RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03667
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with “V” device (AFOUA
w/V), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVGC w/P), Republic of
Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), Vietnam Service Medal with one silver
service star (VSM w/1SSS), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon
(SAEMR), the Presidential Unit citation with “V” device, and the VSM with
three bronze service stars (VSM w/3BSS).
Examiner’s Note: AFPC/DPPPRA indicated the applicant’s records show he is
entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with “V” device (AFOUA
w/V), the Vietnam Service Medal w/3 Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/3BSS), the
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVGC w/P), and the Republic
of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). Therefore, the only issues before the
Board is the SAEMR, the PUC w/V, and the VSM w/1SSS.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He should have received the requested awards.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 September 1967 in the
grade of airman basic for a period of four years.
On 7 September 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of
sergeant, under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Expiration Term of Service).
He served four years total active military service.
The applicant’s DD Form 214 indicates he received the following decorations
and medals: National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Air
Force Commendation Medal, and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal.
On 2 December 2003, AFPC/DPPPRA advised the applicant they verified his
entitlement to the RVGC w/P, VSM w/3 BSS, and the RVCM. They advised there
is no indication in his records he was awarded the SAEMR and he did not
provide any documentation to substantiate his claim. They stated the
bronze service stars for campaign credit are not verified only by the
specific time period for each campaign; an individual must be assigned to a
unit that received credit for participating in each campaign. His unit,
the 377th Security Police Squadron, only received credit for participation
in three campaigns while he was assigned to the unit, not five. Therefore,
he was asked to withdraw the portion of his application requesting award of
one silver service star for the VSM. They further indicated in order to
verify his eligibility for award of the SAEMR, they needed a legible copy
of the order awarding it to him or an unaltered AF Form 522 showing he
qualified as Expert on an Air Force firing range.
On 2 February 2004, the following awards were added to his DD Form 214:
VSM w/1BSS, AFOUA w/V, RVNGC w/P, and the VSM.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR indicated they verified his entitlement to the AFOUA w/V, RVCM
and RVGS w/P, but could only verify the VSM w/3 BSS, not one silver service
star and they have already been added to his DD Form 214 (Report of
Transfer or Discharge). The 377th Security Police Squadron was only
credited with participation in three campaigns while the applicant was
assigned to the unit; therefore, he is only entitled to three bronze
service stars on his VSM. Although he requested award of the PUC with V
device in his 12 December 2003 response, they consider his request for
award of the AFOUA w/V to have resolved this issue. His unit was not
awarded the PUC while he was assigned to the unit, and the “V” device is
not added to this unit award. This issue is considered to have been
resolved administratively. Without any official documentation showing the
applicant qualified as Expert on an Air Force firing range, they are unable
to verify his eligibility for the SAEMR. The applicant did not provide any
documentation to substantiate his claim, even after being asked to do so.
They recommend disapproval of the one silver service star to the VSM and
the SAEMR.
The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 13 February 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been
the victim of an error or an injustice. According to the applicant’s
military personnel records there is no indication he was eligible for the
SAEMR, PUC w/V, and the VSM w/1SSS. On 2 December 2003, AFPC/DPPPRA
advised the applicant there is no indication in his records he was awarded
the SAEMR and he did not provide any documentation to substantiate his
claim. They stated the bronze service stars for campaign credit are not
verified only by the specific time period for each campaign, rather, an
individual must be assigned to a unit that received credit for
participating in each campaign. His unit, the 377th Security Police
Squadron, only received credit for participation in three campaigns while
he was assigned to the unit, not five. Therefore, he was asked to withdraw
the portion of his application requesting award of one silver service star
for the VSM. Also, it appears the applicant’s unit was awarded the AFOUA
w/V rather than the PUC while he was assigned to it, as noted by
AFPC/DPPPRA. They further indicated in order to verify his eligibility for
award of the SAEMR, they needed a legible copy of the order awarding it to
him or an unaltered AF Form 522 showing that he qualified as Expert on an
Air Force firing range. We note the applicant has not submitted any of the
requested documentation. In view of this, we are not persuaded the
applicant has established his entitlement to the decorations. We note
AFPC/DPPPRA has indicated the applicant is entitled to the RVGC w/P, VSM
w/3 BSS, AFOUA, and the RVCM and these awards have been added to the
applicant’s DD Form 214. Therefore, in view of the above, and in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; that the application was denied
without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2003-
03667 in Executive Session on 10 March 2004 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
Ms. Ann-Cecile M. McDermott, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 September 2003, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 29 January 2004,
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 February 2004.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01385
On 12 Jul 06, the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) notified the applicant that his request for the PUC, the RVCM, and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Short Tour (AFOSR-S) were denied. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01486
He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) administratively corrected. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The former member served in the Vietnam War at Cam Ranh Bay Air Base, Republic of South Vietnam from 10 Nov 70 until the time of his death on 21 Jun 71. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01486 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01932
He be awarded the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM). Only one award per operation is authorized. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01932 in Executive Session on 21 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 May 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01876
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Because he is not entitled to the VSM and his service was outside the inclusive period of the award, the applicant is not eligible for the RVCM. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) and will correct his records administratively.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03364
They indicated there is no evidence the applicant was assigned to any unit which was awarded the PUC. An individual is only entitled to share in a unit award of the unit to which he/she is assigned during the unit award period. Therefore, since he was not assigned to any unit awarded the PUC, he is not eligible to share in the PUC awarded to other units.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03049
The SAEMR is awarded to all Air Force service members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualified as expert in small arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issued handgun. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID notes the applicants entitlement RVGC w/P, AFLSA, AFOUA, PUC, Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03427
The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00987
Therefore, the only issue to be considered by the Board is the applicant's request regarding the SAEMR. On 12 April 2004, DPPPRA informed the applicant his records did not reflect he earned the SAEMR, nor did he provide any documentation to substantiate his claim for the SAEMR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01788
Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVGC w/P) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was attached to the 8th Security Police Squadron from April 1968 until April 1969. DPSIDRA states that the 8th Security Police Squadron received the PUC for the inclusive periods of 16 December 1966 to 2 January 1967 and 1 January 1971 to 1 April 1971; however, the applicant was not assigned to this unit during the qualifying periods. In...