RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01376
INDEX CODE: 107.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 NOVEMBER 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Force
Commendation Medal (AFCM) with one oak leaf cluster (1OLC) and the
Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and the Washington State
Commendation Medal.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was presented these awards after his retirement from the Air Force.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, a copy
of his award and citation awarding him the AFCM and a copy of National
Guard Bureau Form 22 (NGB Form 22).
His complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force 21 November 1952 for a
period of four years. He was discharged with an honorable discharge
on 31 January 1989. He had 21 years, 11 months and 10 days of total
active service.
The Department of Defense (DoD) approved the KDSM to USAF Active Duty,
ANG, AF Reserve personnel for military service in the Republic of
Korea (ROK) and surrounding waters after 28 July 1954 to a date to be
determined by the Secretary of Defense. Individual eligibility is
member must have been assigned, attached, or mobilized to units
operating or serving on all the land area of the ROK, and the
contiguous waters out to 12 nautical miles, and all airspace above all
the land area of Korea and water areas. To be eligible for the KDSM,
personnel must have been physically present in the areas above for 30
consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days, or meet one of the
following criteria: 1. Be engaged in actual combat during an armed
engagement, regardless of the time in the areas of eligibility. 2.
Killed, wounded, or injured in the line of duty and required medical
evacuation from the area of eligibility. 3. While participating as a
regularly assigned aircrew member flying sorties into, out of, within,
or over the area of eligibility in support of military operations.
Each day that one or more sorties are flown in accordance with these
criteria shall count as one day toward the 30/60 day requirement. 4.
Personnel who serve(d) in operations and exercises conducted in the
areas of eligibility are considered eligible for the Korean Defense
Service Medal as long as the basic time criteria is met. Due to
extensive time period for eligibility, the nonconsecutive service
period for eligibility remains cumulative throughout the entire
period.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPR recommends denial. DPAPR states after a through review of
the record they were not able to locate a special order awarding him
the AFCM. In addition, to be eligible for the KDSM, personnel must
have been physically present in the areas above for 30 consecutive
days or 60 nonconsecutive days. The applicant was TDY to Korea for 10
days; therefore, the applicant is not eligible for the award of the
KDSM.
The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1
September 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board
is not persuaded that his records should be corrected to show he was
awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal or the Washington State
Commendation Medal. The applicant was TDY to Korea for only 10 days;
therefore, the applicant is not eligible for the award of the KDSM. In
addition, AFI 36-3202, Separations Documents, Table 4, Rule 23
indicates state awards are not recorded on the DD Form 214; as a
result, the applicant’s State Commendation Medal was not listed on his
DD Form 214. However, it is properly listed on the NGB Form 22.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
4. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice to warrant awarding the
applicant the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). While the applicant
was unable to provide a copy of his order approving the award, the
evidence provided has led us to believe that he did receive the AFCM
upon his retirement from the Air Force. In view of the above and in
order to resolve any injustice to the applicant, we recommend that his
records be corrected in the following manner.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 7 February 1989,
he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal for meritorious
service during the period 11 July 1987 through 31 January 1989.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-01376
in Executive Session on 3 October 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Todd L. Schafer, Member
Ms. Elwood C. Lewis, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 April 2006, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 23 August 2006.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 September 2006.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR
1535 Command Dr, EE Wing, 3rd Flr
Andrews AFB MD 20762-7002
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
XXXXXXX
Dear XXXXXXX
Reference your application, AFBCMR BC-2006-00686, submitted
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603 (Section 1552, 10 USC).
After careful consideration of your application and military
records, the Board determined that the evidence you presented did
not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
Accordingly, the Board denied your application.
You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant
evidence for consideration by the Board. In the absence of such
additional evidence, a further review of your application is not
possible.
BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR
GREG E.
JOHNSON.
Chief
Examiner
Air Force Board
for Correction
of Military
Records
Attachment:
Record of Board Proceedings
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04152
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR reviewed this application and recommends denial, stating, in part, that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military record and with confirmation by the Directorate of Assignments (AFPC/DPA) they found no assignment, deployment, or TDY to Korea that meets the requirements for entitlement to the KDSM. Personnel who serve in operations and exercises conducted in the areas of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02887
According to the applicants available records, the applicant served on active duty from 11 Jan 56 to 13 Jun 60, and was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 7 days of Foreign Service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00008
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00008 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for service at Osan Air Base, Korea during the period Jun 62 to Jul 62. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015795C071108
The applicant states, in effect, that the Korean Service Medal and the Joint Service Commendation Medal were awarded after he was discharged from active duty 3. Evidence shows that the applicant was awarded the Joint Service Commendation Medal for the period February 1997 through November 2000. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03649
At the time of his retirement the KDSM was not yet authorized and was not included in his military records. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicants military records and the documentation provided they believe an injustice may exist. After reviewing the documentation submitted, we believe, the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to support award of the KDSM.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02734
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02734 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show his entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Service member must have been assigned, attached or mobilized to units operating in the area of eligibility for...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03994
He states it had to exist because he was assigned there. In support of his request, the applicant submitted a personal letter, email correspondence and documentation extracted from his military personnel and medical records. There was no official documentation provided or located in his records that verifies he completed the required 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days to be eligible for award of the KDSM.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02063
In support of his request, applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214/DD Form 215, a document from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts signed by the Governor thanking him for his performance of duties in the Korean War, and a copy of his DD Form 256 AF, Honorable Discharge from the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial since no foreign service is listed on applicant’s DD Form 214 and the office of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020043
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the KDSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea (ROK). Due to the extensive time period for KDSM eligibility, the nonconsecutive service period for eligibility remains cumulative throughout the entire period.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01943
His foreign service time to South Korea be documented on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...