RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01949
INDEX CODE: 108.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 JANUARY 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect he received a medical disability
retirement.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not given a medical board prior to his discharge. The doctor
at the retirement physical only spent 5 minutes on the exam.
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted letters from the
Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), Social Security Administration,
Retirement, Survivors and Disability Insurance.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 20 May 1983.
He was honorably retired on 1 December 2003. He served 20 years, 6
month and 11 days of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted
from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR STAFF EVALUATION:
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends the requested relief be
denied. The applicant contends he was not given a sufficiently
thorough physical examination to identify that he was disabled. The
applicant had a routine physical examination in October 2000 and no
unfitting medical conditions were identified. According to the Air
Force Instructions (AFIs), no additional physical examinations were
required at the time of retirement or separation, if the previous
physical examination was within three years, unless the applicant
related a potentially unfitting medical condition to medical
authorities or medical authorities identified a potentially disabling
medical condition. A review of the applicant’s service medical,
personnel records and performance reports indicate the applicant
continued to perform his assigned duties up to the time of his
retirement without restriction. The applicant despite having multiple
medical problems was able to complete his term of service without
warranting a referral to the disability evaluation system. The
applicant met an Air Force Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) in July 1993
and a Navy MEB in January 1996 and was returned to duty both times
with an Assignment Limitation Code – C (medical assignment
limitation). Furthermore, the applicant’s medical records do no
reflect that his medical condition worsened requiring another MEB at
the time of his retirement.
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION:
On 18 April 2007, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. Applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
AFBCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his rationale as the basis for our
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. The applicant is requesting his records be corrected to
reflect he received medical disability retirement because he was not
given a medical board prior to his retirement. Although, the
applicant was seen and treated for multiple medical conditions, it
appears none of these conditions interfered with the performance of
his duties to the extent warranting a disability retirement. Title
10, USC, Chapter 61 is the federal statue that charges the Service
Secretaries with maintaining a fit and vital force. For an individual
to be considered unfit for military service there must be a medical
condition so severe that it prevented the performance of any work
commensurate with the servicemembers rank and experience. Evidence of
record indicates the applicant was found fit and medically qualified
for continued military service at the time of his retirement.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01949 in Executive Session on 11 July 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2006-01949 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Jun 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, Medical Consultant, dated
16 Apr 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Apr 07.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00545
After the review the IPEB determined his PTSD rendered him unfit for further service and recommended he be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a compensable percentage of 50 percent. The applicant did not concur with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB and requested a formal PEB (FPEB). The Medical Consultant states the preponderance of the record supports the PEB rating of 50 percent for his PTSD.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00262
The emergency physician did not order an MRI or refer him for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted. Whereas, the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2006-002261
AFPC/DPSD recommends the applicant’s case file, medical records, and related documents be reviewed by the AFBCMR to determine what actions should be taken regarding his request. The medical community did, in fact, “drop the ball” as he was released from active duty and transferred to the Reserve Retired List after it was determined that he was unfit for duty and could not perform the job for which he was trained. He had a medical condition that made him unfit for military service and, by...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03395
The IPEB found him unfit for duty and discharged him on 10 January 2005. The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded asking the board to also upgrade his reentry code of 2Q which denotes "Personnel medically retired or discharged" to a code requiring no waiver. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01949
A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) should have been initiated; instead he was administratively discharged. On 15 Oct 2012, his commander notified him he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airman. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01368
On 24 November 2004, he was notified he would not be reenlisted in the ANG and that his AGR tour would end concurrent with his date of separation of 6 April 2005. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommended denial. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 2 May 07 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 May 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01056
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant stated that, at the time of separation from active duty with the Regular Air Force, the applicant’s left knee condition was not “unfitting” for continued active military service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The additional advisory opinion is provided following review of the previous AFBCMR action granting the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-00552
Both Boards recommended permanent retirement with a disability rating of 40 percent. DPPD therefore recommends his record be corrected to show he was retired by reason of physical disability for fibromyalgia with a permanent disability rating of 60 percent. AFPC/DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel for the applicant states while the BCMR Medical Consultant’s advisory...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03406
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted, since a 10 percent rating was appropriate at the time of the applicant’s separation. Whereas, the Air Force rates a member's disability based on the degree of severity at the time of separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01247
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3212, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, and Separation, paragraph 4.5, states that members undergoing an MEB must not be retired, discharged, or released from active duty for any reason until notification is received from the Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF). The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit...