RE code of 4I is
erroneous and his records will be corrected administratively by
the Air Force office of primary responsibility to reflect the
appropriate RE code of 4E. As this code accurately reflects the
circumstances of his discharge, we agree with the administrative
correction. However, after a thorough review of the evidence
presented, we are not persuaded that further changes to this RE
code to allow his reentry into military service is warranted. In
view of the above, and in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we conclude that no basis exist to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00558 in Executive Session on 13 Jul 10, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 10.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 19 Apr 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 May 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00752
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping program. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01150
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01150 INDEX CODE: 100.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCTOBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02430
However, if the applicant has evidence to show the effective date or the expiration date of the Control Roster action, the Board may consider changing the RE code. HQ AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the Control Roster would have expired by the time he was discharged. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Sep 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00574
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00574 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4I (serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 10 Jul 06, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for failure to provide a proper family care plan. The applicant was discharged...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02051
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Sep 97 as an airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. The RE code of 4I is correct since the applicant was on the Control Roster at the time of his separation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00579
He did his separation paperwork on 20 Jul 02, one month shy of the six months; therefore, he received a RE code of 4E, even though his military separation date with the United States Air Force was 5 Sep 02. He was assigned RE code “4E” which denotes “Grade is airman first class or below and airman completed 31 or more months (55 months for 6-year enlistees), if a first-term airman; or, grade is airman first class or below and the airman is a second-term or career airman.” He was assigned...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00461
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00461 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenlist into military service. Accordingly, if the Board is not compelled to grant the relief he seeks, his record will be administratively corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02151
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. While the applicant contends he does not know why he was issued an RE code of 4I, a personnel data RIP retrieved on 12 June 2014 indicates he was on the control roster at the time of his separation. As of this date, no response has been received by this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02969
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02969 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested early separation from the Air Force with an effective date of 17 December 2012. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 December 2013.