Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00214
Original file (BC-2007-00214.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-00214
            INDEX CODE:  137.01

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her deceased husband and former military member’s record be changed to
show he elected to  participate  in  the  Reserve  Component  Survivor
Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and further that she receive the retired pay  her
husband had been eligible to receive for the nine month period  of  23
December 2005 to 27 September 2006.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her husband never received his retirement  pay  for  which  he  became
eligible in December 2005.  She has been  denied  the  opportunity  to
receive the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for  which
she has been eligible as surviving spouse since September 2006.

In  support  of  her  appeal,  the  applicant  has  provided  a  death
certificate and copies of personnel-related paperwork.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The member became eligible for Reserve retired pay under the provision
of 10  United  States  Code  (U.S.C.),  Section  12731,  effective  23
December 2005, his 60th birthday.  By  law,  members  must  apply  for
retired pay as receipt of such is not automatic.  To apply for Reserve
retired pay at age 60, a member must complete retired pay  application
forms and submit them to the Air Reserve Personnel Center  (ARPC)  for
approval and processing.  A retired pay packet was sent to the  member
on 18 July 2005; however, there is no record of  the  completed  forms
ever being  received  by  ARPC.   A  review  of  the  member’s  record
indicates he had the opportunity to make a  RCSBP  election  in  1989;
however, he did not complete and return his  election  form  to  ARPC.
The  effective  date  of  the  SBP  election  would  be  the  member’s
60th birthday.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPP recommends denial.  DPP states the member never  applied  for
retired pay nor did he make an RCSBP election.

DPP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant disagrees with the ARPC advisory and notes her  deceased
husband gave 20 years of distinguished  service  to  his  country  and
incredibly, as a result of dementia and alcoholism,  failed  to  apply
for retirement and thus become eligible to elect  RCSBP  coverage  for
his spouse.  He died of cardiovascular disease on 27  September  2006.
The applicant contends as a result of his illnesses he  was  prevented
from acting in  his  own  best  interest.   Further,  those  illnesses
conflicted with her right to  be  advised  of  a  lack  of  a  pension
decision.  Her rights, under the law, are to be  notified  should  her
then spouse not make an  RCSBP  election.   She  was  never  notified.
Applicant states she can no longer work  and  is  living  on  a  small
disability payment  from  Social  Security  while  being  treated  for
ovarian cancer for which she has underwent two operations.  One of the
strongest attractions of military service, in addition to the honor of
serving one’s country, is the contract to retire  after  20  years  of
service.  She is hopeful her appeal  to  correct  her  late  husband’s
service record will be granted as to deny her  small  portion  of  his
pension on a technicality would be a travesty of justice.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice.  We noted the applicant’s  claim  her
now  deceased  spouse  was  suffering  from  advanced  alcoholism  and
dementia which prohibited him from either  applying  for  his  Reserve
retired pay or making a valid RCSBP election.  We  further  noted  her
contention that her right to notification and consent  or  non-consent
under the law was not honored by the  Air  Force.   The  AFBCMR  Legal
Advisor states Public Law at the time  required  spousal  consent  for
declination of Reserve retired benefits.  The applicant denied she was
ever notified of her right to choose between consent  and  non-consent
of her now deceased spouses choices concerning RCSBP.  The absence  of
the required  documentation  of  spousal  consent  in  the  decedent’s
military record either confirms her contention she  was  not  notified
nor granted the opportunity to provide non-consent or it indicates the
Air Force  misplaced  any  documentation  she  might  have  submitted.
Regardless of which, either explanation leads to granting her  request
for RCSBP benefits.  In  fact,  earlier  SBP  case  law  supports  her
position as it shows courts are unwilling to rely on  the  presumption
of regularity  when  faced  with  an  applicant’s  assertion  of  non-
compliance and a lack of  government  documentation  of  the  required
notification and consent.  Therefore, we recommend that the records be
corrected as indicated below.

______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 December 2005:

      a. He applied for Reserve retired pay and his application was
approved by competent authority.

       b. He made a valid  Reserve  Component  Survivor  Benefit  Plan
election, based on full, retired pay, naming his spouse, M.K.  as  the
beneficiary.

______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-00214  in  Executive  Session  on  19  October  2007,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
      Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 January 2007, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ ARPC/DPP, dated 23 February 2007.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 March 2007.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 23 March 2007.
    Exhibit E.   Letter,  SAF/MRB,  dated  18  September  2007,
w/atchs.




                                   KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01076

    Original file (BC-2007-01076.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She retired in June 2004 and noticed she had been given several RCSBP election options that her now deceased spouse would have had but did not. She contends her spouse should have had the same paperwork at his retirement. She notes her husband was retired prior to his death and should have been given the same options all other retired members receive; such as an opportunity to update his election.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00012

    Original file (BC-2007-00012.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He applied for Reserve retired pay at age 60 and was given an opportunity to make an election under the RCSBP. He was sent the appropriate forms to apply for retired pay and SBP. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035

    Original file (BC-2007-00035.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00978

    Original file (BC-2007-00978.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her husband was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP by letter dated 28 December 1988. He made no election within 90 days of receipt of notification, and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred Election Until Age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Seasons 1 April 1992 through 31 March 1993, and 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000, members who had elected less than full coverage or no coverage for their spouse/children were able to change their election to cover their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03489

    Original file (BC-2005-03489.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Applicant states that her DFAS-CL 7220/48, Retiree Account Statement, shows an error for the RCSBP cost of $29.66 and request this error be corrected. She chose option C because their were no mention of RCSBP cost in Section VI, and the base personnel office did not make her aware of the cost associated with electing Option C. She never expected to pay for anything except for one payment for spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01017

    Original file (BC-2009-01017.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of the application, the applicant submits a letter to her husband’s commander, the Air Reserve Personnel Center’s letter to her late husband, and her late husband’s death certificate. DPP states the former service member was required to make an RCSBP election within 90 days of receipt of notification; however, he did not make an election when eligible in 1990. The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02867

    Original file (BC-2005-02867.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and the servicemember were divorced on 16 September 1999. She further requests consideration in correcting the RCSBP election of her former late-husband (Exhibit D). There is insufficient evidence presented indicating the servicemember’s intent to provide former spouse coverage for the applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02835

    Original file (BC-2005-02835.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and the servicemember were divorced on 16 September 1999. She further requests consideration in correcting the RCSBP election of her former late-husband (Exhibit D). There is insufficient evidence presented indicating the servicemember’s intent to provide former spouse coverage for the applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02051

    Original file (BC-2006-02051.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02051 INDEX CODE:137.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 JANUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her husband’s records be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) with election Option C (spouse only), based on full retired...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03261

    Original file (BC-2006-03261.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His father always sent his mother half of his retirement checks on time while he was alive. DPP states the court awarded former spouse coverage under the RCSBP program; however, the member did not notify this office of his marital status changes nor did his former spouse deem an election within a year as required by law. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...