Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03006
Original file (BC-2006-03006.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-03006
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  6 APRIL 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded  the  Good  Conduct
Medal (GCM).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In 1947, he was favorably considered for the GCM, but  never  received
it.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his WD AGO
Form 24A, Service Record and WD  AGO  Form  53,  Enlisted  Record  and
Report of Separation Honorable Discharge.

Applicant's complete submission, with an attachments, is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 20 June 1946, the applicant enlisted in  the  Army  of  the  United
States (AUS) as a private for a period of three years.

The  applicant’s  service  record  states  “1  August  1947,  SOL  was
favorably considered for the GCM.”

The applicant was honorably discharged on 8 June 1949 in the grade  of
sergeant.  He served 2 years, 11 months and 19 days of active service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request be  denied.   AFPC/DPPPR
states the GCM was authorized on 28 June 1941; for
award to enlisted members who shall  have  honorably  completed  three
continuous years of active military service subsequent  to  26  August
1940; and who  were  recommended  by  their  commanding  officers  for
exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity.  The applicant  did  not
complete the required  three  years  of  active  duty  service  to  be
eligible for the GCM.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
27 October 2006, for review and response within 30 days.  As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice.  After careful consideration of
the limited documentation available for the Board’s review, the  Board
believes sufficient evidence has been presented to  warrant  favorable
action on the applicant’s request for award of the GCM.  We  note  the
applicant’s service record reflects he was  favorably  considered  for
the GCM on 1 August 1947.  Based on this statement in the  applicant’s
service record.  We believe it was the commander’s intent to award the
applicant  the  GCM.   With  no  basis  to  question  the  applicant’s
integrity, and in recognition of his service to the Nation, it is  our
opinion that any doubt should be resolved in  the  applicant's  favor.
Therefore, we  recommend  his  records  be  corrected  to  the  extent
indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Air
Force Good Conduct Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-03006 in  Executive  Session  on  29  November  2006,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                                  Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
                                  Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
                                  Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member


All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Sep 06, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 20 Oct 06.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 06.




                             MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                             Panel Chair







AFBCMR BC- BC-2006-03006





MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116) it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to             be corrected to show that he was awarded
the Air Force Good Conduct Medal.




                             JOE G. LINEBERGER
                             Director
                             Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00037

    Original file (BC-2006-00037.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation allows that any soldier discharged with less than three years service is to receive the GCM if otherwise qualified. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02855

    Original file (BC-2006-02855.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02855 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be changed to show he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) or campaign medal. He never served in the area of eligibility (Vietnam) to be eligible for award of the AFEM or any other...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00350

    Original file (BC-2006-00350.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was transferred to the Air Force Reserve for completion of his military service obligation (13 November 1967). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that although the Airman’s Medal was not recommended in his Letters of Appreciation, he was told he would receive the medal. After reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03385

    Original file (BC-2005-03385.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03385 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 8 MAY 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and any other awards he may be entitled to for his Vietnam...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03897

    Original file (BC-2005-03897.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. In November 1998, the applicant’s records were reviewed and no documents were found to substantiate his award of the BSM. The applicant did not provide any documentary evidence to substantiate his claim or, that he was recommended for, or awarded, the BSM.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02522

    Original file (BC-2006-02522.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214. On 4 October 2006, a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty was issued adding the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with one Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/1 OLC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00322

    Original file (BC-2006-00322.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following is the only known information pertaining to the applicant's service and was extracted from the partially reconstructed record and from the document provided by the applicant. We took notice of the applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for a head injury he sustained when his plane went down in Ardennes, France after being struck by flak. However, should the applicant obtain testimonies from other members from his unit that were on the mission when...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00051

    Original file (BC-2006-00051.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00051 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JUL 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded campaign credit for supporting Operation Northern Watch (ONW). Members assigned to Incirlik Air Base as permanent party during the inclusive period do not qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03541

    Original file (BC-2006-03541.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy an AFCM citation and certificate awarded to a former member of his unit which was awarded during the time he alleges he was assigned. However, after review by AFPC/DPPRY, it was discovered the applicant is also entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and one oak leaf cluster, the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the Air Force Longevity Service Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, and the Republic...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01518

    Original file (BC-2006-01518.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...