Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03752
Original file (BC-2006-03752.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-03752

            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NOT INDICATED

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  9 JUN 2008


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be  corrected  to  show  he  was  awarded  the  Air  Force
Commendation Medal (AFCM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was awarded the AFCM, but it is not listed  on  his  DD  Form  214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

In support of his request, applicant submits an  AF  Form  2224,  AFCM
Certificate, AFCM Citation, and a copy of his DD Form 214.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s records reflect he enlisted in the Regular  Air  Force
on 16 December 1980, for a period of four years.  He was progressively
promoted to the grade of staff sergeant.  On 15 January 1985,  he  was
honorably discharged for Expiration Term of Active Obligated  Service.
He served a total of four years and one month active duty service.

He was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal and the Air Force  Good
conduct Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial.  DPPPR states in part, the applicant did
not provide the Special Order awarding him the  AFCM  and  without  it
they recommend disapproval.

The DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
20 April 2007, for review and comment within  30  days.   As  of  this
date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review  of  the
applicant’s submission and the available evidence of  record,  we  are
not persuaded that the relief requested should be  granted.   We  took
notice of the complete submission in judging the merits of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinions and  recommendations  of  the  Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as  the
basis for our conclusion that the  former  member  has  not  been  the
victim of an error or  injustice.   Should  the  applicant  secure  an
official order issued approving the medal, the Board would  reconsider
his application.   In  the  absence  of  such  evidence,  we  find  no
compelling basis to warrant  favorable  consideration  of  the  relief
sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of a material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2006-
03752 in Executive Session on 20 June 2007, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
                 Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Nov 06, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Memo, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 11 April 07.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Apr 07.





      THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
      Chair




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00846

    Original file (BC-2007-00846.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant does not meet the award criteria as specified by the Air Force office of primary responsibility; therefore, we agree with HQ AFPC/DPPPR’s opinion and recommendation and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02975

    Original file (BC-2006-02975 .DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial since a thorough search of applicant’s records cannot verify his entitlement to this award with the “V” device, as well as the fact that applicant received his AFCM for the period September 1967 to July 1968. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01591

    Original file (BC-2007-01591.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ AFPC/DPPPR’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Jun 07 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01787

    Original file (BC-2006-01787.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant was not able to provide a copy of an order showing he was awarded the AFCM, he was able to provide an AFCM Certificate for meritorious service from 10 October 1960 to 2 April 1962 and signed on 11 May 1962. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 11 May 1962, he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02624

    Original file (BC-2007-02624.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of his request for award of the AFCM. The AFPC/DPSIDR complete evaluation at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 26 Oct 07, for review and response within 30 days. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 15 Oct 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-03866

    Original file (BC-2006-03866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his previous request, he raised the issue of proficiency pay stating the Board did not address it. His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit L. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate that the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice warranting further correction to his record. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01430

    Original file (BC-2006-01430.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Directorate of Assignments after a thorough review of the applicant’s records verified he was on ground in Vietnam in February 1972. The documentation provided by the applicant and his military records do not substantiate he had an injury that met the criteria for award of the PH; nor has he provided any evidence to substantiate the request for award of the PH, such as an eyewitness statement validating the incident relating to the injuries. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant’s Counsel,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01959

    Original file (BC-2005-01959.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01959 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 DECEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 2A771, Aircraft...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03866

    Original file (BC-2006-03866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant believes his Impaired Hearing and Tinnitus were caused by the noise exposure he experienced while performing duties as a senior woodworker. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that he was awarded the AFCM 3OLC. Nor do we find evidence showing that his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to any grade higher than that currently reflected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01376

    Original file (BC-2006-01376.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01376 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 NOVEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) with one oak leaf cluster (1OLC) and the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and the...