Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03558
Original file (BC-2009-03558.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2009-03558
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
            COUNSEL:

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general discharge be upgraded to honorable.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His prior service record  was  unblemished.   He  was  experiencing  marital
problems and abused alcohol during the time in question.

In support of this request, the applicant submits a copy of  a  letter  from
the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA).

The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Any honorable  periods  of  military  service  entitles  a  veteran  to  DVA
benefits.  The applicant received an honorable character of service  on  his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from  Active  Duty,  issued
for the period of 6 Sep 78 through 25 Jul 84.

The applicant’s discharge case file is not included in his  records.   On  3
May 89, the applicant was discharged with a  general  character  of  service
for Misconduct-Pattern Conduct Prejudicial to  Good  Order  and  Discipline.
He served nine years, one month and six days on active duty.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of  Investigation  (FBI)
provided a copy of an Investigative Report, which is at  Exhibit  C.   On  1
Dec 09, a copy of the FBI report and a request for post-service  information
was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days, as  of
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we  find  no
evidence  of  an  error  or  injustice  that  occurred  in   the   discharge
processing.  Based on the available  evidence  of  record,  it  appears  the
discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the  discharge
regulation  and  within  the  commander's  discretionary   authority.    The
applicant has provided no evidence  which  would  lead  us  to  believe  the
characterization of the service  was  contrary  to  the  provisions  of  the
governing regulation, unduly harsh,  or  disproportionate  to  the  offenses
committed.  In addition, in view of the contents of the  FBI  Identification
Record we are not persuaded that the  characterization  of  the  applicant’s
discharge warrants an upgrade on the basis of clemency.  Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  upon  which  to
recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 7 Jul 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Panel Chair
      Member
      Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009-03558:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jun 10, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  FBI Report.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 1 Dec 09.




                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01811

    Original file (BC-2009-01811.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s UOTHC discharge. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03888

    Original file (BC-2009-03888.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-03888 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01168

    Original file (BC 2009 01168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 10 Sep 90, the applicant appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 May 09.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01168

    Original file (BC-2009-01168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. On 10 Sep 90, the applicant appeared before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 8 May 09.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01667

    Original file (BC-2009-01667.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant re-enlisted on 5 Dec 55 for a period of four years. By letter, dated 27 Jul 09, Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, XXXXXXX County Veterans Service Officer, attests to the applicant’s good character, eluding to his struggle with alcohol and citing the lack of help for alcoholics in “the old days” (Exhibit F). The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01667 in Executive Session on 1 Sep 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01028

    Original file (BC 2009 01028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01028 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. Applicant appealed to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable. Based on the available evidence of record,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02355

    Original file (BC-2009-02355.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for unsatisfactory performance was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 31...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00225

    Original file (BC-2009-00225.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had no idea about the effects of drug addiction, neither did the Air Force at that time. On 6 Mar 86, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, by reason of misconduct – drug abuse, with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00039

    Original file (BC-2009-00039.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s general discharge for minor disciplinary infractions was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02864

    Original file (BC-2009-02864.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-02864 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant was discharged on 3 Jun 81. Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 1 Dec 09.