Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03650
Original file (BC-2007-03650.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-03650
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show that he was awarded  the  Meritorious  Unit
Award (MUA).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 26 Sep 07, Special Order (SO) G-3756 was issued  from  USCENTAF  for  the
award of the MUA for the 332d Air Expeditionary  Wing  (332  AEW).   He  was
deployed to Iraq and attached to the 506 EOSS (a  subordinate  unit  of  the
332 AEW) for 129 days (19 May 06 to 24 Sep 06) .

In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter of evaluation,  an
excerpt  of  SO  G-3756,  Air  Force   Commendation   Medal   (AFCM)   medal
certificate, a travel voucher, and SO 2956, dated 29 Jul 05.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Feb 07, the  applicant  was  honorably  discharged  and  retired  from
active duty in the grade of technical sergeant.  He had served 21 years  and
24 days on active duty, to include 3 years, 6  months and 8 days of  foreign
service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial.   DPSIDR  states  the  MUA  is  given  for
exceptionally  meritorious  conduct  in  the  performance   of   outstanding
achievement or service in direct support of combat operations for  at  least
90 continuous days during the  period  of  military  operations  against  an
armed enemy of the United States on or after 11 Sep 01.

Special Order G-3756 dated 26 Sep 07, provided by the  applicant,  does  not
list his unit (506th EOSS) as sharing the MUA.  According to the  order  the
721st Expeditionary Air Mobility Operations Group,  Detachment  5,  was  the
only unit sharing in the award with the 332 AEW.

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In his response dated 3  Dec  07,  the  applicant  reiterates  much  of  his
earlier contentions; however, he also states SO G-3756, dated 26 Sep 07,  is
amended to include the 332 AEW, a subordinate unit, and the  506  EOSS  (his
unit) is a subordinate unit of the 332 AEW.

He opines the 721st EAMOG (Det 5) is sharing the award  with  the  332  AEW;
however, the 332 AEW consists of over  seventy  (70)  subordinate  units  of
which the 506 EOSS is one (see SO G-2956, dated 29 Jul 05).

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we are not persuaded  that
his records should be corrected to show he is entitled to the award  of  the
MUA.  Although Special Order G-2956 awards the  MUA  to  the  506  EOSS,  it
specifies the decoration period as 1  May  04  through  30 Apr  05  and  the
applicant's period of service  is  later.   Therefore,  we  agree  with  the
opinion  and  recommendation  of   the   Air   Force   office   of   primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved.  Therefore, the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  BC-2007-03650  in
Executive Session on 1 Apr 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

               Mr. John B. Hennessey, Panel Chair
               Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
               Ms. Judith B. Oliva, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 07, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 20 Nov 07.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Nov 07.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 3 Dec 07 w/atch.




                                   JOHN B. HENNESSEY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04754

    Original file (BC-2011-04754.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04754 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01505

    Original file (BC-2011-01505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIDR was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the SWASM w/1BSS for his service in Cairo West from 11 Mar 93 to 17 Jun 93, the ACM w/ 1BSS, the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFESR w/1OLC), and the NATO-ISAF for his service in Afghanistan from 4 Feb 07 to 9 Aug 07. The MUA is awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve and Guard units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding achievement or service in direct...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01886

    Original file (BC-2012-01886.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MUA is given to Active Duty Air Force, Reserve and Guard units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding achievement or service in direct support of combat operations for at least 90 continuous days during the period of military operations against an armed enemy of the United States on or after 11 Sep 11. DPSIDR states the applicant was awarded the MUA during his assignment to the 31st Combat Communications Squadron during the period 14 Jul 04 to 21 Apr 06....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03280

    Original file (BC-2008-03280.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03280 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be updated to reflect the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E), the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with Gold Border (AFESR w/GB), the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S), and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02509

    Original file (BC-2007-02509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02509 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 FEB 09 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal first Oak Leaf Cluster (1 OLC), Air Force Commendation Medal (3 OLC) with Valor, the Kosovo Campaign Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00255

    Original file (BC-2013-00255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated to reflect the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). However, with regard to the applicant’s specific request to have his DD Form 214 updated to include the AFEM,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01555

    Original file (BC-2010-01555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01555 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00625

    Original file (BC-2012-00625.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided United States Air Force Central (USAFCENT) special order G-00461, dated 9 Oct 09 and contends that her service with the Air Component Coordination Element in Afghanistan (ACCE-A) from 14 Dec 08 to 16 Jun 09, should qualify her for entitlement to the MUA. In response to their request, the applicant only provided page 2 of special order TE-0062. Regarding her request for entitlement to award of the NATO Medal-ISAF, AfgCM, and AFER w/GB, we note the applicant’s DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00269

    Original file (BC-2009-00269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the AFCM, 1OLC, indicating that based on the applicant’s military record and provided documentation, they were able to verify her entitlement to the AFEM for time served in Kuwait and the AFCM, Basic, based on Special Order GA-07. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02267

    Original file (BC-2010-02267.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02267 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with four Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/4 BSS) rather than the ICM with two Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/2 BSS); and to...