RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00461
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be
changed to allow him to reenlist into military service.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Based on the RE code he received, he is not eligible to serve in
the armed forces.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
DD Forms 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 17 Sep 01, the applicant contracted his enlistment in the
Regular Air Force. He was honorably discharged on 1 Jul 04. He
was credited with 2 years, 9 months, and 15 days of active
service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to change
his RE code to a code that would allow reentry into military
service. The applicant was furnished a referral enlisted
performance report (EPR) for the period ending 15 May 04 which
reflects he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to
report for duty. He was placed on the Control Roster and an
Unfavorable Information File (UIF) was established. He
subsequently received another LOR and Control Roster/UIF action
for a technical data violation. On 17 May 04, the applicants
supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment
Program Consideration, and nonrecommended the applicant for
continued service. The applicants commander concurred and
nonselected the applicant for continued service on 19 May 04.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of the action and elected to
submit an appeal. However, no appeal decision was noted on the
AF Form 418; therefore, it must be presumed that he failed to
submit an appeal within the prescribed time frame. It should be
noted the applicant should have been issued an RE code of 2X
(First term, second term or career Airman considered but not
selected under the SRP). While the 4I RE code is technically
incorrect, the applicant has provided no evidence to support his
request for a code that would allow him to reenlist.
Accordingly, if the Board is not compelled to grant the relief he
seeks, his record will be administratively corrected to reflect
the 2X RE code.
The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
25 Mar 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision the
applicant has failed to sustain his burden of proof of the
existence of an error or injustice. Although the RE code the
applicant received at separation was technically incorrect, he
has not provided any evidence to support a change of the RE code
to allow him reentry into military service. We further note his
record will be administratively corrected to reflect the 2X RE
code which accurately reflects the circumstances of his
separation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-00461 in Executive Session on 27 Sep 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Jan 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Military Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 14 Feb 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letters SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Mar 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00382
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. At the time of the applicants discharge he received an erroneous RE code of 4I. While the 4I RE code is technically incorrect, the applicant has provided no evidence to support his request for a code that would allow him to reenlist.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05688 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed. On 18 Apr 07, he was honorably discharged from active duty with an RE code of 4I and narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service. He...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01474
On 3 Jul 12, AFPC/DPSOA requested the applicant provide the documents she contends were added to her appeal package without due process. On 24 Jul 12, in response to DPSOA’s request, she stated after submitting her appeal package to the Force Support Squadron, she inquired about the status and was informed her unit had provided additional documentation (i.e. LOC, dated 7 Sep 11, LOC, dated 3 Nov 11, and a LOR, dated 2 Mar 12) to legal for their recommendation to the group commander. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03060
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his SPD code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding the processing of his discharge. On 28 May 14, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04992
On 9 May 2012, the applicant submitted an additional response to his denial of reenlistment and demotion action because he indicated that he just received the ROI. On 19 September 2012, by authority of the Secretary of the Air Force, his 3 August 2012 request for redress filed under Article 138 was denied as the actions taken by the command were determined to be appropriate to the circumstances. The applicants discharge was correctly administered on the basis of his RE code of 2X (denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03715
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03715 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive a reenlistment (RE) code that would enable her to reenlist in the Air Force or at least, in the Air National Guard (ANG) and that the following be removed from her record: 1. While she contends she received...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02969
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02969 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested early separation from the Air Force with an effective date of 17 December 2012. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 December 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04859
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.