RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02867
INDEX CODE: 137.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: Not
Indicated
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 MAR 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her former late husband's record be corrected to reflect he elected
former spouse coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit
Plan (RCSBP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She should receive the survivor benefits because she is the former
spouse of the deceased servicemember and he did not remarry.
She had no knowledge that such a benefit existed. Her late-former
husband never told her about this benefit when they were married or at
the time of their divorce.
She did not know she had one year after the divorce to apply for this
benefit.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant and late servicemember were married on 16 February 1974.
On 30 June 1997, the late servicemember was notified of his
eligibility to participate in the RCSBP. On 22 September 1997, the
servicemember submitted an election for Option C, Immediate Annuity
for Spouse and Child. The applicant and the servicemember were
divorced on 16 September 1999. The servicemember died on 27 March
2005.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/PSD states the servicemember and the applicant were divorced in
September 1999, and the SBP coverage for spouse and child was changed
to child only. Furthermore, it appears the applicant, in part, relies
on the transcript of the divorce hearing which contained questions
from her attorney discussing dividing present value equally. This is
not evidence of intent for former spouse coverage to be included in
the final order. There is no court order included directing former
spouse coverage under the SBP. The applicant stated her attorney
failed to be certain the process was completed within the one year
requirement. They recommend denying the requested relief.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that she
never knew the survivor benefit existed, so therefore she could not
apply for it within the one year window following their divorce. She
further requests consideration in correcting the RCSBP election of her
former late-husband (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air
Force and its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In this
respect, it appears that neither the servicemember nor the former
spouse submitted an valid election within the one-year period required
by law to establish former spouse coverage. There is insufficient
evidence presented indicating the servicemember’s intent to provide
former spouse coverage for the applicant. Therefore, in view of the
foregoing, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-02867 in Executive Session on 10 February 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Sep 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ ARPC/PSD, dated 12 Oct 05, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Oct 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02835
The applicant and the servicemember were divorced on 16 September 1999. She further requests consideration in correcting the RCSBP election of her former late-husband (Exhibit D). There is insufficient evidence presented indicating the servicemember’s intent to provide former spouse coverage for the applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02913
The servicemember did not elect former spouse coverage on the applicant’s behalf. Counsel further states, based on the facts and the personal statement of the applicant, the Board should consider the benefit of doubt and find in favor of the applicant (Exhibit D). We do not take issue with the applicant’s contention that her divorce decree ordered her deceased former husband to provide former spouse coverage for her under the SBP, but he did not do so.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02849
There is no evidence the servicemember submitted a valid election to voluntarily change the SBP coverage from spouse to former spouse within the required one year time limit following their divorce. The servicemember married M. on 23 September 1994, and the servicemember did not request that SBP coverage be established on her behalf. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 November 2005, the Board staff forwarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02725
Applicant’s counsel requests copies of all documents by which the Air Force determined that her client gave inadequate notice of her entitlement to the SBP, of which benefits were awarded her (and paid for by her) pursuant to the divorce decree. Apparently the Air Force determined they received adequate notice to pay her client her portion of the court-ordered military retirement benefits, it appears incongruous for the Air Force now to take the position that such notice was inadequate to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02726
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: At the time of the servicemember’s retirement on 1 April 1976, he and the applicant were married and he declined to elect spouse coverage under the SBP. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPTR states the laws that controlled SBP precluded a married servicemember, who declined spouse coverage at the time of retirement, from providing SBP former...
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon her late husband’s retirement, he completed the SBP Election Certificate and elected Option A to decline to make an election at that time, but to remain eligible to make an election for coverage at age 60. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her late husband’s records should be modified to allow participation in the RCSBP. The following members of the Board considered this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 02657 INDEX CODE: 137.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 FEBRUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouse’s records be corrected to show that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Neither she nor her ex- husband was ever informed...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00035 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 June 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s marital status be changed from “single” to “married” in the year 2001, and that his records be changed to show he elected to participate in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01301
The complete DPPRT evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her undated and unsigned response, the applicant states that for her aunt not to apply for her SBP annuity speaks volumes. It appears documentation was filed to report her uncle’s death but the process for application of the SBP annuity was never completed. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00973
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Air Force indicated the member and the applicant were married on 10 Aug 74 and the member elected spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Jul 97 retirement. NOVEL Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of [APPLICANT] I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and...