Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01965
Original file (BC-2006-01965.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01965
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  1 January 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He  be  awarded  the  Presidential  Unit  Citation  (PUC),  Air  Force
Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA),  Vietnam  Service  Medal  with  Bronze
Service Stars (VSM  w/BSS),  Small  Arms  Expert  Marksmanship  Ribbon
(SAEMR), Air Force Longevity Service Award  (AFLSA)  and  Republic  of
Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

These are  awards  and  decorations  for  the  Vietnam  War  that  are
rightfully his and were never entered into his service record.

In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal  statement  and
supporting documentation.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force  who  served  on
active duty from 20 September 1965 to 19 September 1971.   During  the
period 28 April 1968 to 28 April 1969, he was  assigned  to  Thailand;
therefore, he  is  entitled  the  Presidential  Unit  Citation  (PUC),
Vietnam Service Medal with 4 Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/4  BSS),  and
Republic of Vietnam  Gallantry  Cross  with  Palm  (RVNGC  w/P).   The
applicant’s Report of Separation will be updated.

The VSM is currently out of stock until further notice and  the  RVNGC
w/P is an award of a foreign government and is not stocked  or  issued
by the  United  States  Government.   Both  may  be  obtained  from  a
commercial source.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the  AFOUA,
AFLSA and SAEMR be denied.  DPPPR states, they were unable  to  verify
an award of the AFOUA during his assignment and they  were  unable  to
locate AF Form 522, USAF Ground Weapons Training Data, showing he  had
qualified as an expert with the M-16 or a  handgun  on  an  Air  Force
firing range.  Therefore, they are unable to verify his entitlement to
the SAEMR.  The AFLSA is awarded to all service members  of  the  U.S.
Air Force  who  complete  four  years  of  honorable  active  military
service.  The applicant completed three years, seven months  and  four
days of active military service therefore; he is not eligible for this
award.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant states during basic training at Lackland AFB in  October
1965 he qualified as an Expert in Small Arms.  He has a  copy  of  his
Air  Force  Training  record  but  none  of  his  three   small   arms
qualifications are listed on the record.   He  qualified  three  times
with the rifle.  Once at Lackland during basic  and  two  years  later
with the M-16 at Beale AFB, a  semi-annual  requalification  in  1967.
Again with a two-day course on the M-16,  including  qualification  on
the range.  There should be a record card of each qualification in his
Air Force record.  He personally knows the expert  qualification  card
from Lackland during basic training was in his  personal  record.   If
the qualification card is no longer there, then all he is  asking  for
is a fair shake with the Board’s  ruling.   He  states  the  AFLSA  is
awarded to all service members of the USAF who complete four years  of
honorable active or reserve military service with the Air  Force.   He
spent six years on active and reserve duty.  He is  entitled  to  this
award.  He further states that he cannot believe  the  AFOUA  was  not
issued to the 456th Strategic Aerospace Wing  while  he  was  assigned
there.

Applicant's complete response is attached at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt its rationale as the  basis  for  the  conclusion  that  the
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or   injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 8 March 2007, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
                 Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Jun 06, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 28 Dec 06.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jan 07.




                             THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                             Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03427

    Original file (BC-2011-03427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) – administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03667

    Original file (BC-2003-03667.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03667 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with “V” device (AFOUA w/V), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVGC w/P), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00813

    Original file (BC-2011-00813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPSIDR has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the PUC, AFOUA w/V, the RVNGC w/P, and the Vietnam Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/3BSS). His DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to include these awards. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00813 in Executive Session on 2 Aug 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00924

    Original file (BC-2006-00924.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00924 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 SEPTEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Air Force Longevity Award (AFLSA) and the Small Arms Expert...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01030

    Original file (BC-2005-01030.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01030 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect award of the Joint Service Commendation Medal (JSCM), the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01775

    Original file (BC-2005-01775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01775 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM), Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Long Tour (AFOSR-L), American Defense Service Medal (ADSM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03049

    Original file (BC 2014 03049.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualified as “expert” in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issued handgun. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID notes the applicant’s entitlement RVGC w/P, AFLSA, AFOUA, PUC, Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03108

    Original file (BC 2014 03108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00699

    Original file (BC-2005-00699.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 August 2004, the applicant submitted a similar request to have his records corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) with one Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC), the Air Force Recruiter Ribbon (AFRR) and the Air Force Master Level Occupational Badge for Supply. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant, in response to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01591

    Original file (BC-2007-01591.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ AFPC/DPPPR’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 Jun 07 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...