RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-
03606
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 MAY 2008
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
An honorable discharge looks better on his resume.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of his DD Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 Feb 82, for a
period of four years in the grade of airman basic. On 22 Mar 84,
his squadron commander notified him that he was recommending his
discharge from the Air Force for minor disciplinary infractions.
The commander also recommended that the applicant receive a general
discharge.
The minor disciplinary infractions included an Article 15 for
failure to go, seven letters of reprimand, and four letters of
counseling. The reprimands and counseling’s were for being late
for duty (6), nonpayment of debts (2), speeding, being involved in
a domestic disturbance, and not carrying out assigned duties.
Applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge
and, waived his right to consult legal and to submit statements in
his own behalf.
The Staff Judge Advocate reviewed the case file and found it
legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended an under
honorable conditions (general) discharge without probation and
rehabilitation. The discharge authority approved the separation
and directed an under honorable conditions (general) discharge
without probation and rehabilitation.
Applicant was discharged on 10 May 84, in the grade of airman first
class (E-3), under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Misconduct-Pattern
of Minor Disciplinary Infractions, and received an under honorable
conditions (general) discharge. He served on active duty for
2 years, 2 months, 17 days.
Pursuant to the request of the Board on 11 Dec 06, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, indicated on 12 Dec 06,
that, on the basis of data furnished, they are unable to locate an
arrest record (Exhibit C).
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in
part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel
records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and
substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The
discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing.
Additionally, the applicant provided no facts warranting a change
to his character of service.
A complete copy of the DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 15 Dec 06, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a
response has not been received.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful
consideration of the available evidence, the discharge appears to
be in compliance with the governing regulations in effect at the
time and we find no evidence to indicate that the applicant’s
separation from the Air Force was inappropriate. We find no
evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the
documentation that has been submitted in support of applicant’s
appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an error or
injustice. Therefore, based on the available evidence of record,
we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application.
__________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-
03606 in Executive Session on 18 January 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Nov 06, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report of Investigation.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 1 Dec 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Dec 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00215
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00215 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2B be changed so that he may reenter the service. AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00632
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 Jul 81, for a period of six years in the grade of airman basic. Applicant was discharged on 29 Nov 83, in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Misconduct-Pattern Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil Authorities, and received an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. We find no evidence of error in this case...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01914
The specific reasons for this action were on 3 Jun 87, he received a Letter of Counseling for engaging in a fight with his roommate; on 18 May 05 he failed to return five video tapes in a timely manner to a local video store; on 5 May 87, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for passing counterfeit bills on two separate occasions; on 9 Mar 87, he received an LOR for writing a worthless check; on 18 Feb 87, he received an LOR for writing another worthless check; on 6 Feb 87, he received an...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01619
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01619 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 NOVEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. During his correctional custody applicant received 45 letters of counseling. Applicant was discharged...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01602
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01602 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 24 OCTOBER 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of his application, the applicant submits a copy of his DD 214 and his application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03835
The preponderance of evidence of the record shows that the applicant’s medical condition was not completely considered at the time of administrative discharge. That said, they found absolutely no link between the member’s misconduct and his diagnosed asthma and opines that if the case had been processed as a dual action, the Personnel Council would have directed administrative discharge IAW with AFI 36-3208. Additionally, we took note of the SAFPC determination that had the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02067
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02067 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 Jan 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03662
On 10 April 1986, he reported late for duty and received an LOR. DPPRS concludes the applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred during the discharge process, and provided no facts warranting a change to his character of service. After careful consideration of the available evidence and in the absence of evidence by the applicant to the contrary, we believe that the actions taken to effect his discharge were proper and in compliance with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00586
h. On 15 October 1986, the applicant failed to report for duty at the prescribed time, for which he received written counseling. For this misconduct, the applicant was counseled. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states the applicant has not submitted any evidence nor identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01277
On 10 August 1987, the commander signed a recommendation to the discharge authority for the applicant’s discharge based on misconduct under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-46 with a general discharge. On 8 September 1987, the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge with a narrative reason for separation of “Misconduct – Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions” and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2B” (discharged under general conditions). The...