RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02231
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 JANUARY 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) (undesirable)
discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His summary court-martial conviction was supposed to be vacated after
30 days.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
There is no documentation in the applicant’s master personnel records
(MPR) relating to the reason for his discharge or the discharge
process.
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) as an airman
basic (AB) on 15 March 1963 for a period of four years. He was
honorably released from active duty on 14 March 1967 and transferred
into the Air Force Reserves (AFRes). He was discharged from the AFRES
on 17 July 1967 and enlisted in the RegAF on 18 July 1967.
The following facts are documented in the applicant’s MPR:
a. On 7 December 1967, the applicant received Permanent
Change of Station (PCS) Orders (AG-120) reassigning him from Chanute
AFB to San Francisco, with training in route to attend a technical
training course at Eglin AFB, Florida.
b. On 6 February 1968, the applicant was reported as
being absent without leave (AWOL) by the 4420 Combat Support Group.
c. On 7 March 1968, Special Order AG-362 was issued
rescinding Special Order AG-120.
d. On 15 March 1968, a message was sent out dropping
the applicant from the rolls as a deserter.
e. On 18 March 1968, the 14th Combat Support Group
notified Chanute AFB that the applicant arrived at their station on
1 March 1968 and was present for duty.
f. On 2 April 1968, action was taken to rescind all
actions pertaining to the applicant being AWOL and dropped from the
rolls.
g. On 5 April 1968, summary court-martial charges were
preferred against he applicant for:
1) On or about 25 March 1968, without proper
authority, the applicant left his appointed place of duty.
2) On or about 26 March 1968, without proper
authority, the applicant left his appointed place of duty.
The applicant was found guilty and sentenced to a reduction to the
grade of airman basic, restriction to the limits of the base for 30
days and to perform extra duty for 30 days. The sentence was approved
and suspended until 25 February 1969, at which time, unless the
suspension is sooner vacated, the sentence would be remitted without
further action.
h. On 22 April 1968, upon completion of the above
personnel actions, the matter was referred to the applicant’s squadron
commander for judicial action.
The applicant was separated from the Air Force on 14 August 1968 under
the provisions of Air Force Manual (AFM) 39-12 (request for discharge
for the good of the service, with an under other than honorable
conditions (undesirable) discharge. The applicant had five years and
five months of active duty service.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of investigation,
Washington, D.C., indicated on the basis of the data furnished they
were unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS based on the limited documentation in the applicant’s
master personnel records defers to the Board to determine if the
requested relief should be granted. AFPC/DPPRS further states they
are unable to determine the propriety of the discharge based on the
lack of documentation in the applicant’s records. Furthermore, the
applicant did not submit any evidence or identified any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge process (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on
13 October 2006, for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice warranting an upgrade of the
applicant’s discharge. No evidence has been presented which would
lead the Board to believe the applicant’s discharge was improper or
contrary to the directive under which it was effected. Nevertheless,
after 38 years, and in view of the negative FBI report and the limited
documentation regarding the circumstances of his discharge, we are of
the opinion that upgrading the applicant’s discharge to general (under
honorable conditions), would be appropriate. In view of these
circumstances, we believe any doubt should be resolved in favor of the
applicant. Therefore, we recommend the service member’s records be
correct to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 14 August 1968, he
was discharged with the service characterized as general (under
honorable conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-02231 in Executive Session on 29 November 2006 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jul 06.
Exhibit B. Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 15 Sep 06.
Exhibit E. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Oct 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-02231
INDEX CODE: 110.00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116) it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that on 14 August
1968, he was discharged with the service characterized as general
(under honorable conditions).
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02641
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, a statement, DD Form 4s, Enlistment Record Armed Forces of the United States, Air Force Form 7, Airman Military Record and various medical documents. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit G). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02681 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Mar 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason (Misconduct-Drug Use) for his 1983 honorable discharge be removed from his DD Form 214. On 18 Nov 83, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01086
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01086 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Taylor & Co Ltd. On 28 December 1966, the group commander advised applicant of his right to consult legal...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01692
On 3 April 1969, the applicant was notified that he was being discharged under the provisions of Air Force Manual (AFM) 39-10 for Mental Hygiene Evaluation. They state based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharged regulation. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02450
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02450 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of LBK (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00166
However, after thorough review of the evidence of record, it is our opinion that the comments of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility are supported by the evidence of record. We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the applicant's submission, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03606
Applicant was discharged on 10 May 84, in the grade of airman first class (E-3), under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Misconduct-Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00277
The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Furthermore, the discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00992
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00992 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETTION DATE AUGUST 5, 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable; his special court-martial conviction be overturned and removed from his personal records; his narrative reason...
The applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 12 August 1968. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his General Court-Martial is news to him since he was not at the base at the time. Applicant’s rebuttal is at Exhibit E. On 3 June 2002, a letter was forwarded to the applicant suggesting that he consider providing evidence pertaining to his...