Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01970
Original file (BC-2007-01970.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-01970
                                        INDEX CODE:  111.02
  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                     COUNSEL:  NONE

                                        HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  23 December 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered  for  the  period  8 December
2003 through 15 June 2004 be voided and removed  from  his  records  or  the
promotion recommendation be changed.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The feedback date is incorrect; the feedback does not support the mark  down
ratings; the mark down in leadership  is  not  supported  by  the  quote  in
Section V from the 5 BW/CV; pen and ink changes were made to the  EPR  after
the close-out date; and the performance evaluation and rater’s comments  are
contradictory.

In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his EPRs  closing
15 June 2004 and 7 December  2003,  and  his  27  January  2004  Performance
Feedback Worksheet.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)  the  applicant  is
currently serving on active duty in the rank  of  technical  sergeant  (E-6)
with a date of rank of 1 May 2007.  He has a Total Active  Federal  Military
Service Date of 8 April 1998 and a projected date of separation  of  2  July
2008.

The following is a resume of the applicant’s EPR profile:

      PERIOD ENDING          PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION

     7 Dec 99 (A1C)                     5
     7 Dec 00 (SrA)                     5
     7 Dec 01                     5
     7 Dec 02 (SSgt)                    5
     7 Dec 03                     5
    15 Jun 04*                    4
    30 Apr 05                     5
    30 Apr 06                     5
    30 Apr 07                     5

* Contested report

As a result of the ERAB decision on 6  July  2007,  AFPC/DPPPE  changed  the
applicant’s feedback date in Section V of the contested  report  to  reflect
27 January 2004 versus 7 December 2003.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPEP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void his EPR  or
change the promotion recommendation.  DPPPEP states the applicant’s  request
was forwarded to the Evaluation Report  Appeals  Board  (ERAB)  for  review.
The ERAB changed the feedback date to 27 January 2004,  but  denied  voiding
the report or changing the promotion recommendation.  With the exception  of
the feedback date, the applicant’s request is prohibited in accordance  with
Air Force Instruction 36-2401, paragraph  1.3.1  and  paragraph  1.3.4.   An
incorrect feedback date and administrative  corrections  to  an  evaluator’s
signature date after the close-out date of the report are not  grounds  for,
nor  warrant  voiding  an  EPR.    These   are   authorized   administrative
corrections.   The  applicant  contends  comments  made  on  his   EPR   are
inconsistent with the assigned ratings; however, ratings are  not  erroneous
or  unjust  because  the  applicant  believes  they  are   inconsistent   or
contradictory to the  comments.   An  evaluation  report  is  considered  to
represent the rating chain’s  best  judgment  at  the  time  the  report  is
rendered.  Once a report is accepted for file, only strong evidence  to  the
contrary warrants removal of the report from the  applicant’s  record.   The
burden of proof is on the applicant and he failed to provide  substantiating
evidence  that  warrants  voiding  his  EPR  or   changing   the   promotion
recommendation.

The AFPC/DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant  on  27
July 2007, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice warranting favorable  consideration
of the applicant’s request to void the contested report and remove  it  from
his records or as an alternative, the promotion recommendation  be  changed.
We note the applicant’s assertions;  however,  with  the  exception  of  the
feedback date, we find no persuasive documentation was provided  to  support
these contentions.  Concerning the feedback date on the  contested  EPR,  we
note that AFPC administratively  corrected  the  applicant’s  feedback  date
from 7 December 2003 to correctly reflect 27 January 2004.  In view  of  the
above and in the absence of evidence showing  the  contested  report  is  an
inaccurate depiction of his performance during  the  evaluation  period,  we
agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the  Air  Force  office  of
primary responsibility.  Accordingly, his request to void his EPR or  change
the promotion recommendation is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 24 October 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Panel Chair
            Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
            Ms. Lea Gallogly, Member


The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with  AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2007-01970:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 Jun 07, w/atch.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPEP, dated 9 Jul 07.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jul 07.




                                  MICHAEL V. BARBINO
                                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00452

    Original file (BC-2007-00452.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of his EPRs; performance feedback evaluations; awards and decorations; letters of support; leave and earnings statements; temporary duty (TDY) documentation; excerpts of Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2406; Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports and correspondence concerning supplemental board consideration. DPPPEP states a report is not erroneous or unfair because the applicant believes it contributed to a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03161

    Original file (BC-2006-03161.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His additional rater abused his authority to encourage his deployed supervisor to reissue a Letter of Evaluation (LOE) with a negative statement in order to substantiate his comments and ratings on the contested EPR. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The additional rater of the contested EPR closing 9 November 2003, downgraded ratings rendered by the Rater in Section III, Evaluation of Performance, for “How Well Does Ratee Perform Assigned...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03455

    Original file (BC-2006-03455.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The contested EPR was a Change of Reporting Official (CRO) report covering 188 days of supervision for the period 3 April 2005 through 7 October 2005. To effectively challenge an EPR, it is necessary to hear from all members of the rating chain – not only for support, but also for clarification/explanation, and applicant has failed to provide any information/support from the rating chain on the contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03817

    Original file (BC-2006-03817.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The purpose of the feedback session is to give the ratee direction and to define performance expectations for the rating period in question. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the performance feedback work sheet is used to tell a ratee what is expected regarding duty performance and how well expectations are being met. After reviewing the documentation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03969

    Original file (BC-2006-03969.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant submitted copies of an excerpt of AFI 36-2406; AFPC/DPMM memorandum dated 11 April 2006; Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) letter dated 16 December 2005; two Air Force Review Boards Agency (AFRBA) letters dated 16 December 2005; Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) Decision; proposed EPR closing 14 January 2005; contested EPR closing 14 January 2005; Meritorious Service Medal documents; and EPR closing 14 January 2006 and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01662

    Original file (BC-2006-01662.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following is a resume of the applicant’s EPR profile: PERIOD ENDING PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION 15 Oct 02 5 15 Oct 03* 4 15 Oct 04 5 15 Oct 05 5 *Contested reports The ERAB considered and denied the applicant’s request to remove the contested report on 18 October 2005. However, while current Air Force policy requires performance feedback for personnel, a direct correlation between information provided during feedback sessions and the assessments on evaluation reports does not necessarily...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02684

    Original file (BC-2006-02684.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of two statements from orderly room personnel; EPRs closing 31 December 2004 and 19 April 2004; Performance Feedback Worksheet, dated 1 July 2004; Inspector General (IG) Personal and Fraud, Waste & Abuse Complaint; IG Complaint Response; Application for Correction/Removal of Evaluation Reports; Record Transmittal; and Evaluation Reports Appeal Board (ERAB) Disapproval. The applicant received a rating of a “4” on his EPR for the rating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03771

    Original file (BC-2003-03771.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03771 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period of 3 June 1999 through 30 January 2000 be removed from his records and he receive supplemental promotion consideration. On 22 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01345

    Original file (BC-2003-01345.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the AFBCMR voids the contested EPR, the applicant will become a selectee for promotion to TSgt during cycle 02E6, pending a favorable data verification and recommendation of the commander. If supplemental promotion consideration results in the selection for promotion to the higher grade, immediately after such promotion the records shall be corrected to show that he was promoted to the higher grade on the date of rank established by the supplemental promotion and that he is entitled to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03769

    Original file (BC-2006-03769.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03769 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 JUN 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His rating on his Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) closing 19 May 2006, be changed from an overall “4” to a “5”; the endorsement level be upgraded to “Senior Rater Deputy”...